Comparison of diagnostic routines for suspected Alzheimer's disease patients in US-American and German primary care.

IF 2.3 Q3 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY Neurodegenerative disease management Pub Date : 2023-10-01 Epub Date: 2023-12-08 DOI:10.2217/nmt-2023-0023
Felix Menne, Timo Grimmer, Carola G Schipke
{"title":"Comparison of diagnostic routines for suspected Alzheimer's disease patients in US-American and German primary care.","authors":"Felix Menne, Timo Grimmer, Carola G Schipke","doi":"10.2217/nmt-2023-0023","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Aim:</b> Thorough diagnostics are a prerequisite for the optimal treatment of Alzheimer's disease (AD). Biomarker-based diagnostics are standard in academia, data on practitioners' diagnostic workups is scarce. <b>Materials & methods:</b> Surveys in German and US healthcare providers (HCP) were conducted regarding diagnostics in presumed AD patients. A subsample of 153 German and 88 US professionals was analyzed in detail. <b>Results:</b> Fewer German physicians conduct AD diagnostics themselves compared with US colleagues (67% vs 99%; p < 0.0001). German doctors more often order diagnostics at other institutions (65% vs 45%; p < 0.005). No significant differences were found regarding the type of diagnostics ordered at other institutions. <b>Conclusion:</b> Diagnostic routines for suspected AD patients differ between German and US-American healthcare providers.</p>","PeriodicalId":19114,"journal":{"name":"Neurodegenerative disease management","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Neurodegenerative disease management","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2217/nmt-2023-0023","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/12/8 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aim: Thorough diagnostics are a prerequisite for the optimal treatment of Alzheimer's disease (AD). Biomarker-based diagnostics are standard in academia, data on practitioners' diagnostic workups is scarce. Materials & methods: Surveys in German and US healthcare providers (HCP) were conducted regarding diagnostics in presumed AD patients. A subsample of 153 German and 88 US professionals was analyzed in detail. Results: Fewer German physicians conduct AD diagnostics themselves compared with US colleagues (67% vs 99%; p < 0.0001). German doctors more often order diagnostics at other institutions (65% vs 45%; p < 0.005). No significant differences were found regarding the type of diagnostics ordered at other institutions. Conclusion: Diagnostic routines for suspected AD patients differ between German and US-American healthcare providers.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
美国和德国基层医疗机构对疑似阿尔茨海默病患者的诊断程序比较。
目的:全面诊断是阿尔茨海默病(AD)最佳治疗的先决条件。以生物标志物为基础的诊断是学术界的标准,但有关从业人员诊断工作的数据却很少。材料与方法:对德国和美国的医疗保健提供者(HCP)进行了有关假定的 AD 患者诊断的调查。对 153 名德国和 88 名美国专业人员的子样本进行了详细分析。结果:与美国同行相比,德国医生自己进行注意力缺失症诊断的人数较少(67% 对 99%;P 结论:与美国同行相比,德国医生自己进行注意力缺失症诊断的人数较少:德国和美国医疗服务提供者对疑似注意力缺失症患者的诊断程序有所不同。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
35
期刊最新文献
Amyloid-related imaging abnormalities (ARIA) and their radiological, biological and clinical characteristics: a plain language summary Effects and mechanisms of computerized cognitive training in Huntington's disease: protocol for a pilot study Medicinal cannabis in neurodegenerative disorders: an open label, dose finding, safety and efficacy study. Glycine and clozapine: potential relevance for the treatment of Parkinson's disease. Patient-reported benefits from nabiximols treatment in multiple sclerosis-related spasticity exceed conventional measures.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1