{"title":"Foodborne pathogen inactivation in fruit juices utilizing commercial scale high-pressure processing: Effects of acidulants and pH.","authors":"Rebecca M Cheng, Jessie Usaga, Randy W Worobo","doi":"10.1177/10820132231219525","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The effects of juice pH, type of acidulant, and post-treatment refrigeration on the high-pressure processing (HPP) inactivation of <i>Escherichia coli</i> O157:H7, <i>Salmonella enterica</i>, and <i>Listeria monocytogenes</i> in acid beverages were evaluated. Inoculated apple, orange, and grape juices (at their original pH and adjusted to pH 4.00, 4.50, and 5.00) were treated at 550 MPa for 1 min at 5 °C. In addition, inoculated model solutions acidified to a pH of 5.00 with acetic, citric, malic, and tartaric acids were treated at 400 MPa for 1 min at 5 °C. The effect of refrigerated storage for 24 h after treatment on pathogen inactivation in both experiments was also assessed. A greater than 5-log reduction of the three pathogens inoculated was achieved in all juices immediately after HPP at the juices' original pH, and of <i>L. monocytogenes</i> under all experimental conditions. Refrigerated storage for 24 h after HPP treatment improved the inactivation of <i>E. coli</i> O157:H7, to >5-log reduction, at pH 4.00 in apple juice and of <i>Salmonella</i> in the three juices at pH 4.00. The type of acidulant did not significantly (<i>p </i>> 0.01) affect <i>E. coli</i> or <i>Salmonella</i> inactivation in acidified model solutions but a greater than 5-log reduction after HPP was only achieved for <i>L. monocytogenes</i> when acetic acid was used. The effectiveness of HPP for pathogen inactivation depended largely on product pH and the target pathogen of concern.</p>","PeriodicalId":12331,"journal":{"name":"Food Science and Technology International","volume":" ","pages":"592-600"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Food Science and Technology International","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/10820132231219525","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/12/12 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, APPLIED","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
The effects of juice pH, type of acidulant, and post-treatment refrigeration on the high-pressure processing (HPP) inactivation of Escherichia coli O157:H7, Salmonella enterica, and Listeria monocytogenes in acid beverages were evaluated. Inoculated apple, orange, and grape juices (at their original pH and adjusted to pH 4.00, 4.50, and 5.00) were treated at 550 MPa for 1 min at 5 °C. In addition, inoculated model solutions acidified to a pH of 5.00 with acetic, citric, malic, and tartaric acids were treated at 400 MPa for 1 min at 5 °C. The effect of refrigerated storage for 24 h after treatment on pathogen inactivation in both experiments was also assessed. A greater than 5-log reduction of the three pathogens inoculated was achieved in all juices immediately after HPP at the juices' original pH, and of L. monocytogenes under all experimental conditions. Refrigerated storage for 24 h after HPP treatment improved the inactivation of E. coli O157:H7, to >5-log reduction, at pH 4.00 in apple juice and of Salmonella in the three juices at pH 4.00. The type of acidulant did not significantly (p > 0.01) affect E. coli or Salmonella inactivation in acidified model solutions but a greater than 5-log reduction after HPP was only achieved for L. monocytogenes when acetic acid was used. The effectiveness of HPP for pathogen inactivation depended largely on product pH and the target pathogen of concern.
期刊介绍:
Food Science and Technology International (FSTI) shares knowledge from leading researchers of food science and technology. Covers food processing and engineering, food safety and preservation, food biotechnology, and physical, chemical and sensory properties of foods. This journal is a member of the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE).