首页 > 最新文献

Neurodegenerative disease management最新文献

英文 中文
Investigation of nonmotor symptoms and their clinical correlates in patients with Parkinson's disease.
IF 2.3 Q3 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY Pub Date : 2025-03-17 DOI: 10.1080/17582024.2025.2468145
H Onder, S Comoglu

Background: In this study, we aimed to investigate the clinical features of a large group of patients with Parkinson's disease (PD), paying particular attention to the nonmotor symptom (NMS) load. Secondly, we aimed to investigate the clinical correlates of NMSs using the results of various clinical assessments.

Methods: Data from all PD patients who visited our movement disorders clinic between January 2023 and March 2024 were retrospectively reviewed. We included the data of all patients whose information regarding clinical features and extensive scale results were available.

Results: Overall, we included data from 285 PD patients with a mean age of 64.5 ± 10.0 years (F/M = 119/166). The median scores of the MDS-UPDRS subparts were 9 for MDS-UPDRS-1 and 30 for MDS-UPDRS-3 (off). The median NMSS score was 38 (range: 229), and 46% of the patients had severe to very severe disease in terms of NMS burden. The regression analyses revealed the MDS-UPDRS 3 score, FES-I score, and RBD (0.9772 + 0.453*MDS-UPDRS 3 + 0.724 * FES-I + 15.192*RBD) as predictors of the NMS scale.

Conclusions: We found a very high NMS burden in our PD cohort. Remarkably, RBD, motor stage, and concern about falling were found to correlate with NMS load.

{"title":"Investigation of nonmotor symptoms and their clinical correlates in patients with Parkinson's disease.","authors":"H Onder, S Comoglu","doi":"10.1080/17582024.2025.2468145","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/17582024.2025.2468145","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>In this study, we aimed to investigate the clinical features of a large group of patients with Parkinson's disease (PD), paying particular attention to the nonmotor symptom (NMS) load. Secondly, we aimed to investigate the clinical correlates of NMSs using the results of various clinical assessments.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Data from all PD patients who visited our movement disorders clinic between January 2023 and March 2024 were retrospectively reviewed. We included the data of all patients whose information regarding clinical features and extensive scale results were available.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Overall, we included data from 285 PD patients with a mean age of 64.5 ± 10.0 years (F/M = 119/166). The median scores of the MDS-UPDRS subparts were 9 for MDS-UPDRS-1 and 30 for MDS-UPDRS-3 (off). The median NMSS score was 38 (range: 229), and 46% of the patients had severe to very severe disease in terms of NMS burden. The regression analyses revealed the MDS-UPDRS 3 score, FES-I score, and RBD (0.9772 + 0.453*MDS-UPDRS 3 + 0.724 * FES-I + 15.192*RBD) as predictors of the NMS scale.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>We found a very high NMS burden in our PD cohort. Remarkably, RBD, motor stage, and concern about falling were found to correlate with NMS load.</p>","PeriodicalId":19114,"journal":{"name":"Neurodegenerative disease management","volume":" ","pages":"1-9"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3,"publicationDate":"2025-03-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143648187","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Detailed investigation of the levodopa response rates in distinct motor subscores in Parkinson's disease patients with and without STN-DBS.
IF 2.3 Q3 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY Pub Date : 2025-02-24 DOI: 10.1080/17582024.2025.2460420
H Onder, Meral Oksuz, S Comoglu

Aim: To investigate the levodopa response (LDR) in a detailed manner in Parkinson's disease (PD) patients with and without STN-DBS. In this respect, we sought to evaluate the effect of LDR on distinct motor symptoms one by one.

Methods: The data of all consecutive PD patients who visited our movement disorders outpatient clinics at Etlik City Hospital between January 2023 and January 2024 were retrospectively evaluated. We enrolled patients whose full clinical assessments were available. The LDR was evaluated according to a previously described method.

