A Prospective Study of Graft Repositioning over Flap Technique for Reconstruction of Fingertip Amputation.

IF 0.5 Q4 SURGERY Journal of Hand Surgery-Asian-Pacific Volume Pub Date : 2023-12-01 Epub Date: 2023-12-05 DOI:10.1142/S2424835523500704
Nitin Kaladagi, Raj Kumar Manas
{"title":"A Prospective Study of Graft Repositioning over Flap Technique for Reconstruction of Fingertip Amputation.","authors":"Nitin Kaladagi, Raj Kumar Manas","doi":"10.1142/S2424835523500704","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background:</b> Replantation of digital tip amputations, especially Allen III and IV, is challenging for hand surgeons as it requires a high level of microsurgical expertise and fine instruments. The graft repositioning over flap (GRF) technique is a simple and reliable procedure that provides length, sensation and nail growth and GRF has become popular in the last few years. The aim of this study is to report the short-term outcomes of the GRF technique. <b>Methods:</b> This is a prospective study of all patients who underwent a GRF reconstruction for Allen III and IV digital amputations at our hospital over a 12-month period. In addition to demographic data and injury details, we collected outcomes data with regard to flap and nailbed graft survival, capillary refill time, nail growth, sensation (2-point discrimination), bone union and gain in length of digit compared to length at injury. <b>Results:</b> Twenty patients underwent GRF reconstruction of digital amputation. They included 18 men and 2 women with an average age of 29 years. The thumb was the most frequently injured digit (<i>n</i> = 7). Electric saws (<i>n</i> = 5) and industrial machines (<i>n</i> = 5) accounted for 50% of injuries. Twelve amputations were Allen IV. Five patients were lost to follow-up and outcomes data was available for 15 patients. There was loss of flap and nail bed in three patients. There was no growth of nail in three patients. The distal phalanx graft was lost in six patients and united in the remaining nine patients. <b>Conclusions:</b> The GRF technique is a simple and reliable option in patients in whom replantation is not possible. It restores length, provides sensation and nail growth in the reconstructed fingers. <b>Level of Evidence:</b> Level IV (Therapeutic).</p>","PeriodicalId":51689,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Hand Surgery-Asian-Pacific Volume","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Hand Surgery-Asian-Pacific Volume","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1142/S2424835523500704","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/12/5 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Replantation of digital tip amputations, especially Allen III and IV, is challenging for hand surgeons as it requires a high level of microsurgical expertise and fine instruments. The graft repositioning over flap (GRF) technique is a simple and reliable procedure that provides length, sensation and nail growth and GRF has become popular in the last few years. The aim of this study is to report the short-term outcomes of the GRF technique. Methods: This is a prospective study of all patients who underwent a GRF reconstruction for Allen III and IV digital amputations at our hospital over a 12-month period. In addition to demographic data and injury details, we collected outcomes data with regard to flap and nailbed graft survival, capillary refill time, nail growth, sensation (2-point discrimination), bone union and gain in length of digit compared to length at injury. Results: Twenty patients underwent GRF reconstruction of digital amputation. They included 18 men and 2 women with an average age of 29 years. The thumb was the most frequently injured digit (n = 7). Electric saws (n = 5) and industrial machines (n = 5) accounted for 50% of injuries. Twelve amputations were Allen IV. Five patients were lost to follow-up and outcomes data was available for 15 patients. There was loss of flap and nail bed in three patients. There was no growth of nail in three patients. The distal phalanx graft was lost in six patients and united in the remaining nine patients. Conclusions: The GRF technique is a simple and reliable option in patients in whom replantation is not possible. It restores length, provides sensation and nail growth in the reconstructed fingers. Level of Evidence: Level IV (Therapeutic).

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
用于指尖截肢重建的移植物复位皮瓣技术前瞻性研究
背景:对手外科医生来说,数字尖端截肢(尤其是艾伦 III 和 IV 型截肢)的再植具有挑战性,因为它需要高水平的显微外科专业知识和精细器械。移植物皮瓣复位(GRF)技术是一种简单可靠的手术,可提供长度、感觉和指甲生长。本研究旨在报告 GRF 技术的短期效果。方法:这是一项前瞻性研究,研究对象是12个月内在我院接受GRF重建术的所有Allen III和IV级数字截肢患者。除了人口统计学数据和受伤详情外,我们还收集了皮瓣和甲床移植物存活率、毛细血管再充盈时间、指甲生长、感觉(2点辨别)、骨结合以及与受伤时长度相比的手指长度增加等方面的结果数据。结果20名患者接受了GRF重建数字截肢手术。其中包括 18 名男性和 2 名女性,平均年龄为 29 岁。拇指是最常受伤的手指(7 例)。电锯(5 例)和工业机器(5 例)占受伤总数的 50%。12例截肢为艾伦四世截肢。五名患者失去了随访机会,15名患者获得了结果数据。有三名患者的皮瓣和甲床脱落。三名患者的指甲没有生长。六名患者的远端趾骨移植物丢失,其余九名患者的远端趾骨移植物愈合。结论:对于无法进行再植的患者,GRF 技术是一种简单可靠的选择。它能恢复重建手指的长度、提供感觉和指甲生长。证据等级:四级(治疗)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
304
期刊最新文献
A 7-Year Retrospective Review of Flexor Sheath Infections. An Updated Survey of Trends in the Surgical Management of Thumb Carpometacarpal Arthritis - The Increasing Popularity of the Suture Suspension Arthroplasty. Hand Surgical Operating Room Size Allocation: A Comparative Space Utilisation Study. The Use of Cone-Beam Computed Tomography (CBCT) Arthrography for Wrist Ligamentous Injuries - A Diagnostic Test Accuracy Meta-analysis. Ultrasonographic Evaluation of Flexor Pollicis Longus Tendon Location in Various Functional Hand Positions.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1