Pub Date : 2025-12-01DOI: 10.1142/S2424835525500705
Ruqayyah Nur Beg, Olivia Ann Dunseath, Kannan Rajesparan, Melissa Mahoney, Alistair Hunter
Background: Patients with wrist injuries presenting to the emergency department (ED) are commonly managed as suspected scaphoid fractures. Resources for timely standard wrist magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scans can be insufficient. This study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of limited sequence wrist MRI scans in diagnosing suspected scaphoid fractures in patients with negative initial radiographs. Methods: A prospective, single-centre study comprising 279 consecutive wrists with suspected scaphoid fractures with initially negative radiographic findings. Patients were reviewed in fracture clinic 10-14 days post injury. If anatomical snuffbox, scaphoid tubercle tenderness or pain on axial loading of the thumb were present, a limited sequence wrist MRI scan was requested. Results: Median time from injury to ED presentation was 1 day, injury to MRI scan was 15 days and a follow-up appointment with scan result was 21 days. The MRI scans showed 47 (17%) scaphoid fractures, 66 (24%) fractures of another bone and 150 (54%) soft tissue injuries. A total of 73 (26%) scans reported no abnormalities. The sensitivity for tenderness at the anatomical snuff box was 91%, at the scaphoid tubercle was 81% and pain on the thumb axial grind test was 49%. Following their MRI scan, 41% of patients were discharged from the clinic. Six (2%) patients had operations, with four percutaneous scaphoid fixations, one EPL tendon reconstruction and one scapholunate ligament repair. Conclusions: Early limited sequence wrist MRI scans facilitate timely and effective management of suspected scaphoid fractures, thus reducing patient morbidity from missed fractures or unnecessary prolonged immobilisation. Level of Evidence: Level II (Diagnostic).
{"title":"Suspected Scaphoid Fractures Investigated with Limited Sequence Wrist MRI Scans: A Prospective Cohort Study.","authors":"Ruqayyah Nur Beg, Olivia Ann Dunseath, Kannan Rajesparan, Melissa Mahoney, Alistair Hunter","doi":"10.1142/S2424835525500705","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1142/S2424835525500705","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background:</b> Patients with wrist injuries presenting to the emergency department (ED) are commonly managed as suspected scaphoid fractures. Resources for timely standard wrist magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scans can be insufficient. This study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of limited sequence wrist MRI scans in diagnosing suspected scaphoid fractures in patients with negative initial radiographs. <b>Methods:</b> A prospective, single-centre study comprising 279 consecutive wrists with suspected scaphoid fractures with initially negative radiographic findings. Patients were reviewed in fracture clinic 10-14 days post injury. If anatomical snuffbox, scaphoid tubercle tenderness or pain on axial loading of the thumb were present, a limited sequence wrist MRI scan was requested. <b>Results:</b> Median time from injury to ED presentation was 1 day, injury to MRI scan was 15 days and a follow-up appointment with scan result was 21 days. The MRI scans showed 47 (17%) scaphoid fractures, 66 (24%) fractures of another bone and 150 (54%) soft tissue injuries. A total of 73 (26%) scans reported no abnormalities. The sensitivity for tenderness at the anatomical snuff box was 91%, at the scaphoid tubercle was 81% and pain on the thumb axial grind test was 49%. Following their MRI scan, 41% of patients were discharged from the clinic. Six (2%) patients had operations, with four percutaneous scaphoid fixations, one EPL tendon reconstruction and one scapholunate ligament repair. <b>Conclusions:</b> Early limited sequence wrist MRI scans facilitate timely and effective management of suspected scaphoid fractures, thus reducing patient morbidity from missed fractures or unnecessary prolonged immobilisation. <b>Level of Evidence:</b> Level II (Diagnostic).</p>","PeriodicalId":51689,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Hand Surgery-Asian-Pacific Volume","volume":"30 6","pages":"608-616"},"PeriodicalIF":0.5,"publicationDate":"2025-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145642638","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-12-01Epub Date: 2025-09-25DOI: 10.1142/S2424835525500663
Joash A Kumar, Samuel Bennett, Luke McCARRON, Brahman S Sivakumar, Neil Jones, David J Graham
Background: The Krukenberg procedure involves surgically separating the radius and ulnar to create a pincer-like grasp, providing an alternative for upper limb amputees in resource-limited settings where advanced myoelectric prosthetics are inaccessible. It restores prehension and potentially offers patients' autonomy in daily tasks. This review explores the patient demographics; indications; surgical techniques and outcomes of published reports of the Krukenberg procedure. Methods: A scoping review was conducted following PRISMA guidelines across PubMed, MEDLINE, Cochrane, Web of Science, EMBASE, Scopus, Ovid and Google Scholar. Studies that were peer-reviewed and published outcomes following a Krukenberg procedure were eligible for inclusion. Data on demographics, surgical methods and postoperative results were extracted. Results: Twenty-two studies (1937-2024) were included. Trauma was the primary indication (83.4%), followed by burns (10.4%) and congenital anomalies (5.5%). The Bunnell incision was most frequently employed, with nerve and muscle preservation critical for function. Interosseous membrane dissection and selective muscle resection, preserving vascular integrity, minimised bulk while maintaining function. Most patients regained independence, with a mean pincer strength of 7 kg. Complications were minimal, and were primarily skin necrosis, scarring and rare osseous sequelae, i.e. osteomyelitis, malalignment or bony overgrowth, managed via stump shortening or osteotomy. Conclusions: The Krukenberg procedure improves functional independence and socio-economic reintegration, especially in bilateral amputees. It remains a viable option in resource-limited settings where advanced prosthetics are unavailable. However, the evidence is limited by study heterogeneity. Success depends on vascular and neural preservation and early rehabilitation. Level of Evidence: Level III (Therapeutic).