Results: We included 194 PD patients in this study [49 STN-DBS (+) patients, 145 STN-DBS (-) patients]. The disease duration was greater in the STN-DBS group, as expected (12 y, 5 y, p = 0.00). The LDR ratios for the total score and subitem scores of the MDS-UPDRS-3 were similar between the patient groups. All the subscores of the MDS-UPDRS-3 were significantly lower for the 'ON' medication state than for the 'OFF' medication state in both patient groups.

Conclusions: We demonstrated similar LDR rates for all motor subitems in patients with and without STN-DBS in a detailed manner. Our findings demonstrate the benefit of dopaminergic treatment on distinct motor symptoms in patients with STN-DBS.

{"title":"Detailed investigation of the levodopa response rates in distinct motor subscores in Parkinson's disease patients with and without STN-DBS.","authors":"H Onder, Meral Oksuz, S Comoglu","doi":"10.1080/17582024.2025.2460420","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/17582024.2025.2460420","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aim: </strong>To investigate the levodopa response (LDR) in a detailed manner in Parkinson's disease (PD) patients with and without STN-DBS. In this respect, we sought to evaluate the effect of LDR on distinct motor symptoms one by one.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The data of all consecutive PD patients who visited our movement disorders outpatient clinics at Etlik City Hospital between January 2023 and January 2024 were retrospectively evaluated. We enrolled patients whose full clinical assessments were available. The LDR was evaluated according to a previously described method.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We included 194 PD patients in this study [49 STN-DBS (+) patients, 145 STN-DBS (-) patients]. The disease duration was greater in the STN-DBS group, as expected (12 y, 5 y, <i>p</i> = 0.00). The LDR ratios for the total score and subitem scores of the MDS-UPDRS-3 were similar between the patient groups. All the subscores of the MDS-UPDRS-3 were significantly lower for the 'ON' medication state than for the 'OFF' medication state in both patient groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>We demonstrated similar LDR rates for all motor subitems in patients with and without STN-DBS in a detailed manner. Our findings demonstrate the benefit of dopaminergic treatment on distinct motor symptoms in patients with STN-DBS.</p>","PeriodicalId":19114,"journal":{"name":"Neurodegenerative disease management","volume":" ","pages":"1-9"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3,"publicationDate":"2025-02-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143483720","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Correction.
IF 2.3 Q3 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY Pub Date : 2025-02-20 DOI: 10.1080/17582024.2025.2468543
{"title":"Correction.","authors":"","doi":"10.1080/17582024.2025.2468543","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/17582024.2025.2468543","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":19114,"journal":{"name":"Neurodegenerative disease management","volume":" ","pages":"1"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3,"publicationDate":"2025-02-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143458701","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Economic evaluation of mHealth solutions in PD: where do we stand?
