The clinical differentiation of blood culture-positive and -negative sepsis in burn patients: a retrospective cohort study

IF 6.3 1区 医学 Q1 DERMATOLOGY Burns & Trauma Pub Date : 2023-12-19 DOI:10.1093/burnst/tkad031
Jaechul Yoon, Dohern Kym, Jun Hur, Jongsoo Park, Myongjin Kim, Yong Suk Cho, Wook Chun, Dogeon Yoon
{"title":"The clinical differentiation of blood culture-positive and -negative sepsis in burn patients: a retrospective cohort study","authors":"Jaechul Yoon, Dohern Kym, Jun Hur, Jongsoo Park, Myongjin Kim, Yong Suk Cho, Wook Chun, Dogeon Yoon","doi":"10.1093/burnst/tkad031","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background Sepsis is a potentially life-threatening condition that occurs when the body’s response to infection leads to widespread inflammation and tissue damage. Negative cultures can make it difficult for clinicians to make a diagnosis and may raise questions about the validity of the definition of sepsis. In addition, the clinical distinctions between burn patients with blood culture-positive and -negative sepsis are also poorly understood. Therefore, this study aimed to examine the clinical differences between blood culture-positive and -negative sepsis in burn patients in order to improve the understanding of the pathophysiology and epidemiology of sepsis in this population. Methods This study had a retrospective design, and the participants were adults aged ≥18 years. Patients diagnosed with sepsis were divided into two groups based on their blood culture results within 1 week of sepsis diagnosis. Results We enrolled 1643 patients admitted to our institution’s burn intensive care unit between January 2010 and December 2021. pH, platelet count, bicarbonate and haematocrit were significant in both the positive and negative groups. However, lymphocyte, red cell distribution width and blood urea nitrogen were significant only in the positive group, whereas lactate dehydrogenase was significant only in the negative group. Acinetobacter baumannii, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, and Klebsiella pneumonia are common gram-negative bacterial species, and Staphylococcus aureus and Staphylococcus epidermidis are common gram-positive bacterial species seen in burn patients with positive blood cultures. Carbapenem resistance was found to be associated with an unfavourable prognosis in gram-negative bacteria, with the exception of P. aeruginosa. Conclusions pH, platelet count, bicarbonate and haematocrit were routine biomarkers that demonstrated statistical significance in both groups. Lactate dehydrogenase was significant in the blood-negative group, while red cell distribution width, blood urea nitrogen and lymphocyte count were significant in the positive group. Furthermore, the most common causes of sepsis are gram-negative bacteria, including A. baumannii, K. pneumoniae and P. aeruginosa. Additionally, resistance to carbapenems is associated with unfavourable outcomes.","PeriodicalId":9553,"journal":{"name":"Burns & Trauma","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":6.3000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Burns & Trauma","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/burnst/tkad031","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"DERMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background Sepsis is a potentially life-threatening condition that occurs when the body’s response to infection leads to widespread inflammation and tissue damage. Negative cultures can make it difficult for clinicians to make a diagnosis and may raise questions about the validity of the definition of sepsis. In addition, the clinical distinctions between burn patients with blood culture-positive and -negative sepsis are also poorly understood. Therefore, this study aimed to examine the clinical differences between blood culture-positive and -negative sepsis in burn patients in