背景:Krukenberg手术包括通过手术分离桡骨和尺骨以形成钳状抓握,为资源有限且无法使用先进肌电假肢的上肢截肢者提供另一种选择。它可以恢复理解能力,并可能为患者提供日常任务的自主权。这篇综述探讨了患者的人口统计学特征;迹象;Krukenberg手术的手术技术和已发表的报告的结果。方法:根据PRISMA指南对PubMed、MEDLINE、Cochrane、Web of Science、EMBASE、Scopus、Ovid和谷歌Scholar进行范围综述。经过同行评议并按照Krukenberg程序发表结果的研究符合纳入条件。提取人口统计学、手术方法和术后结果数据。结果:纳入22项研究(1937-2024)。创伤是主要适应症(83.4%),其次是烧伤(10.4%)和先天性异常(5.5%)。Bunnell切口最常用,神经和肌肉的保存对功能至关重要。骨间膜剥离和选择性肌肉切除,保留血管完整性,在保持功能的同时最小化体积。大多数患者恢复了独立,平均钳力为7kg。并发症极少,主要是皮肤坏死、瘢痕和罕见的骨性后遗症,如骨髓炎、排列失调或骨过度生长,通过残端缩短或截骨治疗。结论:Krukenberg手术改善了功能独立性和社会经济重返社会,特别是对双侧截肢者。在资源有限的环境中,先进的假肢是不可用的,它仍然是一个可行的选择。然而,证据受到研究异质性的限制。成功与否取决于血管和神经的保存和早期康复。证据等级:III级(治疗性)。
{"title":"The Krukenberg Procedure: A Scoping Review.","authors":"Joash A Kumar, Samuel Bennett, Luke McCARRON, Brahman S Sivakumar, Neil Jones, David J Graham","doi":"10.1142/S2424835525500663","DOIUrl":"10.1142/S2424835525500663","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background:</b> The Krukenberg procedure involves surgically separating the radius and ulnar to create a pincer-like grasp, providing an alternative for upper limb amputees in resource-limited settings where advanced myoelectric prosthetics are inaccessible. It restores prehension and potentially offers patients' autonomy in daily tasks. This review explores the patient demographics; indications; surgical techniques and outcomes of published reports of the Krukenberg procedure. <b>Methods:</b> A scoping review was conducted following PRISMA guidelines across PubMed, MEDLINE, Cochrane, Web of Science, EMBASE, Scopus, Ovid and Google Scholar. Studies that were peer-reviewed and published outcomes following a Krukenberg procedure were eligible for inclusion. Data on demographics, surgical methods and postoperative results were extracted. <b>Results:</b> Twenty-two studies (1937-2024) were included. Trauma was the primary indication (83.4%), followed by burns (10.4%) and congenital anomalies (5.5%). The Bunnell incision was most frequently employed, with nerve and muscle preservation critical for function. Interosseous membrane dissection and selective muscle resection, preserving vascular integrity, minimised bulk while maintaining function. Most patients regained independence, with a mean pincer strength of 7 kg. Complications were minimal, and were primarily skin necrosis, scarring and rare osseous sequelae, i.e. osteomyelitis, malalignment or bony overgrowth, managed via stump shortening or osteotomy. <b>Conclusions:</b> The Krukenberg procedure improves functional independence and socio-economic reintegration, especially in bilateral amputees. It remains a viable option in resource-limited settings where advanced prosthetics are unavailable. However, the evidence is limited by study heterogeneity. Success depends on vascular and neural preservation and early rehabilitation. <b>Level of Evidence:</b> Level III (Therapeutic).</p>","PeriodicalId":51689,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Hand Surgery-Asian-Pacific Volume","volume":" ","pages":"662-673"},"PeriodicalIF":0.5,"publicationDate":"2025-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145132488","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-12-01Epub Date: 2025-09-25DOI: 10.1142/S2424835525500651
Hyoung Bok Kim, Joong-Won Ha, Hyun Tak Kang, Munsu Park, Jun-Ku Lee
Background: Carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS) is a common neuropathy of the upper limb, with carpal tunnel release (CTR) being a widely performed surgical intervention when conservative treatments fail. However, up to 20% of patients experience persistent or recurrent symptoms, and up to 12% may require revision surgery. This study aims to evaluate the outcomes of revision CTR with external neurolysis compared to primary CTR using propensity score matching (PSM). Methods: This retrospective single-centre cohort study included patients who underwent primary and revision CTR between March 2021 and February 2024. A total of 38 patients were analysed, with 19 patients undergoing revision CTR (Group 1) and 19 patients undergoing primary CTR (Group 2). PSM (1:1 nearest-neighbour, calliper 0.2) was used to ensure comparability between the groups based on age, weight, height, body mass index (BMI), comorbidities and the operated arm. Clinical outcomes were assessed using the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) for pain and the Boston Carpal Tunnel Questionnaire (BCTQ) for symptom severity and functional status. Results: Patients in Group 1 initially presented with significantly higher VAS scores