IF 2.3 Q3 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY Pub Date : 2025-02-18 DOI: 10.1080/17582024.2025.2467020
Foivos S Kanellos, Ermioni Petkou, Spyridon Konitsiotis, Yannis V Simos, Lampros Lakkas, Dimitrios Peschos, Konstantinos I Tsamis
{"title":"Economic evaluation of mHealth solutions in PD: where do we stand?","authors":"Foivos S Kanellos, Ermioni Petkou, Spyridon Konitsiotis, Yannis V Simos, Lampros Lakkas, Dimitrios Peschos, Konstantinos I Tsamis","doi":"10.1080/17582024.2025.2467020","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/17582024.2025.2467020","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":19114,"journal":{"name":"Neurodegenerative disease management","volume":" ","pages":"1-4"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3,"publicationDate":"2025-02-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143441504","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Advances in the management of Alzheimer's disease.
IF 2.3 Q3 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY Pub Date : 2025-02-06 DOI: 10.1080/17582024.2025.2463313
Maheen Nawaz, Ahmed Ali Khan, Muhammad Shaheer Bin Faheem
{"title":"Advances in the management of Alzheimer's disease.","authors":"Maheen Nawaz, Ahmed Ali Khan, Muhammad Shaheer Bin Faheem","doi":"10.1080/17582024.2025.2463313","DOIUrl":"10.1080/17582024.2025.2463313","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":19114,"journal":{"name":"Neurodegenerative disease management","volume":" ","pages":"1-3"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3,"publicationDate":"2025-02-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143256037","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
A plain language summary of a study exploring the experiences of people with relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis: what symptoms and impacts of the disease matter most and how can they be evaluated better?
IF 2.3 Q3 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY Pub Date : 2025-01-23 DOI: 10.1080/17582024.2024.2441068
Amy Barrett, Oyebimpe Olayinka-Amao, Tjalf Ziemssen, Trishna Bharadia, Christian Henke, Paul Kamudoni
{"title":"A plain language summary of a study exploring the experiences of people with relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis: what symptoms and impacts of the disease matter most and how can they be evaluated better?","authors":"Amy Barrett, Oyebimpe Olayinka-Amao, Tjalf Ziemssen, Trishna Bharadia, Christian Henke, Paul Kamudoni","doi":"10.1080/17582024.2024.2441068","DOIUrl":"10.1080/17582024.2024.2441068","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":19114,"journal":{"name":"Neurodegenerative disease management","volume":" ","pages":"1-8"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3,"publicationDate":"2025-01-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143028912","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Real world effectiveness, persistence, tolerability, and safety of ofatumumab in clinical practice. ofatumumab在临床实践中的有效性、持久性、耐受性和安全性。
IF 2.3 Q3 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY Pub Date : 2025-01-21 DOI: 10.1080/17582024.2025.2452150
Moein Amin, Tucker Harvey, Dan Michael Pineda, Ming-Hui Tai, Qiujun Shao, Brandon Brown, Abhijit Gadkari, Brandon Moss, Devon S Conway, Carrie M Hersh

