Diving and hyperbaric medicine最新文献

The authors have requested an update be made to the Acknowledgements statement in their article. The Acknowledgements should read: The authors would like to thank Senior Constable Scott Williams, Dr Chris Lawrence, Dr Andrew Reid, and Dr John Lippmann. The authors would also like to acknowledge and thank the support from the Tasmanian frontline agency representatives, and representatives from the Royal Hobart Hospital, Launceston General Hospital, North West Regional Hospital, Mersey Hospital, and Ochre Medical Group.

We report an unusual decompression sickness (DCS) incident in a commercial diving project. Eleven divers completed 91 dives to 23.5-36.2 m with bottom times ranging 23-67 min. The divers were breathing compressed air while immersed. Decompression was planned as surface decompression in a deck decompression chamber breathing oxygen typically for 15-30 min. Due to a technical error the divers breathed air rather than oxygen during the surface decompression procedure. Two divers suffered DCS. Both were recompressed on site with the same error resulting in them breathing compressed air rather than oxygen. One of them experienced a severe relapse with cardiovascular decompensation following recompression treatment. While DCS was expected due to the erroneous decompression procedures, it is noteworthy that only two incidents occurred during 91 dives with surface decompression breathing air instead of oxygen. Accounting for this error, the median omitted decompression time was 17 min (range 0-26 min) according to the Bühlmann ZHL-16C algorithm. These observations suggest that moderate omission of decompression time has a relatively small effect on DCS incidence rate. The other nine divers were interviewed in the weeks following completion of the project. None of them reported symptoms at the time, but five divers reported having experienced minor symptoms compatible with mild DCS during the project which was not reported until later.

Diving accidents result from a variety of causes including human error, inadequate health and fitness, environmental hazards and equipment problems. They usually involve a cascade of events resulting in the diver being injured or deceased. The accuracy and usefulness of a diving accident investigation relies on well-targeted interviews, good field investigation, evidence collection and preservation, and appropriate equipment assessment. In the event of a fatality, a thorough and targeted autopsy is indicated. Investigators should have the appropriate knowledge, training, skills and support systems to perform the required tasks. Relevant investigations include the victim's medical and diving history, the dive circumstances and likely accident scenario, management of the accident including rescue and first aid, equipment inspection and testing and a thorough postmortem examination conducted by a forensic pathologist with an awareness of the special requirements of a diving autopsy and the knowledge to correctly interpret the findings. A chain of events analysis can determine the likely accident scenario, identify shortcomings and inform countermeasures.

Introduction: Inhalation of high concentrations of carbon dioxide (CO₂) at atmospheric pressure can be toxic with dose-dependent effects on the cardiorespiratory system or the central nervous system. Exposure to both hyperbaric and hypobaric environments can result in decompression sickness (DCS). The effects of CO₂ on DCS are not well documented with conflicting results. The objective was to review the literature to clarify the effects of CO₂ inhalation on DCS in the context of hypobaric or hyperbaric exposure.

Methods: The systematic review included experimental animal and human studies in hyper- and hypobaric conditions evaluating the effects of CO₂ on bubble formation, denitrogenation or the occurrence of DCS. The search was based on MEDLINE and PubMed articles with no language or date restrictions and also included articles from the underwater and aviation medicine literature.

Results: Out of 43 articles, only 11 articles were retained and classified according to the criteria of hypo- or hyperbaric exposure, taking into account the duration of CO₂ inhalation in relation to exposure and distinguishing experimental work from studies conducted in humans.

Conclusions: Before or during a stay in hypobaric conditions, exposure to high concentrations of CO₂ favors bubble formation and the occurrence of DCS. In hyperbaric conditions, high CO₂ concentrations increase the occurrence of DCS when exposure occurs during the bottom phase at maximum pressure, whereas beneficial effects are observed when exposure occurs during decompression. These opposite effects depending on the timing of exposure could be related to 1) the physical properties of CO₂, a highly diffusible gas that can influence bubble formation, 2) vasomotor effects (vasodilation), and 3) anti-inflammatory effects (kinase-nuclear factor and heme oxygenase-1 pathways). The use of O₂-CO₂ breathing mixtures on the surface after diving may be an avenue worth exploring to prevent DCS.

Cardiac complications are a rare but potentially serious consequence of hyperbaric oxygen treatment (HBOT), resulting from increased blood pressure and decreased heart rate and cardiac output associated with treatment. These physiologic changes are generally well-tolerated by patients without preexisting cardiac conditions, although those with known or undetected cardiac disease may be more vulnerable to treatment complications. Currently, there are no universally accepted guidelines for pre-HBOT cardiac screening to identify these patients at heightened risk, leading to variability in practice patterns. In the absence of HBOT-specific evidence, screening protocols might be adapted from the diving medicine community; however, given the important differences in physiological stressors, these may not be entirely applicable to patients undergoing HBOT. Traditional cardiac investigations such as electro- and echo-cardiograms are limited in their ability to detect relevant risk modifying states in the pre-HBOT patient, stymieing their cost-effectiveness as routine tests. In the absence of strong evidence to support routine cardiac investigation, we argue that a comprehensive history and physical exam - tailored to identify high-risk patients based on clinical parameters - may serve as a more practical screening tool. While certain unique patient groups such as those undergoing dialysis or with implanted cardiac devices may warrant specialised assessment, thorough evaluation may be sufficient to identify many patients unlikely to benefit from cardiac investigation in the pre-HBOT setting. A clinical decision-making tool based on suggested low-risk and high-risk features is offered to guide the use of targeted cardiac investigation prior to HBOT.

