Use of digoxin in the emergency department to treat patients with acute heart failure and its impact on short-term outcomes.

Enrique Martín Mojarro, Víctor Gil, Pere Llorens, Jesús Álvarez, Silvia Flores Quesada, Osvaldo J Troiano Ungerer, Aitor Alquézar-Arbé, Javier Jacob, Pablo Herrero-Puente, Begoña Espinosa, Carolina Sánchez, Lluis Llauger, Josep Tost, Leticia Serrano, Aitor Dávila, Raquel Torres Garate, María Luisa López-Grima, Francisco Javier Lucas-Imbernón, Héctor Alonso, Fran Pagán, José Manuel Garrido, Òscar Miró
{"title":"Use of digoxin in the emergency department to treat patients with acute heart failure and its impact on short-term outcomes.","authors":"Enrique Martín Mojarro, Víctor Gil, Pere Llorens, Jesús Álvarez, Silvia Flores Quesada, Osvaldo J Troiano Ungerer, Aitor Alquézar-Arbé, Javier Jacob, Pablo Herrero-Puente, Begoña Espinosa, Carolina Sánchez, Lluis Llauger, Josep Tost, Leticia Serrano, Aitor Dávila, Raquel Torres Garate, María Luisa López-Grima, Francisco Javier Lucas-Imbernón, Héctor Alonso, Fran Pagán, José Manuel Garrido, Òscar Miró","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To analyze factors related to the use of digoxin to treat patients with acute heart failure (AHF) in emergency departments (EDs) and the impact of digoxin treatment on short-term outcomes.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>We included patients diagnosed with AHF in 45 Spanish EDs. The patients, who were not undergoing long-term treatment for heart failure, were classified according to whether or not they were given intravenous digoxin in the ED. Fifty-one patient or cardiac decompensation episode variables were recorded to profile ED patients treated with digoxin. Outcome variables studied were the need for hospital admission, prolonged stay in the ED (> 24 hours) for discharged patients, prolonged hospitalization (> 7 days) for admitted patients, and all-cause in-hospital or 30-day mortality. The associations between digoxin treatment and the outcomes were studied with odds ratios (ORs) adjusted for patient and AHF episode characteristics.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Data for 15 549 patients (median age, 83 years; 55% women) were analyzed; 1430 (9.2%) were treated with digoxin. Digoxin was used more often in women, young patients, and those with better New York Heart Association (NYHA) classifications but more severe cardiac decompensation, especially if the trigger was atrial fibrillation with rapid ventricular response. Admissions were ordered for 75.4% of the patients overall (81.6% of digoxin-treated patients vs 74.8% of nontreated patients; P .001). The ED stay was prolonged in 38.3% of patients discharged from the ED (52.9% of digoxin-treated patients vs 37.2% of nontreated patients; P .001). The duration of hospital stay was prolonged in 48.1% (digoxin-treated, 49.3% vs 47.9%; P = .385). In-hospital mortality was 7.2% overall (6.9% vs 7.2%, P= .712), and 30-day mortality was 9.7% (9.3% vs 9.7%, P = .625). ED use of digoxin was associated with a prolonged stay in the department (adjusted OR, 1.883; 95% CI, 1.359-2.608) but not with hospitalization or mortality.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Digoxin continues to be used in one out of ten ED patients who are not already on long-term treatment with the drug. Digoxin use is associated with cardiac decompensation triggered by atrial fibrillation with rapid ventricular response, younger age, women, and patients with better initial NYHA function status but possibly more severe decompensation. Digoxin use leads to a longer ED stay but is safe, as it is not associated with need for admission, prolonged hospitalization, or short-term mortality.</p>","PeriodicalId":93987,"journal":{"name":"Emergencias : revista de la Sociedad Espanola de Medicina de Emergencias","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Emergencias : revista de la Sociedad Espanola de Medicina de Emergencias","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: To analyze factors related to the use of digoxin to treat patients with acute heart failure (AHF) in emergency departments (EDs) and the impact of digoxin treatment on short-term outcomes.

Material and methods: We included patients diagnosed with AHF in 45 Spanish EDs. The patients, who were not undergoing long-term treatment for heart failure, were classified according to whether or not they were given intravenous digoxin in the ED. Fifty-one patient or cardiac decompensation episode variables were recorded to profile ED patients treated with digoxin. Outcome variables studied were the need for hospital admission, prolonged stay in the ED (> 24 hours) for discharged patients, prolonged hospitalization (> 7 days) for admitted patients, and all-cause in-hospital or 30-day mortality. The associations between digoxin treatment and the outcomes were studied with odds ratios (ORs) adjusted for patient and AHF episode characteristics.