Aims: To describe the 12-month effectiveness, persistence, tolerability, and safety of ofatumumab (OMB), a highly effective disease-modifying therapy (DMT) for relapsing multiple sclerosis (MS), in a real-world MS population.

Patients & methods: Electronic medical records of patients starting OMB from October 2020 to August 2022 at two comprehensive MS centers were reviewed. Demographics and disease characteristics and 6- and 12-month clinical, patient-reported, and radiologic outcome measures were analyzed.

Results: A total of 175 patients started OMB with mean age 44.9 (SD 10.4) and disease duration 13.6 (SD 9.6) years. The cohort was 74% female, included 81% White and 13% Black American patients, and consisted of 80% relapsing-remitting MS or clinically isolated syndrome. Most (87%) had prior DMT exposure with 38% switching from high efficacy DMT. Over 12 months, 9.7% discontinued OMB (mean 117 days, SD 99.2), with tolerability issues being the most common reason. Thirty-nine (22%) had relapses in the year before starting OMB. By 12 months, only 1 relapse had occurred after approximately 4 months post-treatment initiation.

Discussion: This real-world study demonstrated that OMB is highly effective with robust persistence and good safety and tolerability by 12-month follow-up. Further analyses are planned to examine longer-term outcomes.

目的:描述ofatumumab (OMB)在现实世界多发性硬化症人群中12个月的有效性、持久性、耐受性和安全性,ofatumumab是一种治疗复发性多发性硬化症(MS)的高效疾病修饰疗法(DMT)。患者与方法:对两家综合多发性硬化症中心从2020年10月至2022年8月开始实施OMB的患者的电子病历进行了回顾。人口统计学和疾病特征以及6个月和12个月的临床、患者报告和放射学结果测量进行了分析。结果:共有175例患者开始OMB,平均年龄44.9岁(SD 10.4),病程13.6年(SD 9.6)。该队列74%为女性,包括81%的白人和13%的黑人美国患者,80%为复发缓解型MS或临床孤立综合征。大多数(87%)患者先前有DMT暴露,38%的患者从高效DMT转换。在12个月内,9.7%的患者停用了OMB(平均117天,SD 99.2),其中耐受性问题是最常见的原因。39例(22%)在实施OMB前一年复发。到12个月时,只有1例复发发生在治疗开始后大约4个月。讨论:这项现实世界的研究表明,经过12个月的随访,OMB具有很强的持久性和良好的安全性和耐受性。计划进一步分析长期结果。
{"title":"Real world effectiveness, persistence, tolerability, and safety of ofatumumab in clinical practice.","authors":"Moein Amin, Tucker Harvey, Dan Michael Pineda, Ming-Hui Tai, Qiujun Shao, Brandon Brown, Abhijit Gadkari, Brandon Moss, Devon S Conway, Carrie M Hersh","doi":"10.1080/17582024.2025.2452150","DOIUrl":"10.1080/17582024.2025.2452150","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aims: </strong>To describe the 12-month effectiveness, persistence, tolerability, and safety of ofatumumab (OMB), a highly effective disease-modifying therapy (DMT) for relapsing multiple sclerosis (MS), in a real-world MS population.</p><p><strong>Patients & methods: </strong>Electronic medical records of patients starting OMB from October 2020 to August 2022 at two comprehensive MS centers were reviewed. Demographics and disease characteristics and 6- and 12-month clinical, patient-reported, and radiologic outcome measures were analyzed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 175 patients started OMB with mean age 44.9 (SD 10.4) and disease duration 13.6 (SD 9.6) years. The cohort was 74% female, included 81% White and 13% Black American patients, and consisted of 80% relapsing-remitting MS or clinically isolated syndrome. Most (87%) had prior DMT exposure with 38% switching from high efficacy DMT. Over 12 months, 9.7% discontinued OMB (mean 117 days, SD 99.2), with tolerability issues being the most common reason. Thirty-nine (22%) had relapses in the year before starting OMB. By 12 months, only 1 relapse had occurred after approximately 4 months post-treatment initiation.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>This real-world study demonstrated that OMB is highly effective with robust persistence and good safety and tolerability by 12-month follow-up. Further analyses are planned to examine longer-term outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":19114,"journal":{"name":"Neurodegenerative disease management","volume":" ","pages":"1-10"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3,"publicationDate":"2025-01-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143009072","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Friedreich ataxia: what can we learn from non-GAA repeat mutations? 弗里德里希共济失调:我们能从非GAA重复突变中学到什么?
IF 2.3 Q3 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY Pub Date : 2025-01-15 DOI: 10.1080/17582024.2025.2452147
David R Lynch, M Shen, Robert B Wilson

Friedreich ataxia (FRDA) is a slowly progressive neurological disease resulting from decreased levels of the protein frataxin, a small mitochondrial protein that facilitates the synthesis of iron-sulfur clusters in the mitochondrion. It is caused by GAA (guanine-adenine-adenine) repeat expansions in the FXN gene in 96% of patients, with 4% of patients carrying other mutations (missense, nonsense, deletion) in the FXN gene. Compound heterozygote patients with one expanded GAA allele and a non-GAA repeat mutation can have subtle differences in phenotype from typical FRDA, including, in patients with selected missense mutations, both more severe features and less severe features in the same patient. In this review, we propose explanations for such phenotypes based on the potential for activities of frataxin other than enhancement of iron-sulfur cluster synthesis, as well as crucial future experiments for fully understanding the role of frataxin in cells.