Introduction: Central retinal artery occlusion (CRAO) presents suddenly causing painless loss of vision that is often significant. Meaningful improvement in vision occurs in only 8% of patients with spontaneous reperfusion. Hyperbaric oxygen treatment (HBOT) is considered to be of benefit if commenced before retinal infarction occurs. The Undersea and Hyperbaric Medical Society (UHMS) guidelines on the management of CRAO were last amended in 2019. This survey questioned Australian and New Zealand (ANZ) hyperbaric medicine units (HMUs) about the incidence of CRAO cases referred and compared their subsequent management against the UHMS guidelines.

Methods: An anonymous survey via SurveyMonkey® was sent to all 12 ANZ HMUs that treat emergency indications, allowing for multiple choice and free text answers regarding their management of CRAO.

Results: One-hundred and forty-six cases of CRAO were treated in ANZ HMUs over the last five years. Most (101/146) cases (69%) were initially treated at a pressure of 284 kPa. This was the area of greatest difference noted in CRAO management between the UHMS guidelines and ANZ practice.

Conclusions: Few ANZ HMUs strictly followed the UHMS guidelines. We suggest a more simplified management protocol as used by the majority of ANZ HMUs.

Introduction: Routine dipstick urinalysis is part of many dive medical assessment protocols. However, this has a significant chance of producing false-positive or false-negative results in asymptomatic and healthy individuals. Studies evaluating the value of urinalysis in dive medical assessments are limited.

Methods: All results from urinalysis as part of dive medical assessments of divers, submarines, and hyperbaric personnel of the Royal Netherlands Navy from 2013 to 2023 were included in this study. Additionally, any information regarding additional testing, referral, or test results concerning the aforementioned was collected.

Results: There were 5,899 assessments, resulting in 46 (0.8%) positive dipstick urinalysis results, predominantly microscopic haematuria. Females were significantly overrepresented, and revisions resulted in significantly more positive test results than initial assessments. Lastly, almost half of the cases were deemed fit to dive, while the other half were regarded as temporarily unfit. These cases required additional testing, and a urologist was consulted three times.

Conclusions: To our knowledge, this is the most extensive study evaluating urinalysis in dive medical assessments. In our military population, the incidence of positive test results is very low, and there have not been clinically relevant results over a period of 10 years. Therefore, routinely assessing urine in asymptomatic healthy military candidates is not cost-effective or efficacious. The authors advise taking a thorough history for fitness to dive assessments and only analysing urine when a clinical indication is present.

Blood alcohol concentrations above defined levels are detrimental to cognitive performance. Empirical and published evidence suggest that nitrogen narcosis is analogous to alcohol intoxication with both impairing prefrontal cortex function. Nitrogen narcosis is also known to have been a factor in fatal accidents. To examine the effects of nitrogen narcosis, a recent publication used the Iowa Gambling Task tool, to simulate dynamic real-life risky decision-making behaviour. If the reported outcomes are corroborated in larger rigorously designed studies it is likely to provide further evidence that divers may well experience the negative effects of a 'narcotic agent', even at relatively shallow depths. These deleterious effects may occur regardless of diving experience, aptitude or professional status. In 1872, English law made it an offence to be 'drunk' whilst in charge of horses, carriages, cattle and steam engines. Understanding the danger was easy, establishing who is 'drunk' in the eyes of the court required a legal definition. Driving above a 'legal limit' for alcohol was made illegal in the United Kingdom in 1967. The limit was set at 80 milligrams of alcohol per 100 millilitres of blood. It took just short of one hundred years to get from first introducing a restriction to specific activities, whilst under the influence of alcohol, to having a clear and well-defined enforceable law. The question surely is whether our modern society will tolerate another century before legally defining safe parameters for nitrogen narcosis?

Hyperbaric oxygen treatment (HBOT) can be utilised for necrotising soft tissue infections, clostridial myonecrosis (gas gangrene), crush injuries, acute traumatic ischaemia, delayed wound healing, and compromised skin grafts. Our case was a 17-month-old male patient with Noonan syndrome, idiopathic thrombocytopenic purpura, and bilateral undescended testicles. Haematoma and oedema developed in the scrotum and penis the day after bilateral orchiopexy and circumcision. Ischaemic appearances were observed on the penile and scrotal skin on the second postoperative day. Enoxaparin sodium and fresh frozen plasma were started on the recommendation of haematology. Hyperbaric oxygen treatment was initiated considering the possibility of tissue necrosis. We observed rapid healing within five days. We present this case to emphasise that HBOT may be considered as an additional treatment option in patients with similar conditions. To our knowledge, no similar cases have been reported in the literature.

We report a compressed air worker who had diffuse cutaneous decompression sickness with pain in his left shoulder and visual disturbance characteristic of migraine aura after only his third hyperbaric exposure. The maximum pressure was 253 kPa gauge with oxygen decompression using the Swanscombe Oxygen Decompression Table. He was found to have a very large right-to-left shunt across a 9 mm atrial septal defect. He had transcatheter closure of the defect but had some residual shunting with release of a Valsalva manoeuvre. Thirty-two other tunnel workers undertook the same pressure profile and activities in the same working conditions during the maintenance of a tunnel boring machine for a total of 233 similar exposures and were unaffected. As far as we are aware this is the first report of shunt-mediated decompression sickness in a hyperbaric tunnel worker in the United Kingdom and the second case reported worldwide. These cases suggest that shunt-mediated decompression sickness should be considered to be an occupational risk in modern compressed air working. A right-to-left shunt in a compressed air worker should be managed in accordance with established clinical guidance for divers.