Boosting Algorithms based Cuff-less Blood Pressure Estimation from Clinically Relevant ECG and PPG Morphological Features.

Aayushman Ghosh, Sayan Sarkar, Haipeng Liu, Subhamoy Mandal
{"title":"Boosting Algorithms based Cuff-less Blood Pressure Estimation from Clinically Relevant ECG and PPG Morphological Features.","authors":"Aayushman Ghosh, Sayan Sarkar, Haipeng Liu, Subhamoy Mandal","doi":"10.1109/EMBC40787.2023.10340405","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Blood Pressure (BP) is often coined as a critical physiological marker for cardiovascular health. Multiple studies have explored either Photoplethysmogram (PPG) or ECG-PPG derived features for continuous BP estimation using machine learning (ML); deep learning (DL) techniques. Majority of those derived features often lack a stringent biological explanation and are not significantly correlated with BP. In this paper, we identified several clinically relevant (bio-inspired) ECG and PPG features; and exploited them to estimate Systolic (SBP), and Diastolic Blood Pressure (DBP) values using CatBoost, and AdaBoost algorithms. The estimation performance was then compared against popular ML algorithms. SBP and DBP achieved a Pearson's correlation coefficient of 0.90 and 0.83 between estimated and target BP values. The estimated mean absolute error (MAE) values are 3.81 and 2.22 mmHg with a Standard Deviation of 6.24 and 3.51 mmHg, respectively, for SBP and DBP using CatBoost. The results surpassed the Advancement of Medical Instrumentation (AAMI) standards. For the British Hypertension Society (BHS) protocol, the results achieved for all the BP categories resided in Grade A. Further investigation reveals that bio-inspired features along with tuned ML models can produce comparable results w.r.t parameter-intensive DL networks. ln(HR × mNPV), HR, BMI index, ageing index, and PPG-K point were identified as the top five key features for estimating BP. The group-based analysis further concludes that a trade-off lies between the number of features and MAE. Increasing the no. of features beyond a certain threshold saturates the reduction in MAE.</p>","PeriodicalId":72237,"journal":{"name":"Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society. IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society. Annual International Conference","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society. IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society. Annual International Conference","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/EMBC40787.2023.10340405","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Blood Pressure (BP) is often coined as a critical physiological marker for cardiovascular health. Multiple studies have explored either Photoplethysmogram (PPG) or ECG-PPG derived features for continuous BP estimation using machine learning (ML); deep learning (DL) techniques. Majority of those derived features often lack a stringent biological explanation and are not significantly correlated with BP. In this paper, we identified several clinically relevant (bio-inspired) ECG and PPG features; and exploited them to estimate Systolic (SBP), and Diastolic Blood Pressure (DBP) values using CatBoost, and AdaBoost algorithms. The estimation performance was then compared against popular ML algorithms. SBP and DBP achieved a Pearson's correlation coefficient of 0.90 and 0.83 between estimated and target BP values. The estimated mean absolute error (MAE) values are 3.81 and 2.22 mmHg with a Standard Deviation of 6.24 and 3.51 mmHg, respectively, for SBP and DBP using CatBoost. The results surpassed the Advancement of Medical Instrumentation (AAMI) standards. For the British Hypertension Society (BHS) protocol, the results achieved for all the BP categories resided in Grade A. Further investigation reveals that bio-inspired features along with tuned ML models can produce comparable results w.r.t parameter-intensive DL networks. ln(HR × mNPV), HR, BMI index, ageing index, and PPG-K point were identified as the top five key features for estimating BP. The group-based analysis further concludes that a trade-off lies between the number of features and MAE. Increasing the no. of features beyond a certain threshold saturates the reduction in MAE.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
基于提升算法的无袖带血压估算,源自临床相关的心电图和血压计形态特征。
血压(BP)通常被称为心血管健康的重要生理指标。多项研究利用机器学习(ML)和深度学习(DL)技术探索了用于连续血压估算的光电血压计(PPG)或心电图-PPG 导出特征。这些衍生特征大多缺乏严格的生物学解释,与血压的相关性也不明显。在本文中,我们确定了几个与临床相关的(生物启发)ECG 和 PPG 特征,并利用它们使用 CatBoost 和 AdaBoost 算法估算收缩压 (SBP) 和舒张压 (DBP) 值。然后将估算结果与流行的 ML 算法进行了比较。SBP 和 DBP 的估计值与目标血压值之间的皮尔逊相关系数分别为 0.90 和 0.83。使用 CatBoost 算法,SBP 和 DBP 的估计平均绝对误差 (MAE) 值分别为 3.81 和 2.22 mmHg,标准偏差分别为 6.24 和 3.51 mmHg。结果超过了美国医学仪器发展协会(AAMI)的标准。在英国高血压协会(BHS)的协议中,所有血压类别的结果均为 A 级。进一步的研究表明,生物启发特征与经过调整的 ML 模型可产生与参数密集型 DL 网络相当的结果。ln(HR × mNPV)、HR、BMI 指数、老化指数和 PPG-K 点被确定为估计血压的五大关键特征。基于分组的分析进一步得出结论,在特征数量和 MAE 之间需要权衡。特征数量的增加超过一定阈值后,MAE 的降低就会达到饱和。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Cleverballoon: An integrated approach for developing a drug-coated balloon with everolimus. Machine Learning Models Predict the Need of Amputation and/or Peripheral Artery Revascularization in Hypertensive Patients Within 7-Years Follow-Up. WebPPG: Feasibility and Usability of Self-Performed, Browser-Based Smartphone Photoplethysmography. Wireless and Wearable Auditory EEG Acquisition Hardware Using Around-The-Ear cEEGrid Electrodes. Machine learning-based classification and risk factor analysis of frailty in Korean community-dwelling older adults.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1