Maria K Jaakkola, Maria Rantala, Anna Jalo, Teemu Saari, Jaakko Hentilä, Jatta S Helin, Tuuli A Nissinen, Olli Eskola, Johan Rajander, Kirsi A Virtanen, Jarna C Hannukainen, Francisco López-Picón, Riku Klén
{"title":"Segmentation of Dynamic Total-Body [<sup>18</sup>F]-FDG PET Images Using Unsupervised Clustering.","authors":"Maria K Jaakkola, Maria Rantala, Anna Jalo, Teemu Saari, Jaakko Hentilä, Jatta S Helin, Tuuli A Nissinen, Olli Eskola, Johan Rajander, Kirsi A Virtanen, Jarna C Hannukainen, Francisco López-Picón, Riku Klén","doi":"10.1155/2023/3819587","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Clustering time activity curves of PET images have been used to separate clinically relevant areas of the brain or tumours. However, PET image segmentation in multiorgan level is much less studied due to the available total-body data being limited to animal studies. Now, the new PET scanners providing the opportunity to acquire total-body PET scans also from humans are becoming more common, which opens plenty of new clinically interesting opportunities. Therefore, organ-level segmentation of PET images has important applications, yet it lacks sufficient research. In this proof of concept study, we evaluate if the previously used segmentation approaches are suitable for segmenting dynamic human total-body PET images in organ level. Our focus is on general-purpose unsupervised methods that are independent of external data and can be used for all tracers, organisms, and health conditions. Additional anatomical image modalities, such as CT or MRI, are not used, but the segmentation is done purely based on the dynamic PET images. The tested methods are commonly used building blocks of the more sophisticated methods rather than final methods as such, and our goal is to evaluate if these basic tools are suited for the arising human total-body PET image segmentation. First, we excluded methods that were computationally too demanding for the large datasets from human total-body PET scanners. These criteria filtered out most of the commonly used approaches, leaving only two clustering methods, <i>k</i>-means and Gaussian mixture model (GMM), for further analyses. We combined <i>k</i>-means with two different preprocessing approaches, namely, principal component analysis (PCA) and independent component analysis (ICA). Then, we selected a suitable number of clusters using 10 images. Finally, we tested how well the usable approaches segment the remaining PET images in organ level, highlight the best approaches together with their limitations, and discuss how further research could tackle the observed shortcomings. In this study, we utilised 40 total-body [<sup>18</sup>F] fluorodeoxyglucose PET images of rats to mimic the coming large human PET images and a few actual human total-body images to ensure that our conclusions from the rat data generalise to the human data. Our results show that ICA combined with <i>k</i>-means has weaker performance than the other two computationally usable approaches and that certain organs are easier to segment than others. While GMM performed sufficiently, it was by far the slowest one among the tested approaches, making <i>k</i>-means combined with PCA the most promising candidate for further development. However, even with the best methods, the mean Jaccard index was slightly below 0.5 for the easiest tested organ and below 0.2 for the most challenging organ. Thus, we conclude that there is a lack of accurate and computationally light general-purpose segmentation method that can analyse dynamic total-body PET images.</p>","PeriodicalId":47063,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Biomedical Imaging","volume":"2023 ","pages":"3819587"},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10715853/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Biomedical Imaging","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1155/2023/3819587","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Clustering time activity curves of PET images have been used to separate clinically relevant areas of the brain or tumours. However, PET image segmentation in multiorgan level is much less studied due to the available total-body data being limited to animal studies. Now, the new PET scanners providing the opportunity to acquire total-body PET scans also from humans are becoming more common, which opens plenty of new clinically interesting opportunities. Therefore, organ-level segmentation of PET images has important applications, yet it lacks sufficient research. In this proof of concept study, we evaluate if the previously used segmentation approaches are suitable for segmenting dynamic human total-body PET images in organ level. Our focus is on general-purpose unsupervised methods that are independent of external data and can be used for all tracers, organisms, and health conditions. Additional anatomical image modalities, such as CT or MRI, are not used, but the segmentation is done purely based on the dynamic PET images. The tested methods are commonly used building blocks of the more sophisticated methods rather than final methods as such, and our goal is to evaluate if these basic tools are suited for the arising human total-body PET image segmentation. First, we excluded methods that were computationally too demanding for the large datasets from human total-body PET scanners. These criteria filtered out most of the commonly used approaches, leaving only two clustering methods, k-means and Gaussian mixture model (GMM), for further analyses. We combined k-means with two different preprocessing approaches, namely, principal component analysis (PCA) and independent component analysis (ICA). Then, we selected a suitable number of clusters using 10 images. Finally, we tested how well the usable approaches segment the remaining PET images in organ level, highlight the best approaches together with their limitations, and discuss how further research could tackle the observed shortcomings. In this study, we utilised 40 total-body [18F] fluorodeoxyglucose PET images of rats to mimic the coming large human PET images and a few actual human total-body images to ensure that our conclusions from the rat data generalise to the human data. Our results show that ICA combined with k-means has weaker performance than the other two computationally usable approaches and that certain organs are easier to segment than others. While GMM performed sufficiently, it was by far the slowest one among the tested approaches, making k-means combined with PCA the most promising candidate for further development. However, even with the best methods, the mean Jaccard index was slightly below 0.5 for the easiest tested organ and below 0.2 for the most challenging organ. Thus, we conclude that there is a lack of accurate and computationally light general-purpose segmentation method that can analyse dynamic total-body PET images.