弗里德赖希共济失调(FRDA)是一种缓慢进展的神经系统疾病,由卵黄蛋白水平下降引起,卵黄蛋白是一种促进线粒体中铁硫簇合成的小线粒体蛋白。它是由96%的患者FXN基因中的GAA(鸟嘌呤-腺嘌呤-腺嘌呤)重复扩增引起的,4%的患者在FXN基因中携带其他突变(错义、无义、缺失)。具有一个扩增的GAA等位基因和一个非GAA重复突变的复合杂合子患者在表型上可能与典型的FRDA有细微的差异,包括,在选择错义突变的患者中,同一患者具有较严重的特征和较不严重的特征。在这篇综述中,我们提出了基于frataxin活性的解释,而不是增强铁硫簇合成,以及未来的关键实验,以充分了解frataxin在细胞中的作用。
{"title":"Friedreich ataxia: what can we learn from non-GAA repeat mutations?","authors":"David R Lynch, M Shen, Robert B Wilson","doi":"10.1080/17582024.2025.2452147","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1080/17582024.2025.2452147","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Friedreich ataxia (FRDA) is a slowly progressive neurological disease resulting from decreased levels of the protein frataxin, a small mitochondrial protein that facilitates the synthesis of iron-sulfur clusters in the mitochondrion. It is caused by GAA (guanine-adenine-adenine) repeat expansions in the <i>FXN</i> gene in 96% of patients, with 4% of patients carrying other mutations (missense, nonsense, deletion) in the <i>FXN</i> gene. Compound heterozygote patients with one expanded GAA allele and a non-GAA repeat mutation can have subtle differences in phenotype from typical FRDA, including, in patients with selected missense mutations, both more severe features and less severe features in the same patient. In this review, we propose explanations for such phenotypes based on the potential for activities of frataxin other than enhancement of iron-sulfur cluster synthesis, as well as crucial future experiments for fully understanding the role of frataxin in cells.</p>","PeriodicalId":19114,"journal":{"name":"Neurodegenerative disease management","volume":" ","pages":"1-10"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3,"publicationDate":"2025-01-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142984232","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Measuring fatigue in people with multiple sclerosis - which questionnaire should be used? A Plain Language Summary of Publication. 测量多发性硬化症患者的疲劳程度--应使用哪种问卷?通俗易懂的出版物摘要。
IF 2.3 Q3 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY Pub Date : 2024-02-01 Epub Date: 2024-03-19 DOI: 10.2217/nmt-2023-0034
Paul Kamudoni, Jeffrey Johns, Karon F Cook, Rana Salem, Sam Salek, Jana Raab, Rod Middleton, Christian Henke, Dagmar Amtmann

What is this summary about?: This summary explains the findings of a recent study that compared different questionnaires used by doctors to measure levels of fatigue in people with multiple sclerosis (MS). The aim of the study was to find out which questionnaire doctors should use to measure fatigue in people with MS in the future. Fatigue, which can be described as the overwhelming feeling of tiredness or exhaustion, is a very common symptom of MS. For the majority of people with MS, fatigue is one of the worst symptoms of MS, so it is essential that doctors can measure it accurately. Currently, people with MS are asked to complete questionnaires so that their care team can see the effect of fatigue on their day-to-day lives. There are many questionnaires that are used to measure fatigue in people with MS. It would be valuable to come to an agreement, based on evidence from research like this study, on which questionnaire is the most appropriate for measuring fatigue in both research and healthcare settings. This study compared a questionnaire called the PROMIS® Fatigue (MS) 8a, referred to throughout this summary as the PROMIS® MS Fatigue Short Form, with two of the most commonly used questionnaires: the Fatigue Severity Scale (FSS) and the Modified Fatigue Impact Scale (MFIS). The questionnaires were compared to see which one should be recommended to doctors for measuring fatigue in people with MS.

What are the key takeaways?: It was found that while all three questionnaires were good, the PROMIS® MS Fatigue Short Form questionnaire was better than the other two questionnaires at showing differences in levels of fatigue between people with MS. The PROMIS® MS Fatigue Short Form was also found to be better than the Fatigue Severity Scale (FSS) at showing changes in the person with MS's level of fatigue. The PROMIS® MS Fatigue Short Form questionnaire may help people with MS to better communicate challenges with their fatigue to their doctors.