compared to Group 2 (8.1 vs. 6.5, p = 0.001). At an average follow-up of 13.9 months, the BCTQ scores for symptom severity scale (SSS) and functional status scale (FSS) in Group 1 were comparable to those in Group 2 (SSS: 16.0 vs. 17.4, p = 0.393; FSS: 12.2 vs. 14.9, p = 0.101). No significant differences in CTS severity grades on electrodiagnostic studies were observed between the groups preoperatively. One patient in Group 1 experienced symptom recurrence 18 months postoperatively, but no other complications were reported. Conclusions: Revision CTR with external neurolysis can effectively manage persistent or recurrent CTS, though patients may require a longer recovery period to achieve outcomes similar to those undergoing primary CTR. Level of Evidence: Level IV (Therapeutic).
{"title":"Comparative Outcomes of Revision Carpal Tunnel Release with External Neurolysis versus Primary Carpal Tunnel Release: A Propensity-Matched Study.","authors":"Hyoung Bok Kim, Joong-Won Ha, Hyun Tak Kang, Munsu Park, Jun-Ku Lee","doi":"10.1142/S2424835525500651","DOIUrl":"10.1142/S2424835525500651","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background:</b> Carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS) is a common neuropathy of the upper limb, with carpal tunnel release (CTR) being a widely performed surgical intervention when conservative treatments fail. However, up to 20% of patients experience persistent or recurrent symptoms, and up to 12% may require revision surgery. This study aims to evaluate the outcomes of revision CTR with external neurolysis compared to primary CTR using propensity score matching (PSM). <b>Methods:</b> This retrospective single-centre cohort study included patients who underwent primary and revision CTR between March 2021 and February 2024. A total of 38 patients were analysed, with 19 patients undergoing revision CTR (Group 1) and 19 patients undergoing primary CTR (Group 2). PSM (1:1 nearest-neighbour, calliper 0.2) was used to ensure comparability between the groups based on age, weight, height, body mass index (BMI), comorbidities and the operated arm. Clinical outcomes were assessed using the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) for pain and the Boston Carpal Tunnel Questionnaire (BCTQ) for symptom severity and functional status. <b>Results:</b> Patients in Group 1 initially presented with significantly higher VAS scores compared to Group 2 (8.1 vs. 6.5, <i>p</i> = 0.001). At an average follow-up of 13.9 months, the BCTQ scores for symptom severity scale (SSS) and functional status scale (FSS) in Group 1 were comparable to those in Group 2 (SSS: 16.0 vs. 17.4, <i>p</i> = 0.393; FSS: 12.2 vs. 14.9, <i>p</i> = 0.101). No significant differences in CTS severity grades on electrodiagnostic studies were observed between the groups preoperatively. One patient in Group 1 experienced symptom recurrence 18 months postoperatively, but no other complications were reported. <b>Conclusions:</b> Revision CTR with external neurolysis can effectively manage persistent or recurrent CTS, though patients may require a longer recovery period to achieve outcomes similar to those undergoing primary CTR. <b>Level of Evidence:</b> Level IV (Therapeutic).</p>","PeriodicalId":51689,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Hand Surgery-Asian-Pacific Volume","volume":" ","pages":"641-648"},"PeriodicalIF":0.5,"publicationDate":"2025-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145132507","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-12-01Epub Date: 2025-09-25DOI: 10.1142/S2424835525720117
Keiichi Muramatsu, Mon Gabriel Distor, Genuino Karissa Flores, Yo Morita
Until now, we were able to find 38 reports of Vater-Pacini corpuscles (VPC) neuromas of the digital nerve. We reported our first case in 2023. In this article, we present our subsequent three cases of VPC neuromas and discuss their clinical presentations and anatomical origin. Interestingly, the hyperplastic VPC neuromas were found within the epineurium of the digital nerve in two cases. Anatomically, the VPCs extend, like a kite on a string, from the digital nerve and should not exist within the peripheral nerve. The regeneration and remodelling of VPCs over time have been entirely unknown. There may be stem tissue, like seeds of VPCs, in the peripheral nerves. When they receive some stimulation, they may form new VPCs. Moreover, with hyperstimulation, they may excessively form and become a VPC neuroma. Level of Evidence: Level V (Therapeutic).