order to improve the understanding of the pathophysiology and epidemiology of sepsis in this population. Methods This study had a retrospective design, and the participants were adults aged ≥18 years. Patients diagnosed with sepsis were divided into two groups based on their blood culture results within 1 week of sepsis diagnosis. Results We enrolled 1643 patients admitted to our institution’s burn intensive care unit between January 2010 and December 2021. pH, platelet count, bicarbonate and haematocrit were significant in both the positive and negative groups. However, lymphocyte, red cell distribution width and blood urea nitrogen were significant only in the positive group, whereas lactate dehydrogenase was significant only in the negative group. Acinetobacter baumannii, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, and Klebsiella pneumonia are common gram-negative bacterial species, and Staphylococcus aureus and Staphylococcus epidermidis are common gram-positive bacterial species seen in burn patients with positive blood cultures. Carbapenem resistance was found to be associated with an unfavourable prognosis in gram-negative bacteria, with the exception of P. aeruginosa. Conclusions pH, platelet count, bicarbonate and haematocrit were routine biomarkers that demonstrated statistical significance in both groups. Lactate dehydrogenase was significant in the blood-negative group, while red cell distribution width, blood urea nitrogen and lymphocyte count were significant in the positive group. Furthermore, the most common causes of sepsis are gram-negative bacteria, including A. baumannii, K. pneumoniae and P. aeruginosa. Additionally, resistance to carbapenems is associated with unfavourable outcomes.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
烧伤患者血培养阳性和阴性败血症的临床鉴别:一项回顾性队列研究
背景败血症是一种可能危及生命的疾病,当机体对感染的反应导致广泛的炎症和组织损伤时就会发生败血症。培养阴性会使临床医生难以做出诊断,并可能对败血症定义的有效性产生疑问。此外,人们对烧伤患者血培养阳性和阴性败血症之间的临床区别也知之甚少。因此,本研究旨在探讨烧伤患者血培养阳性和阴性败血症之间的临床差异,以加深对该人群败血症病理生理学和流行病学的了解。方法 本研究采用回顾性设计,参与者为年龄≥18 岁的成年人。根据败血症确诊后 1 周内的血液培养结果,将确诊为败血症的患者分为两组。pH 值、血小板计数、碳酸氢盐和血细胞比容在阳性组和阴性组均有显著性差异。然而,只有阳性组的淋巴细胞、红细胞分布宽度和血尿素氮有显著性差异,而只有阴性组的乳酸脱氢酶有显著性差异。鲍曼不动杆菌、铜绿假单胞菌和肺炎克雷伯菌是常见的革兰氏阴性菌种,金黄色葡萄球菌和表皮葡萄球菌是烧伤患者血液培养阳性中常见的革兰氏阳性菌种。除铜绿假单胞菌外,碳青霉烯耐药性与革兰氏阴性菌的不良预后有关。结论 pH 值、血小板计数、碳酸氢盐和血细胞比容是常规生物标志物,在两组中均有统计学意义。乳酸脱氢酶在血阴性组有显著意义,而红细胞分布宽度、血尿素氮和淋巴细胞计数在血阳性组有显著意义。此外,败血症最常见的病因是革兰氏阴性菌,包括鲍曼不动杆菌、肺炎双球菌和铜绿假单胞菌。此外,对碳青霉烯类抗生素的耐药性与不利的预后有关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Burns & Trauma
Burns & Trauma 医学-皮肤病学
CiteScore
8.40
自引率
9.40%
发文量
186
审稿时长
6 weeks
期刊介绍: The first open access journal in the field of burns and trauma injury in the Asia-Pacific region, Burns & Trauma publishes the latest developments in basic, clinical and translational research in the field. With a special focus on prevention, clinical treatment and basic research, the journal welcomes submissions in various aspects of biomaterials, tissue engineering, stem cells, critical care, immunobiology, skin transplantation, and the prevention and regeneration of burns and trauma injuries. With an expert Editorial Board and a team of dedicated scientific editors, the journal enjoys a large readership and is supported by Southwest Hospital, which covers authors'' article processing charges.
期刊最新文献
SportSync health: revolutionizing patient care in sports medicine through integrated follow-up technologies. Dexmedetomidine regulates exosomal miR-29b-3p from macrophages and alleviates septic myocardial injury by promoting autophagy in cardiomyocytes via targeting glycogen synthase kinase 3β. Polylactic acid-based dressing with oxygen generation and enzyme-like activity for accelerating both light-driven biofilm elimination and wound healing Single-cell sequencing technology in skin wound healing Consensus on the prevention and repair of titanium mesh exposed wound after cranioplasty (2024 edition).
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1