What was the main conclusion reported by the researchers?: The study suggests that the PROMIS® MS Fatigue Short Form questionnaire is a helpful tool for doctors and people with MS to measure fatigue.

本摘要说明了近期一项研究的结果,该研究比较了医生用于测量多发性硬化症(MS)患者疲劳程度的不同问卷。这项研究的目的是找出医生今后应该使用哪种问卷来测量多发性硬化症患者的疲劳程度。疲劳可以被描述为一种难以承受的疲倦或精疲力竭的感觉,是多发性硬化症的一种非常常见的症状。对于大多数多发性硬化症患者来说,疲劳是多发性硬化症最严重的症状之一,因此医生必须对其进行准确测量。目前,多发性硬化症患者需要填写调查问卷,以便护理团队了解疲劳对其日常生活的影响。用于测量多发性硬化症患者疲劳程度的问卷有很多。根据本研究等研究的证据,就哪种问卷最适合在研究和医疗环境中测量疲劳达成一致是非常有价值的。本研究将 PROMIS® 疲劳(MS)8a(在本摘要中称为 PROMIS® MS 疲劳简表)问卷与两种最常用的问卷:疲劳严重程度量表(FSS)和改良疲劳影响量表(MFIS)进行了比较。对这两种问卷进行了比较,以确定应向医生推荐哪一种问卷来测量多发性硬化症患者的疲劳程度:研究发现,虽然这三种问卷都不错,但在显示多发性硬化症患者疲劳程度差异方面,PROMIS® 多发性硬化症疲劳简表问卷优于其他两种问卷。在显示多发性硬化症患者疲劳程度的变化方面,PROMIS® 多发性硬化症疲劳简表也优于疲劳严重程度量表(FSS)。PROMIS®多发性硬化症疲劳简表问卷可以帮助多发性硬化症患者更好地向医生表达他们在疲劳方面遇到的挑战:研究表明,PROMIS® 多发性硬化症疲劳简表问卷是医生和多发性硬化症患者测量疲劳的有效工具。
{"title":"Measuring fatigue in people with multiple sclerosis - which questionnaire should be used? A Plain Language Summary of Publication.","authors":"Paul Kamudoni, Jeffrey Johns, Karon F Cook, Rana Salem, Sam Salek, Jana Raab, Rod Middleton, Christian Henke, Dagmar Amtmann","doi":"10.2217/nmt-2023-0034","DOIUrl":"10.2217/nmt-2023-0034","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>What is this summary about?: </strong>This summary explains the findings of a recent study that compared different questionnaires used by doctors to measure levels of fatigue in people with multiple sclerosis (MS). The aim of the study was to find out which questionnaire doctors should use to measure fatigue in people with MS in the future. Fatigue, which can be described as the overwhelming feeling of tiredness or exhaustion, is a very common symptom of MS. For the majority of people with MS, fatigue is one of the worst symptoms of MS, so it is essential that doctors can measure it accurately. Currently, people with MS are asked to complete questionnaires so that their care team can see the effect of fatigue on their day-to-day lives. There are many questionnaires that are used to measure fatigue in people with MS. It would be valuable to come to an agreement, based on evidence from research like this study, on which questionnaire is the most appropriate for measuring fatigue in both research and healthcare settings. This study compared a questionnaire called the PROMIS<sup>®</sup> Fatigue (MS) 8a, referred to throughout this summary as the PROMIS<sup>®</sup> MS Fatigue Short Form, with two of the most commonly used questionnaires: the Fatigue Severity Scale (FSS) and the Modified Fatigue Impact Scale (MFIS). The questionnaires were compared to see which one should be recommended to doctors for measuring fatigue in people with MS.</p><p><strong>What are the key takeaways?: </strong>It was found that while all three questionnaires were good, the PROMIS<sup>®</sup> MS Fatigue Short Form questionnaire was better than the other two questionnaires at showing differences in levels of fatigue between people with MS. The PROMIS<sup>®</sup> MS Fatigue Short Form was also found to be better than the Fatigue Severity Scale (FSS) at showing changes in the person with MS's level of fatigue. The PROMIS<sup>®</sup> MS Fatigue Short Form questionnaire may help people with MS to better communicate challenges with their fatigue to their doctors.