{"title":"Digital Vater-Pacini Corpuscles Neuroma: Where Does it Come from?","authors":"Keiichi Muramatsu, Mon Gabriel Distor, Genuino Karissa Flores, Yo Morita","doi":"10.1142/S2424835525720117","DOIUrl":"10.1142/S2424835525720117","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Until now, we were able to find 38 reports of Vater-Pacini corpuscles (VPC) neuromas of the digital nerve. We reported our first case in 2023. In this article, we present our subsequent three cases of VPC neuromas and discuss their clinical presentations and anatomical origin. Interestingly, the hyperplastic VPC neuromas were found within the epineurium of the digital nerve in two cases. Anatomically, the VPCs extend, like a kite on a string, from the digital nerve and should not exist within the peripheral nerve. The regeneration and remodelling of VPCs over time have been entirely unknown. There may be stem tissue, like seeds of VPCs, in the peripheral nerves. When they receive some stimulation, they may form new VPCs. Moreover, with hyperstimulation, they may excessively form and become a VPC neuroma. <b>Level of Evidence:</b> Level V (Therapeutic).</p>","PeriodicalId":51689,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Hand Surgery-Asian-Pacific Volume","volume":" ","pages":"680-683"},"PeriodicalIF":0.5,"publicationDate":"2025-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145132483","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-12-01Epub Date: 2025-09-25DOI: 10.1142/S242483552550064X
Matthew W T Curran, Michael Foster, Wolfgang Heiss-Dunlop, Shirley Collocott, Greg Couzens, Mark Ross
Background: Diaphyseal ulna shortening osteotomy (USO) is an accepted treatment for multiple ulnar sided wrist pathologies. Recently, a number of specifically designed compression plates for USO have become available. The purpose of the study was to assess the outcomes of an ulnar osteotomy compression plate system for USO across multiple centres. Methods: A multicentre cohort study was conducted on USO performed for a variety of ulnar-sided wrist pathologies using a USO compression system. Radiographic, clinical and subjective outcomes were assessed postoperatively and compared between aetiologies. Results: A total of 174 USOs were performed with union achieved in 170 osteotomies. Overall satisfaction was high and 83.2% returned to work. And 31.6% of patients required plate removal. Conclusions: The use of a specific USO compression plate provides a reasonable option for USO with similar results across multiple sites. High union rates can be achieved. However, the incidence of plate removal was high and remains a potential concern warranting further study. Level of Evidence: Level IV (Therapeutic).
{"title":"A Multicentre Outcomes Study of the Diaphyseal Ulnar Osteotomy with a Dedicated Compression Plate.","authors":"Matthew W T Curran, Michael Foster, Wolfgang Heiss-Dunlop, Shirley Collocott, Greg Couzens, Mark Ross","doi":"10.1142/S242483552550064X","DOIUrl":"10.1142/S242483552550064X","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background:</b> Diaphyseal ulna shortening osteotomy (USO) is an accepted treatment for multiple ulnar sided wrist pathologies. Recently, a number of specifically designed compression plates for USO have become available. The purpose of the study was to assess the outcomes of an ulnar osteotomy compression plate system for USO across multiple centres. <b>Methods:</b> A multicentre cohort study was conducted on USO performed for a variety of ulnar-sided wrist pathologies using a USO compression system. Radiographic, clinical and subjective outcomes were assessed postoperatively and compared between aetiologies. <b>Results:</b> A total of 174 USOs were performed with union achieved in 170 osteotomies. Overall satisfaction was high and 83.2% returned to work. And 31.6% of patients required plate removal. <b>Conclusions:</b> The use of a specific USO compression plate provides a reasonable option for USO with similar results across multiple sites. High union rates can be achieved. However, the incidence of plate removal was high and remains a potential concern warranting further study. <b>Level of Evidence:</b> Level IV (Therapeutic).</p>","PeriodicalId":51689,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Hand Surgery-Asian-Pacific Volume","volume":" ","pages":"590-598"},"PeriodicalIF":0.5,"publicationDate":"2025-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145132498","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Surgical treatment of Kienböck disease remains controversial and depends on patient age, activity and disease stage. We report an 18-year-old female badminton player who presented with wrist pain, limited motion and decreased grip strength. Imaging revealed a displaced coronal lunate fracture, with the palmar fragment locked against the volar rim of the radius, consistent with Lichtman Stage IIIC and Bain grade 2b. MRI showed low signal intensity, suggesting compromised vascularity. Arthroscopy confirmed intact cartilage except at the fracture site. Lunate reconstruction using the Kuhlmann technique with a vascularised bone graft was performed, and the scaphoid was temporarily fixed to the radius to offload the lunate. At 2-year follow-up, despite the development of radiolunate osteoarthritis, the patient showed significant improvement in pain, grip strength and wrist motion. This case highlights that although disease progression may continue, joint-preserving reconstruction can achieve favourable functional outcomes in young, active patients. Level of Evidence: Level V (Therapeutic).
