Rapture of the deep: gas narcosis may impair decision-making in scuba divers.

IF 0.8 4区 医学 Q4 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH Diving and hyperbaric medicine Pub Date : 2023-12-20 DOI:10.28920/dhm53.4.306-312
Pauliina A Ahti, Jan Wikgren
{"title":"Rapture of the deep: gas narcosis may impair decision-making in scuba divers.","authors":"Pauliina A Ahti, Jan Wikgren","doi":"10.28920/dhm53.4.306-312","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>While gas narcosis is familiar to most divers conducting deep (> 30 metres) dives, its effects are often considered minuscule or subtle at 30 metres. However, previous studies have shown that narcosis may affect divers at depths usually considered safe from its influence, but little knowledge exists on the effects of gas narcosis on higher cognitive functions such as decision-making in relatively shallow water at 30 metres. Impaired decision-making could be a significant safety issue for a multitasking diver.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a study exploring the effects of gas narcosis on decision-making in divers breathing compressed air underwater. The divers (n = 22) were evenly divided into 5-metre and 30-metre groups. In the water, we used underwater tablets equipped with the Iowa Gambling Task (IGT), a well-known psychological task used to evaluate impairment in decision-making.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The divers at 30 metres achieved a lower score (mean 1,584.5, standard deviation 436.7) in the IGT than the divers at 5 metres (mean 2,062.5, standard deviation 584.1). Age, body mass index, gender, or the number of previous dives did not affect performance in the IGT.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our results suggest that gas narcosis may affect decision-making in scuba divers at 30 metres depth. This supports previous studies showing that gas narcosis is present at relatively shallow depths and shows that it may affect higher cognitive functions.</p>","PeriodicalId":11296,"journal":{"name":"Diving and hyperbaric medicine","volume":"53 4","pages":"306-312"},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10944662/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Diving and hyperbaric medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.28920/dhm53.4.306-312","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: While gas narcosis is familiar to most divers conducting deep (> 30 metres) dives, its effects are often considered minuscule or subtle at 30 metres. However, previous studies have shown that narcosis may affect divers at depths usually considered safe from its influence, but little knowledge exists on the effects of gas narcosis on higher cognitive functions such as decision-making in relatively shallow water at 30 metres. Impaired decision-making could be a significant safety issue for a multitasking diver.

Methods: We conducted a study exploring the effects of gas narcosis on decision-making in divers breathing compressed air underwater. The divers (n = 22) were evenly divided into 5-metre and 30-metre groups. In the water, we used underwater tablets equipped with the Iowa Gambling Task (IGT), a well-known psychological task used to evaluate impairment in decision-making.

Results: The divers at 30 metres achieved a lower score (mean 1,584.5, standard deviation 436.7) in the IGT than the divers at 5 metres (mean 2,062.5, standard deviation 584.1). Age, body mass index, gender, or the number of previous dives did not affect performance in the IGT.

Conclusions: Our results suggest that gas narcosis may affect decision-making in scuba divers at 30 metres depth. This supports previous studies showing that gas narcosis is present at relatively shallow depths and shows that it may affect higher cognitive functions.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
深海狂喜:气体麻醉可能会影响水肺潜水员的决策。
简介:虽然气体麻醉对大多数进行深潜(大于 30 米)的潜水员来说并不陌生,但其影响在 30 米处往往被认为是微不足道或微妙的。然而,以前的研究表明,毒气麻醉可能会影响潜水员在通常被认为不受其影响的安全深度的潜水,但对于毒气麻醉对高级认知功能(如在 30 米相对较浅的水域中进行决策)的影响却知之甚少。决策能力受损可能会给多任务潜水员带来严重的安全问题:我们进行了一项研究,探讨气体麻醉对在水下呼吸压缩空气的潜水员决策的影响。潜水员(n = 22)被平均分为 5 米组和 30 米组。在水中,我们使用了配备爱荷华赌博任务(IGT)的水下平板电脑,这是一项著名的心理任务,用于评估决策障碍:结果:30 米潜水员的 IGT 得分(平均 1584.5 分,标准差 436.7 分)低于 5 米潜水员(平均 2062.5 分,标准差 584.1 分)。年龄、体重指数、性别或以前潜水的次数并不影响在 IGT 中的表现:我们的研究结果表明,毒气麻醉可能会影响水肺潜水员在 30 米深度的决策。这支持了之前的研究,这些研究表明气体麻醉在相对较浅的深度也会存在,并表明气体麻醉可能会影响较高的认知功能。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Diving and hyperbaric medicine
Diving and hyperbaric medicine 医学-公共卫生、环境卫生与职业卫生
CiteScore
1.70
自引率
22.20%
发文量
37
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Diving and Hyperbaric Medicine (DHM) is the combined journal of the South Pacific Underwater Medicine Society (SPUMS) and the European Underwater and Baromedical Society (EUBS). It seeks to publish papers of high quality on all aspects of diving and hyperbaric medicine of interest to diving medical professionals, physicians of all specialties, scientists, members of the diving and hyperbaric industries, and divers. Manuscripts must be offered exclusively to Diving and Hyperbaric Medicine, unless clearly authenticated copyright exemption accompaniesthe manuscript. All manuscripts will be subject to peer review. Accepted contributions will also be subject to editing.
期刊最新文献
Acoustic emission, an innovative diagnosis tool for therapeutic hyperbaric chambers: or how to requalify safely using pneumatic pressure test. Arterial dissection in scuba divers: a potential adverse manifestation of the physiological effects of immersion. Bispectral index with density spectral array (BIS-DSA) monitoring in a patient with inner ear and cerebral decompression sickness. Evaluation of a new hyperbaric oxygen ventilator during pressure-controlled ventilation. Hyperbaric medicine and climate footprint.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1