{"title":"Trompe-l’oeil Mirrors of the Soul in Jan David, S.J.’s Duodecim specula (Twelve Mirrors) of 1610","authors":"Walter S. Melion","doi":"10.1163/22141332-11010002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Jan David, S.J.’s <em>Duodecim specula</em> (Antwerp: Jan Moretus, 1610), an innovative emblematic treatise in twelve chapters, focuses on various kinds and degrees of specular image generated by the human soul. Each chapter responds to an opening <em>imago</em>, designed and engraved by Theodoor Galle, that illustrates the operations of the mirror in question. Three of the <em>imagines, <span style=\"font-variant: small-caps;\">v</span>. The Mirror of Others’ Eyes</em>, <span style=\"font-variant: small-caps;\"><em>viii</em></span><em>. The Mirror of Created Things</em>, and <em><span style=\"font-variant: small-caps;\">x</span>. The Mirror of Example</em>, rather than displaying persons, actions, or things that fall under the purview of the respective mirror, instead depict the mirrored image that such a <em>speculum</em> is seen to reflect. Accordingly, as printed <em>imagines</em> that prove upon closer inspection to contain specular <em>imagines</em> or, better, that function as pictorial representations of particular kinds of image, these <em>imagines imaginum</em> (images of images) can be said to produce a trompe-l’oeil effect. They ask the reader-viewer to consider why s/he thinks s/he sees a present image when what is actually seen by the eye is a pictured image, a pictured picture, doubly mediated by the process of representation. My essay examines how and why this deceptive effect was marshaled by David as a figure of thought: by articulating the manner and meaning of these three <em>specula</em> in particular, he offers the reader-viewer a therapeutic antidote wherewith to combat the human propensity for idolatry and self-deception.</p>","PeriodicalId":41607,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Jesuit Studies","volume":"37 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Jesuit Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1163/22141332-11010002","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HISTORY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Jan David, S.J.’s Duodecim specula (Antwerp: Jan Moretus, 1610), an innovative emblematic treatise in twelve chapters, focuses on various kinds and degrees of specular image generated by the human soul. Each chapter responds to an opening imago, designed and engraved by Theodoor Galle, that illustrates the operations of the mirror in question. Three of the imagines, v. The Mirror of Others’ Eyes, viii. The Mirror of Created Things, and x. The Mirror of Example, rather than displaying persons, actions, or things that fall under the purview of the respective mirror, instead depict the mirrored image that such a speculum is seen to reflect. Accordingly, as printed imagines that prove upon closer inspection to contain specular imagines or, better, that function as pictorial representations of particular kinds of image, these imagines imaginum (images of images) can be said to produce a trompe-l’oeil effect. They ask the reader-viewer to consider why s/he thinks s/he sees a present image when what is actually seen by the eye is a pictured image, a pictured picture, doubly mediated by the process of representation. My essay examines how and why this deceptive effect was marshaled by David as a figure of thought: by articulating the manner and meaning of these three specula in particular, he offers the reader-viewer a therapeutic antidote wherewith to combat the human propensity for idolatry and self-deception.
期刊介绍:
This is a full Open Access journal. All articles are available for free from the moment of publication and authors do not pay an article publication charge. The Journal of Jesuit Studies (JJS) is a peer-reviewed quarterly journal dedicated to the study of Jesuit history from the sixteenth to the twenty-first century. It welcomes articles on all aspects of the Jesuit past and present including, but not limited to, the Jesuit role in the arts and sciences, theology, philosophy, mission, literature, and interreligious/inter-cultural encounters. In its themed issues the JJS highlights studies with a given topical, chronological or geographical focus. In addition there are two open-topic issues per year. The journal publishes a significant number of book reviews as well. One of the key tasks of the JJS is to relate episodes in Jesuit history, particularly those which have suffered from scholarly neglect, to broader trends in global history over the past five centuries. The journal also aims to bring the highest quality non-Anglophone scholarship to an English-speaking audience by means of translated original articles.