Results: Data for 15 549 patients (median age, 83 years; 55% women) were analyzed; 1430 (9.2%) were treated with digoxin. Digoxin was used more often in women, young patients, and those with better New York Heart Association (NYHA) classifications but more severe cardiac decompensation, especially if the trigger was atrial fibrillation with rapid ventricular response. Admissions were ordered for 75.4% of the patients overall (81.6% of digoxin-treated patients vs 74.8% of nontreated patients; P .001). The ED stay was prolonged in 38.3% of patients discharged from the ED (52.9% of digoxin-treated patients vs 37.2% of nontreated patients; P .001). The duration of hospital stay was prolonged in 48.1% (digoxin-treated, 49.3% vs 47.9%; P = .385). In-hospital mortality was 7.2% overall (6.9% vs 7.2%, P= .712), and 30-day mortality was 9.7% (9.3% vs 9.7%, P = .625). ED use of digoxin was associated with a prolonged stay in the department (adjusted OR, 1.883; 95% CI, 1.359-2.608) but not with hospitalization or mortality.

Conclusion: Digoxin continues to be used in one out of ten ED patients who are not already on long-term treatment with the drug. Digoxin use is associated with cardiac decompensation triggered by atrial fibrillation with rapid ventricular response, younger age, women, and patients with better initial NYHA function status but possibly more severe decompensation. Digoxin use leads to a longer ED stay but is safe, as it is not associated with need for admission, prolonged hospitalization, or short-term mortality.

分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
急诊科使用地高辛治疗急性心力衰竭患者及其对短期疗效的影响。
摘要分析急诊科使用地高辛治疗急性心力衰竭(AHF)患者的相关因素,以及地高辛治疗对短期疗效的影响:我们纳入了西班牙 45 家急诊科确诊的急性心力衰竭患者。我们根据患者是否在急诊室静脉注射地高辛对这些未接受长期心衰治疗的患者进行了分类。研究人员记录了51个患者或心脏失代偿发作变量,以了解接受地高辛治疗的急诊患者的情况。研究的结果变量包括是否需要入院、出院患者在急诊室停留时间是否延长(> 24 小时)、入院患者的住院时间是否延长(> 7 天)以及全因住院或 30 天死亡率。研究了地高辛治疗与结果之间的关系,并根据患者和 AHF 病程特征调整了几率比 (OR):分析了 15 549 名患者(中位年龄 83 岁,55% 为女性)的数据,其中 1430 人(9.2%)接受了地高辛治疗。女性、年轻患者和纽约心脏协会(NYHA)分级较好但心脏失代偿较严重的患者更常使用地高辛,尤其是在心房颤动引发快速心室反应的情况下。75.4%的患者被要求入院治疗(81.6%的地高辛治疗患者与74.8%的未治疗患者相比;P .001)。38.3%的急诊室出院患者的急诊室住院时间延长(52.9%的地高辛治疗患者与 37.2%的非治疗患者;P .001)。48.1%的患者住院时间延长(接受地高辛治疗的患者为49.3%,未接受地高辛治疗的患者为47.9%;P = .385)。院内死亡率为 7.2%(6.9% vs 7.2%,P= .712),30 天死亡率为 9.7%(9.3% vs 9.7%,P= .625)。急诊科使用地高辛与住院时间延长有关(调整后OR,1.883;95% CI,1.359-2.608),但与住院或死亡率无关:结论:每十名急诊科患者中就有一名尚未长期使用地高辛。使用地高辛与心房颤动引发的心脏失代偿、快速心室反应、年轻、女性以及初始 NYHA 功能状态较好但失代偿可能较严重的患者有关。使用地高辛会导致患者在急诊室停留时间延长,但这是安全的,因为它与入院需求、住院时间延长或短期死亡率无关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Adherence to the Extracorporeal Treatments in Poisoning Workgroup recommendations for lithium intoxication: the SILITOX study. Artificial-intelligence-based neurological outcome prediction during out-of-hospital cardiac arrest. Characteristics and short- and long-term outcomes in patients aged 65 years or older living in nursing homes: the Emergency Department and Elder Needs-40 study. Concordance between risk assessment scales for venous thromboembolism in medical patients in the emergency department. Effectiveness and safety of vernakalant vs flecainide for cardioversion of atrial fibrillation in the emergency department: the VERITA study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1