Anastomotic Leak in Colorectal Surgery: Predictive Factors and Survival.

Swetha Prabhakaran, Sowmya Prabhakaran, Wei Mou Lim, Glen Guerra, Alexander G Heriot, Joseph C Kong
{"title":"Anastomotic Leak in Colorectal Surgery: Predictive Factors and Survival.","authors":"Swetha Prabhakaran, Sowmya Prabhakaran, Wei Mou Lim, Glen Guerra, Alexander G Heriot, Joseph C Kong","doi":"10.5604/01.3001.0016.1602","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>&lt;br&gt;&lt;b&gt;Introduction:&lt;/b&gt; Anastomotic leak (AL) is a serious complication following colorectal surgery.&lt;/br&gt; &lt;br&gt;&lt;b&gt;Aim:&lt;/b&gt; The aim of this study was to identify factors associated with the development of AL and to analyze its impact on survival.&lt;/br&gt; &lt;br&gt;&lt;b&gt;Materials and methods:&lt;/b&gt; All consecutive adult colorectal cancer resections performed between 2007 and 2020 with curative intent and anastomosis formation were included from a prospectively maintained database. The primary outcome measure was the rate of AL. The secondary outcome measure was 5-year overall survival (OS).&lt;/br&gt; &lt;br&gt;&lt;b&gt;Results:&lt;/b&gt; There were 6837 eligible patients. The rate of AL was 2.2% and 4.0% in patients with colon and rectal cancer, respectively. AL was a significant independent predictor of reduced 5-year OS in patients who underwent curative surgery for rectal cancer (odds ratio 2.293, p = 0.009). Emergency surgery (p = 0.015), surgery at a public hospital (p = 0.002), and an open surgical approach (p = 0.021) were all associated with a significantly higher risk of AL in patients with colon cancer, with higher rates of AL noted in left colectomies as compared to right hemicolectomies (4.4% &lt;i&gt;vs.&lt;/i&gt; 1.3%, p &lt; 0.001). In rectal cancer patients, AL was associated with neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (p = 0.038) and male gender (p = 0.002). The anastomosis formation technique (hand-sewn &lt;i&gt;vs.&lt;/i&gt; stapled) did not impact the rate of AL (p = 0.116 and p = 0.198 with colon and rectal cancer, respectively).&lt;/br&gt; &lt;br&gt;&lt;b&gt;Discussion:&lt;/b&gt; Clinicians should be cognizant of the predictive factors for AL and should consider early intervention for at-risk patients.&lt;/br&gt.</p>","PeriodicalId":501107,"journal":{"name":"Polski przeglad chirurgiczny","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Polski przeglad chirurgiczny","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5604/01.3001.0016.1602","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

<br><b>Introduction:</b> Anastomotic leak (AL) is a serious complication following colorectal surgery.</br> <br><b>Aim:</b> The aim of this study was to identify factors associated with the development of AL and to analyze its impact on survival.</br> <br><b>Materials and methods:</b> All consecutive adult colorectal cancer resections performed between 2007 and 2020 with curative intent and anastomosis formation were included from a prospectively maintained database. The primary outcome measure was the rate of AL. The secondary outcome measure was 5-year overall survival (OS).</br> <br><b>Results:</b> There were 6837 eligible patients. The rate of AL was 2.2% and 4.0% in patients with colon and rectal cancer, respectively. AL was a significant independent predictor of reduced 5-year OS in patients who underwent curative surgery for rectal cancer (odds ratio 2.293, p = 0.009). Emergency surgery (p = 0.015), surgery at a public hospital (p = 0.002), and an open surgical approach (p = 0.021) were all associated with a significantly higher risk of AL in patients with colon cancer, with higher rates of AL noted in left colectomies as compared to right hemicolectomies (4.4% <i>vs.</i> 1.3%, p < 0.001). In rectal cancer patients, AL was associated with neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (p = 0.038) and male gender (p = 0.002). The anastomosis formation technique (hand-sewn <i>vs.</i> stapled) did not impact the rate of AL (p = 0.116 and p = 0.198 with colon and rectal cancer, respectively).</br> <br><b>Discussion:</b> Clinicians should be cognizant of the predictive factors for AL and should consider early intervention for at-risk patients.</br>.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
结直肠手术中的吻合口漏:预测因素与存活率。
</br><b>引言:</b>吻合口漏(AL)是结直肠手术后的一种严重并发症。</br></br><b>材料和方法:</b>所有在 2007 年至 2020 年期间进行的连续性成人结直肠癌切除术均来自于一个前瞻性维护的数据库,这些切除术均以治愈为目的并形成了吻合。主要结果指标是AL率。次要结局指标是 5 年总生存率 (OS)。</br> <br><b>结果:</b> 共有 6837 名符合条件的患者。结肠癌和直肠癌患者的AL率分别为2.2%和4.0%。在接受直肠癌根治性手术的患者中,AL是降低5年生存率的重要独立预测因素(几率比2.293,P = 0.009)。急诊手术(p = 0.015)、公立医院手术(p = 0.002)和开放手术方式(p = 0.021)都与结肠癌患者发生 AL 的风险显著升高有关,左半结肠切除术与右半结肠切除术相比,AL 发生率更高(4.4% <i>vs.</i> 1.3%,p <0.001)。在直肠癌患者中,AL与新辅助化放疗(p = 0.038)和男性性别(p = 0.002)有关。吻合口形成技术(手缝<i>vs.</i>钉合)对 AL 的发生率没有影响(结肠癌和直肠癌的发生率分别为 p = 0.116 和 p = 0.198)</br><br><b>讨论:</b>临床医生应了解 AL 的预测因素,并应考虑对高危患者进行早期干预</br>.
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The influence of supportive therapy with a six-component myophlebotropic preparation on the reduction of symptoms in patients with symptoms of hemorrhoidal disease. Mental Health, and Eating Disorders in Patients After Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass Surgery (RYGB). Current approach to the management of preoperative iron deficiency anemia in colorectal cancer patients: a review of literature. Applicability of sodium butyrate preparations from a surgeon's and gastroenterologist's perspective. Gastro-entero-pancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms (GEP-NENs) - Current literature review of diagnostics and therapy. What has changed in the management?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1