{"title":"Combined Vascularised Bone Graft Techniques for Displaced Coronal Fracture in Kienböck Disease: A Case Report.","authors":"Sineenart Honglertkawin, Sitthiphong Suwannaphisit, Kenji Kawamura, Shohei Omokawa","doi":"10.1142/S2424835525720129","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1142/S2424835525720129","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Surgical treatment of Kienböck disease remains controversial and depends on patient age, activity and disease stage. We report an 18-year-old female badminton player who presented with wrist pain, limited motion and decreased grip strength. Imaging revealed a displaced coronal lunate fracture, with the palmar fragment locked against the volar rim of the radius, consistent with Lichtman Stage IIIC and Bain grade 2b. MRI showed low signal intensity, suggesting compromised vascularity. Arthroscopy confirmed intact cartilage except at the fracture site. Lunate reconstruction using the Kuhlmann technique with a vascularised bone graft was performed, and the scaphoid was temporarily fixed to the radius to offload the lunate. At 2-year follow-up, despite the development of radiolunate osteoarthritis, the patient showed significant improvement in pain, grip strength and wrist motion. This case highlights that although disease progression may continue, joint-preserving reconstruction can achieve favourable functional outcomes in young, active patients. <b>Level of Evidence:</b> Level V (Therapeutic).</p>","PeriodicalId":51689,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Hand Surgery-Asian-Pacific Volume","volume":"30 6","pages":"674-679"},"PeriodicalIF":0.5,"publicationDate":"2025-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145642522","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-12-01Epub Date: 2025-09-25DOI: 10.1142/S2424835525500626
Thien Thai, Luke McCARRON, David J Graham, Brahman Sivakumar
Background: Scaphoid non-union is a challenging condition that can lead to chronic wrist pain, decreased range of motion (ROM) and functional impairment. One promising approach involves the use of costo-osteochondral rib autografts, offering a non-vascularised and structurally supportive environment for bone regeneration. This systematic review aims to evaluate the current evidence regarding the management of non-salvageable scaphoid proximal poles and non-union using rib costo-osteochondral autografts. Methods: A comprehensive search of electronic databases was conducted. Data extraction was performed independently by two authors. The primary outcomes were ROM, grip strength, pain, functional outcomes and complications. Results: A total of six studies were identified that met the inclusion criteria. A total of 101 patients had undergone scaphoid costo-osteochondral autografting with a rib donor. Postoperative active ROM arc had a mean of 112° (range: 78°-125°), with grip strength mean of 34 kg (range: 22-50 kg). Various functional outcome measures were reported, such as the QuickDASH, Patient Rated Wrist Evaluation (PRWE) and Visual Analogue Scale (VAS), with overall improvement noted for function and pain. Complications were reported in 10% of cases, including four donor site complications. Conclusions: The available literature supports the use of costo-osteochondral rib autografts to treat the non-salvageable proximal scaphoid, with short-term improvement in ROM and function. However, given the heterogeneity of the included studies and the limited number of high-quality randomised controlled trials, further research is needed to establish the optimal graft selection for scaphoid AVN or non-union. Level of Evidence: Level III (Therapeutic).
