Effectiveness of Specific Single-Use Incisional Negative Pressure Wound Therapy (PICO System) After Major Lower Extremity Amputation.

Hiroshi Takahashi, Shinsuke Takeda, Yoshihiro Tanaka, Ryutaro Shibata, Hiroki Ito, Shingo Kurahashi, So Mitsuya, Hideki Murakami
{"title":"Effectiveness of Specific Single-Use Incisional Negative Pressure Wound Therapy (PICO System) After Major Lower Extremity Amputation.","authors":"Hiroshi Takahashi, Shinsuke Takeda, Yoshihiro Tanaka, Ryutaro Shibata, Hiroki Ito, Shingo Kurahashi, So Mitsuya, Hideki Murakami","doi":"10.1177/15347346231221116","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Lower extremity amputation (LEA), particularly in patients with diabetes or peripheral vascular disease, often results in complications such as surgical site infections (SSIs) and wound dehiscence. This study examined whether utilizing the portable and user-friendly PICO system (Smith and Nephew Medical Ltd, Hull, UK) as incisional negative-pressure wound therapy can reduce post-LEA complications. This study was conducted at a Japanese tertiary medical center and involved a retrospective analysis of LEA cases (n = 32) between January 2021 and December 2022. The PICO dressing group (n = 16) was compared to the conventional dressing group (n = 16) for post-LEA wound management. The primary outcome was the incidence of postoperative wound complications, including SSI and wound dehiscence, within 15 days of LEA. Superficial/deep SSI and wound dehiscence occurred less frequently in the PICO dressing group than in the conventional dressing group (12.5% vs 43.8%; p = .054). There were no cases of deep SSIs in the PICO dressing group. Although this study has limitations owing to its retrospective design and small sample size, the results suggest the potential of the PICO system for improving outcomes in post-LEA wound management.</p>","PeriodicalId":94229,"journal":{"name":"The international journal of lower extremity wounds","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The international journal of lower extremity wounds","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/15347346231221116","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Lower extremity amputation (LEA), particularly in patients with diabetes or peripheral vascular disease, often results in complications such as surgical site infections (SSIs) and wound dehiscence. This study examined whether utilizing the portable and user-friendly PICO system (Smith and Nephew Medical Ltd, Hull, UK) as incisional negative-pressure wound therapy can reduce post-LEA complications. This study was conducted at a Japanese tertiary medical center and involved a retrospective analysis of LEA cases (n = 32) between January 2021 and December 2022. The PICO dressing group (n = 16) was compared to the conventional dressing group (n = 16) for post-LEA wound management. The primary outcome was the incidence of postoperative wound complications, including SSI and wound dehiscence, within 15 days of LEA. Superficial/deep SSI and wound dehiscence occurred less frequently in the PICO dressing group than in the conventional dressing group (12.5% vs 43.8%; p = .054). There were no cases of deep SSIs in the PICO dressing group. Although this study has limitations owing to its retrospective design and small sample size, the results suggest the potential of the PICO system for improving outcomes in post-LEA wound management.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
下肢大截肢后特定一次性切口负压伤口疗法(PICO 系统)的有效性
下肢截肢(LEA),尤其是糖尿病或外周血管疾病患者的下肢截肢往往会导致手术部位感染(SSI)和伤口开裂等并发症。本研究探讨了利用便携式和用户友好型 PICO 系统(Smith and Nephew Medical Ltd,英国赫尔市)作为切口负压伤口疗法是否能减少 LEA 术后并发症。本研究在日本一家三级医疗中心进行,对2021年1月至2022年12月期间的LEA病例(32例)进行了回顾性分析。PICO敷料组(n = 16)与传统敷料组(n = 16)在LEA术后伤口处理方面进行了比较。主要结果是 LEA 术后 15 天内伤口并发症的发生率,包括 SSI 和伤口开裂。与传统敷料组相比,PICO 敷料组发生浅层/深层 SSI 和伤口开裂的频率较低(12.5% vs 43.8%;P = .054)。PICO 敷料组没有发生深部 SSI。虽然这项研究因其回顾性设计和样本量较小而存在局限性,但研究结果表明 PICO 系统在改善LEA 术后伤口管理的效果方面具有潜力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
A Network Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials on the Comparative Efficacy of Stem Cells Therapy for Diabetic Foot Ulcer Healing. Analysis of Genetic Risk Factors Associated with Charcot Foot Based on the FinnGen Study R9 Data: A Wide-angle Mendelian Randomization Study. Manifestations of Endocrine Disease in the Lower Extremities: Beyond the Diabetic Foot. Evolving Strategies in the Management of Venous Leg Ulcers. Early Tissue Resection Versus Watchful Waiting After Revascularization for Chronic Limb-Threatening Ischemia: A Meta-Analysis.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1