对 PET 图像的时间活动曲线进行聚类已被用于分离临床相关的大脑或肿瘤区域。然而,由于现有的全身数据仅限于动物研究,因此对多器官水平 PET 图像分割的研究要少得多。现在,新型 PET 扫描仪越来越普遍,可以获取人体全身 PET 扫描数据,这为临床带来了许多新的有趣机会。因此,PET 图像的器官级分割具有重要的应用价值,但目前还缺乏足够的研究。在这项概念验证研究中,我们评估了之前使用的分割方法是否适用于器官级动态人体全身 PET 图像的分割。我们的重点是通用无监督方法,这些方法不受外部数据的影响,可用于所有示踪剂、生物体和健康状况。我们不使用 CT 或 MRI 等其他解剖图像模式,而是纯粹根据动态 PET 图像进行分割。我们的目标是评估这些基本工具是否适合所产生的人体全身 PET 图像分割。首先,我们排除了对人体全身 PET 扫描仪的大型数据集计算要求过高的方法。这些标准过滤掉了大多数常用的方法,只留下两种聚类方法,即 k-means 和高斯混合模型 (GMM),供进一步分析。我们将 k-means 与两种不同的预处理方法相结合,即主成分分析 (PCA) 和独立成分分析 (ICA)。然后,我们使用 10 幅图像选择了合适的聚类数量。最后,我们测试了可用方法在器官水平上分割剩余 PET 图像的效果,强调了最佳方法及其局限性,并讨论了如何通过进一步研究解决观察到的不足之处。在这项研究中,我们使用了 40 幅大鼠全身 [18F] 氟脱氧葡萄糖 PET 图像来模拟即将出现的大型人体 PET 图像,并使用了一些实际的人体全身图像,以确保我们从大鼠数据中得出的结论能够推广到人体数据中。我们的结果表明,ICA 结合 k-means 的性能比其他两种可计算的方法要弱,而且某些器官比其他器官更容易分割。虽然 GMM 的性能足够好,但它是迄今为止测试方法中速度最慢的一种,因此结合 PCA 的 k-means 是最有希望进一步发展的候选方法。不过,即使使用了最好的方法,最容易测试的器官的平均 Jaccard 指数也略低于 0.5,而最具挑战性的器官的平均 Jaccard 指数则低于 0.2。因此,我们得出结论,目前还缺乏一种能分析动态全身 PET 图像的准确且计算量小的通用分割方法。
期刊介绍:
The International Journal of Biomedical Imaging is managed by a board of editors comprising internationally renowned active researchers. The journal is freely accessible online and also offered for purchase in print format. It employs a web-based review system to ensure swift turnaround times while maintaining high standards. In addition to regular issues, special issues are organized by guest editors. The subject areas covered include (but are not limited to):
Digital radiography and tomosynthesis
X-ray computed tomography (CT)
Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)
Single photon emission computed tomography (SPECT)
Positron emission tomography (PET)
Ultrasound imaging
Diffuse optical tomography, coherence, fluorescence, bioluminescence tomography, impedance tomography
Neutron imaging for biomedical applications
Magnetic and optical spectroscopy, and optical biopsy
Optical, electron, scanning tunneling/atomic force microscopy
Small animal imaging
Functional, cellular, and molecular imaging
Imaging assays for screening and molecular analysis
Microarray image analysis and bioinformatics
Emerging biomedical imaging techniques
Imaging modality fusion
Biomedical imaging instrumentation
Biomedical image processing, pattern recognition, and analysis
Biomedical image visualization, compression, transmission, and storage
Imaging and modeling related to systems biology and systems biomedicine
Applied mathematics, applied physics, and chemistry related to biomedical imaging
Grid-enabling technology for biomedical imaging and informatics