{"title":"Costo-Osteochondral Autograft for the Non-salvageable Proximal Scaphoid: A Systematic Review.","authors":"Thien Thai, Luke McCARRON, David J Graham, Brahman Sivakumar","doi":"10.1142/S2424835525500626","DOIUrl":"10.1142/S2424835525500626","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background:</b> Scaphoid non-union is a challenging condition that can lead to chronic wrist pain, decreased range of motion (ROM) and functional impairment. One promising approach involves the use of costo-osteochondral rib autografts, offering a non-vascularised and structurally supportive environment for bone regeneration. This systematic review aims to evaluate the current evidence regarding the management of non-salvageable scaphoid proximal poles and non-union using rib costo-osteochondral autografts. <b>Methods:</b> A comprehensive search of electronic databases was conducted. Data extraction was performed independently by two authors. The primary outcomes were ROM, grip strength, pain, functional outcomes and complications. <b>Results:</b> A total of six studies were identified that met the inclusion criteria. A total of 101 patients had undergone scaphoid costo-osteochondral autografting with a rib donor. Postoperative active ROM arc had a mean of 112° (range: 78°-125°), with grip strength mean of 34 kg (range: 22-50 kg). Various functional outcome measures were reported, such as the QuickDASH, Patient Rated Wrist Evaluation (PRWE) and Visual Analogue Scale (VAS), with overall improvement noted for function and pain. Complications were reported in 10% of cases, including four donor site complications. <b>Conclusions:</b> The available literature supports the use of costo-osteochondral rib autografts to treat the non-salvageable proximal scaphoid, with short-term improvement in ROM and function. However, given the heterogeneity of the included studies and the limited number of high-quality randomised controlled trials, further research is needed to establish the optimal graft selection for scaphoid AVN or non-union. <b>Level of Evidence:</b> Level III (Therapeutic).</p>","PeriodicalId":51689,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Hand Surgery-Asian-Pacific Volume","volume":" ","pages":"599-607"},"PeriodicalIF":0.5,"publicationDate":"2025-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145132513","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-12-01Epub Date: 2025-09-25DOI: 10.1142/S2424835525500638
Ramin Shekouhi, Mary Margaret Holohan, Syeda Hoorulain Ahmed, Paola N Piascik, Lindsey Morrow, Harvey Chim
Background: Brachial plexus (BP) injuries are a known complication of shoulder dislocation, yet optimal management strategies remain unclear. This systematic review aims to evaluate the outcomes and treatment approaches for BP injuries following shoulder dislocation. Methods: A systematic review was conducted according to PRISMA guidelines across four databases: PubMed/MEDLINE, Embase, Scopus and Web of Science. Eligible studies included human subjects with BP injuries following shoulder dislocation. Data extraction and risk of bias (ROB) assessment were independently performed by two reviewers. Due to heterogeneity amongst the studies, a meta-analysis was not conducted. Results: Out of 2,060 initial studies, 9 met the inclusion criteria, encompassing a total of 255 patients (256 limbs) with a mean age of 55.9 ± 16.0 years. Of these, 193 (75.7%) had BP injuries post dislocation. Conservative management was the most common treatment (149 cases, 67.4%), followed by neurolysis ± nerve transfer (44 cases, 19.9%) and nerve repair (28 cases, 12.7%). Amongst 133 patients with reported BP injury patterns, the posterior cord was most frequently involved (38.3%). Sensory and motor recovery was observed in 51.6% and 45.2% of patients respectively, with 60.4% of patients achieving MRC grade ≥ 4 in studies that reported this metric. The mean follow-up period was 28.4 months. Conclusions: BP injuries following shoulder dislocation are uncommon but clinically significant. Conservative treatment remains the predominant approach, though surgical interventions may offer improved functional recovery in selected cases. Level of Evidence: Level III (Therapeutic).
背景:臂丛(BP)损伤是众所周知的肩部脱位并发症,但最佳处理策略尚不清楚。本系统综述旨在评估肩关节脱位后BP损伤的预后和治疗方法。方法:根据PRISMA指南对PubMed/MEDLINE、Embase、Scopus和Web of Science四个数据库进行系统评价。符合条件的研究包括肩关节脱位后BP损伤的人类受试者。数据提取和偏倚风险(ROB)评估由两位评论者独立完成。由于研究间存在异质性,未进行meta分析。结果:在2060项初始研究中,9项符合纳入标准,共包括255例患者(256条肢体),平均年龄55.9±16.0岁。其中193例(75.7%)脱位后有BP损伤。保守治疗最多(149例,67.4%),其次为神经松解术+神经移植(44例,19.9%)和神经修复(28例,12.7%)。在133例报告的BP损伤类型中,后脊髓最常受累(38.3%)。51.6%和45.2%的患者分别观察到感觉和运动恢复,60.4%的患者在报告该指标的研究中达到MRC等级≥4。平均随访时间28.4个月。结论:肩关节脱位后的BP损伤并不常见,但具有重要的临床意义。保守治疗仍然是主要的治疗方法,尽管手术干预可以改善某些病例的功能恢复。证据等级:III级(治疗性)。