</p><p><strong>What was the main conclusion reported by the researchers?: </strong>The study suggests that the PROMIS<sup>®</sup> MS Fatigue Short Form questionnaire is a helpful tool for doctors and people with MS to measure fatigue.</p>","PeriodicalId":19114,"journal":{"name":"Neurodegenerative disease management","volume":" ","pages":"5-9"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3,"publicationDate":"2024-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11244694/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"140158616","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Welcome to Volume 14 of Neurodegenerative Disease Management. 欢迎阅读《神经退行性疾病管理》第 14 卷。
IF 2.6 Q3 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY Pub Date : 2024-02-01 Epub Date: 2024-02-29 DOI: 10.2217/nmt-2023-0045
Afra Paleel
{"title":"Welcome to Volume 14 of <i>Neurodegenerative Disease Management</i>.","authors":"Afra Paleel","doi":"10.2217/nmt-2023-0045","DOIUrl":"10.2217/nmt-2023-0045","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":19114,"journal":{"name":"Neurodegenerative disease management","volume":" ","pages":"1-4"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6,"publicationDate":"2024-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"139990705","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
期刊
Neurodegenerative disease management
全部 Acc. Chem. Res. ACS Applied Bio Materials ACS Appl. Electron. Mater. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces ACS Appl. Nano Mater. ACS Appl. Polym. Mater. ACS BIOMATER-SCI ENG ACS Catal. ACS Cent. Sci. ACS Chem. Biol. ACS Chemical Health & Safety ACS Chem. Neurosci. ACS Comb. Sci. ACS Earth Space Chem. ACS Energy Lett. ACS Infect. Dis. ACS Macro Lett. ACS Mater. Lett. ACS Med. Chem. Lett. ACS Nano ACS Omega ACS Photonics ACS Sens. ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. ACS Synth. Biol. Anal. Chem. BIOCHEMISTRY-US Bioconjugate Chem. BIOMACROMOLECULES Chem. Res. Toxicol. Chem. Rev. Chem. Mater. CRYST GROWTH DES ENERG FUEL Environ. Sci. Technol. Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. IND ENG CHEM RES Inorg. Chem. J. Agric. Food. Chem. J. Chem. Eng. Data J. Chem. Educ. J. Chem. Inf. Model. J. Chem. Theory Comput. J. Med. Chem. J. Nat. Prod. J PROTEOME RES J. Am. Chem. Soc. LANGMUIR MACROMOLECULES Mol. Pharmaceutics Nano Lett. Org. Lett. ORG PROCESS RES DEV ORGANOMETALLICS J. Org. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. A J. Phys. Chem. B J. Phys. Chem. C J. Phys. Chem. Lett. Analyst Anal. Methods Biomater. Sci. Catal. Sci. Technol. Chem. Commun. Chem. Soc. Rev. CHEM EDUC RES PRACT CRYSTENGCOMM Dalton Trans. Energy Environ. Sci. ENVIRON SCI-NANO ENVIRON SCI-PROC IMP ENVIRON SCI-WAT RES Faraday Discuss. Food Funct. Green Chem. Inorg. Chem. Front. Integr. Biol. J. Anal. At. Spectrom. J. Mater. Chem. A J. Mater. Chem. B J. Mater. Chem. C Lab Chip Mater. Chem. Front. Mater. Horiz. MEDCHEMCOMM Metallomics Mol. Biosyst. Mol. Syst. Des. Eng. Nanoscale Nanoscale Horiz. Nat. Prod. Rep. New J. Chem. Org. Biomol. Chem. Org. Chem. Front. PHOTOCH PHOTOBIO SCI PCCP Polym. Chem.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1