Harpa Stefánsdóttir, Kathryn Crowe, Egill Magnússon, Mark Guiberson, Thora Másdóttir, Inga Ágústsdóttir, Ösp V Baldursdóttir
{"title":"Measuring speech intelligibility with deaf and hard-of-hearing children: A systematic review.","authors":"Harpa Stefánsdóttir, Kathryn Crowe, Egill Magnússon, Mark Guiberson, Thora Másdóttir, Inga Ágústsdóttir, Ösp V Baldursdóttir","doi":"10.1093/deafed/enad054","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>There is great variability in the ways in which the speech intelligibility of d/Deaf and hard-of-hearing (DHH) children who use spoken language as part, or all, of their communication system is measured. This systematic review examined the measures and methods that have been used when examining the speech intelligibility of children who are DHH and the characteristics of these measures and methods. A systematic database search was conducted of CENTRAL; CINAHL; Cochrane; ERIC; Joanna Briggs; Linguistics, Language and Behavior Abstracts; Medline; Scopus; and Web of Science databases, as well as supplemental searches. A total of 204 included studies reported the use of many different measures/methods which measured segmental aspects of speech, with the most common being Allen et al.'s (2001, The reliability of a rating scale for measuring speech intelligibility following pediatric cochlear implantation. Otology and Neurotology, 22(5), 631-633. https://doi.org/10.1097/00129492-200109000-00012) Speech Intelligibility Rating scale. Many studies included insufficient details to determine the measure that was used. Future research should utilize methods/measures with known psychometric validity, provide clear descriptions of the methods/measures used, and consider using more than one measure to account for limitations inherent in different methods of measuring the speech intelligibility of children who are DHH, and consider and discuss the rationale for the measure/method chosen.</p>","PeriodicalId":47768,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Deaf Studies and Deaf Education","volume":" ","pages":"265-277"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10950422/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Deaf Studies and Deaf Education","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/deafed/enad054","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EDUCATION, SPECIAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
There is great variability in the ways in which the speech intelligibility of d/Deaf and hard-of-hearing (DHH) children who use spoken language as part, or all, of their communication system is measured. This systematic review examined the measures and methods that have been used when examining the speech intelligibility of children who are DHH and the characteristics of these measures and methods. A systematic database search was conducted of CENTRAL; CINAHL; Cochrane; ERIC; Joanna Briggs; Linguistics, Language and Behavior Abstracts; Medline; Scopus; and Web of Science databases, as well as supplemental searches. A total of 204 included studies reported the use of many different measures/methods which measured segmental aspects of speech, with the most common being Allen et al.'s (2001, The reliability of a rating scale for measuring speech intelligibility following pediatric cochlear implantation. Otology and Neurotology, 22(5), 631-633. https://doi.org/10.1097/00129492-200109000-00012) Speech Intelligibility Rating scale. Many studies included insufficient details to determine the measure that was used. Future research should utilize methods/measures with known psychometric validity, provide clear descriptions of the methods/measures used, and consider using more than one measure to account for limitations inherent in different methods of measuring the speech intelligibility of children who are DHH, and consider and discuss the rationale for the measure/method chosen.
聋儿和重听儿童(DHH)使用口语作为其交流系统的一部分或全部,他们的言语理解能力在测量方法上存在很大差异。本系统性综述研究了在研究聋哑儿童言语理解能力时所使用的测量方法和手段,以及这些测量方法和手段的特点。我们对 CENTRAL、CINAHL、Cochrane、ERIC、Joanna Briggs、Linguistics、Language and Behavior Abstracts、Medline、Scopus 和 Web of Science 数据库进行了系统性检索,并进行了补充检索。共有 204 项纳入的研究报告使用了许多不同的测量方法来测量语音的分段方面,其中最常见的是 Allen 等人(2001 年,用于测量小儿人工耳蜗植入术后语音清晰度的评分量表的可靠性。https://doi.org/10.1097/00129492-200109000-00012)的言语清晰度评定量表。许多研究的细节不足以确定所使用的测量方法。未来的研究应使用已知心理测量有效性的方法/测量方法,对所使用的方法/测量方法进行清晰的描述,并考虑使用一种以上的测量方法,以考虑不同方法测量 DHH 儿童言语智能的固有局限性,并考虑和讨论所选测量方法/方法的理由。
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Deaf Studies and Deaf Education is a peer-reviewed scholarly journal integrating and coordinating basic and applied research relating to individuals who are deaf, including cultural, developmental, linguistic, and educational topics. JDSDE addresses issues of current and future concern to allied fields, encouraging interdisciplinary discussion. The journal promises a forum that is timely, of high quality, and accessible to researchers, educators, and lay audiences. Instructions for contributors appear at the back of each issue.