{"title":"Management and Outcomes of Brachial Plexus Injuries after Shoulder Dislocation: A Systematic Review.","authors":"Ramin Shekouhi, Mary Margaret Holohan, Syeda Hoorulain Ahmed, Paola N Piascik, Lindsey Morrow, Harvey Chim","doi":"10.1142/S2424835525500638","DOIUrl":"10.1142/S2424835525500638","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background:</b> Brachial plexus (BP) injuries are a known complication of shoulder dislocation, yet optimal management strategies remain unclear. This systematic review aims to evaluate the outcomes and treatment approaches for BP injuries following shoulder dislocation. <b>Methods:</b> A systematic review was conducted according to PRISMA guidelines across four databases: PubMed/MEDLINE, Embase, Scopus and Web of Science. Eligible studies included human subjects with BP injuries following shoulder dislocation. Data extraction and risk of bias (ROB) assessment were independently performed by two reviewers. Due to heterogeneity amongst the studies, a meta-analysis was not conducted. <b>Results:</b> Out of 2,060 initial studies, 9 met the inclusion criteria, encompassing a total of 255 patients (256 limbs) with a mean age of 55.9 ± 16.0 years. Of these, 193 (75.7%) had BP injuries post dislocation. Conservative management was the most common treatment (149 cases, 67.4%), followed by neurolysis ± nerve transfer (44 cases, 19.9%) and nerve repair (28 cases, 12.7%). Amongst 133 patients with reported BP injury patterns, the posterior cord was most frequently involved (38.3%). Sensory and motor recovery was observed in 51.6% and 45.2% of patients respectively, with 60.4% of patients achieving MRC grade ≥ 4 in studies that reported this metric. The mean follow-up period was 28.4 months. <b>Conclusions:</b> BP injuries following shoulder dislocation are uncommon but clinically significant. Conservative treatment remains the predominant approach, though surgical interventions may offer improved functional recovery in selected cases. <b>Level of Evidence:</b> Level III (Therapeutic).</p>","PeriodicalId":51689,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Hand Surgery-Asian-Pacific Volume","volume":" ","pages":"633-640"},"PeriodicalIF":0.5,"publicationDate":"2025-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145132486","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-12-01DOI: 10.1142/S2424835525500602
Darshan Kumar A Jain, Harshit Bhaskar Shetty, Rohith Gopalakrishna Bhat
Background: Patients with dorsal fracture dislocations of the proximal interphalangeal joint (PIPJ) may have significant functional impairment. This study aims to present the outcomes of open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) in patients who presented late with dorsal fracture dislocations of the PIPJ and to evaluate factors affecting the outcomes. Methods: This retrospective study included patients who presented late with a dorsal PIPJ fracture dislocation and underwent ORIF. The outcome measures included active arc of motion (AAOM) of the PIPJ and distal interphalangeal joint (DIPJ), grip strength, Quick disabilities of the arm, shoulder and hand (Q-DASH), Ishida and Ikuta scores. The outcomes data was statistically analysed to determine association of outcomes with the finger involved, mechanism of injury, presence of concomitant injury, delay between injury and surgery, percentage of the articular surface involved, presence of comminution of the volar lip and involvement of proximal phalanx head. Results: The mean surgical delay was 58 days. The average articular surface involvement was 58%. The PIPJ AAOM improved by 72°, with a 10° mean flexion deformity, an average Q-DASH score of 4.8 and grip strength at 84% of the non-operated hand. Eleven patients achieved excellent Ishida and Ikuta scores, two good and four fair-to-poor. Surgical delay had no significant impact (p > 0.05), but less-comminuted fractures and non-cricket injuries showed better recovery (p < 0.05). Concomitant injuries and proximal phalanx head involvement correlated with higher disability scores, lower grip strength and poorer functional outcomes (p < 0.05). Conclusions: ORIF is a viable, joint-preserving surgical option that can be considered in delayed cases up to 2 months. This technique retains the native osteochondral fragments. The surgical approach allows one to convert to hemi-hamate arthroplasty (HHA) as an alternative procedure in the same setting when fracture is not amenable for reconstruction. Level of Evidence: Level IV (Therapeutic).
{"title":"Outcomes of Open Reduction and Internal Fixation for Dorsal Fracture Dislocations of the Proximal Interphalangeal Joint Presenting Late.","authors":"Darshan Kumar A Jain, Harshit Bhaskar Shetty, Rohith Gopalakrishna Bhat","doi":"10.1142/S2424835525500602","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1142/S2424835525500602","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background:</b> Patients with dorsal fracture dislocations of the proximal interphalangeal joint (PIPJ) may have significant functional impairment. This study aims to present the outcomes of open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) in patients who presented late with dorsal fracture dislocations of the PIPJ and to evaluate factors affecting the outcomes. <b>Methods:</b> This retrospective study included patients who presented late with a dorsal PIPJ fracture dislocation and underwent ORIF. The outcome measures included active arc of motion (AAOM) of the PIPJ and distal interphalangeal joint (DIPJ), grip strength, Quick disabilities of the arm, shoulder and hand (Q-DASH), Ishida and Ikuta scores. The outcomes data was statistically analysed to determine association of outcomes with the finger involved, mechanism of injury, presence of concomitant injury, delay between injury and surgery, percentage of the articular surface involved, presence of comminution of the volar lip and involvement of proximal phalanx head. <b>Results:</b> The mean surgical delay was 58 days. The average articular surface involvement was 58%. The PIPJ AAOM improved by 72°, with a 10° mean flexion deformity, an average Q-DASH score of 4.8 and grip strength at 84% of the non-operated hand. Eleven patients achieved excellent Ishida and Ikuta scores, two good and four fair-to-poor. Surgical delay had no significant impact (<i>p</i> > 0.05), but less-comminuted fractures and non-cricket injuries showed better recovery (<i>p</i> < 0.05). Concomitant injuries and proximal phalanx head involvement correlated with higher disability scores, lower grip strength and poorer functional outcomes (<i>p</i> < 0.05). <b>Conclusions:</b> ORIF is a viable, joint-preserving surgical option that can be considered in delayed cases up to 2 months. This technique retains the native osteochondral fragments. The surgical approach allows one to convert to hemi-hamate arthroplasty (HHA) as an alternative procedure in the same setting when fracture is not amenable for reconstruction. <b>Level of Evidence:</b> Level IV (Therapeutic).</p>","PeriodicalId":51689,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Hand Surgery-Asian-Pacific Volume","volume":"30 6","pages":"617-625"},"PeriodicalIF":0.5,"publicationDate":"2025-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145642645","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Background: Contralateral C7 (CC7) is an important donor nerve for reconstruction in global brachial plexus palsy. In 2013, Shu Feng Wang introduced the direct repair of lower trunk (LT) to CC7. The outcomes of hand recovery reported in the study was significantly better than the traditional techniques. We did a retrospective analysis of 11 consecutive adult patients who underwent reconstruction for pan-brachial plexus injury by repair of the CC7 to LT along with other extraplexal nerve transfers. Methods: Patients were evaluated for motor recovery of flexion and extension at elbow, wrist and digits (Modified medical research council [MRC] grading). They were also evaluated for cortical plasticity and complications, if any. Results: Eleven consecutive patients underwent CC7 to LT transfer during the study duration. The mean follow-up period was 85 ±11.39 months (range: 69-105 months). Two out of the eight patients with a CC7 transfer to MCN regained M4 elbow flexion, while one regained M3 function. The remaining five did not recover elbow flexion. Two patients who had an ICN to MCN transfer regained M4 elbow flexion. Four out of 11 patients regained >M3+ wrist and finger flexion. Out of the four patients with a CC7 to LT, none recovered any elbow extension. Out of the seven patients who underwent a phrenic to PDLT transfer, six regained M3+ elbow extension. Out of the seven patients with phrenic to PDLT transfer, none regained any wrist or finger extension. Conclusions: Outcome in terms of composite motor recovery of hand is better that other reconstructive techniques but falls short of qualifying as a functionally useful hand. Elbow flexion recovery is inferior when compared to other extraplexal nerve transfers. Neuropathic pain is reduced. There is restoration of protective sensation in both ulnar and median nerve territory. Level of Evidence: Level IV (Therapeutic).
{"title":"Long Term Analysis of 11 Consecutive Contralateral C7 to Lower Trunk Transfer via a Pre-spinal Approach in Adult Pan Brachial Plexus Injury Patients.","authors":"Vimalendu Brajesh, Aditya Aggarwal, Rakesh Kumar Khazanchi","doi":"10.1142/S2424835525500614","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1142/S2424835525500614","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background:</b> Contralateral C7 (CC7) is an important donor nerve for reconstruction in global brachial plexus palsy. In 2013, Shu Feng Wang introduced the direct repair of lower trunk (LT) to CC7. The outcomes of hand recovery reported in the study was significantly better than the traditional techniques. We did a retrospective analysis of 11 consecutive adult patients who underwent reconstruction for pan-brachial plexus injury by repair of the CC7 to LT along with other extraplexal nerve transfers. <b>Methods:</b> Patients were evaluated for motor recovery of flexion and extension at elbow, wrist and digits (Modified medical research council [MRC] grading). They were also evaluated for cortical plasticity and complications, if any. <b>Results:</b> Eleven consecutive patients underwent CC7 to LT transfer during the study duration. The mean follow-up period was 85 ±11.39 months (range: 69-105 months). Two out of the eight patients with a CC7 transfer to MCN regained M4 elbow flexion, while one regained M3 function. The remaining five did not recover elbow flexion. Two patients who had an ICN to MCN transfer regained M4 elbow flexion. Four out of 11 patients regained >M3+ wrist and finger flexion. Out of the four patients with a CC7 to LT, none recovered any elbow extension. Out of the seven patients who underwent a phrenic to PDLT transfer, six regained M3+ elbow extension. Out of the seven patients with phrenic to PDLT transfer, none regained any wrist or finger extension. <b>Conclusions:</b> Outcome in terms of composite motor recovery of hand is better that other reconstructive techniques but falls short of qualifying as a functionally useful hand. Elbow flexion recovery is inferior when compared to other extraplexal nerve transfers. Neuropathic pain is reduced. There is restoration of protective sensation in both ulnar and median nerve territory. <b>Level of Evidence:</b> Level IV (Therapeutic).</p>","PeriodicalId":51689,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Hand Surgery-Asian-Pacific Volume","volume":"30 6","pages":"626-632"},"PeriodicalIF":0.5,"publicationDate":"2025-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145642668","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}