Efficacy of Kantakari Avaleha and its modified dosage form of Kantakari Avaleha granules in the management of bronchial asthma - An open-label randomized controlled clinical trial.

Ayu Pub Date : 2022-07-01 Epub Date: 2023-10-09 DOI:10.4103/ayu.AYU_311_20
U R S R K Senarthne, Mandip Goyal, Bishwajyoti Patgiri
{"title":"Efficacy of <i>Kantakari Avaleha</i> and its modified dosage form of <i>Kantakari Avaleha</i> granules in the management of bronchial asthma - An open-label randomized controlled clinical trial.","authors":"U R S R K Senarthne, Mandip Goyal, Bishwajyoti Patgiri","doi":"10.4103/ayu.AYU_311_20","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Bronchial asthma is a common chronic episodic respiratory disease that resemblance to <i>Tamaka Shwasa</i> in Ayurveda. <i>Kantakari Avaleha</i> is one of the primarily recommended formulations for the management of <i>Shwasa</i> (bronchial asthma), <i>Kasa</i> (cough), and <i>Hikka</i> (hiccup). Although <i>Avaleha</i> dosage forms are better medicaments, granules have an added advantage over them such as palatability, less moisture content, and easy handling. For this purpose, <i>Kantakari Avaleha</i> was modified into <i>Kantakari Avaleha</i> granules by modifying the operational procedures of <i>Kantakari Avaleha</i>.</p><p><strong>Aims: </strong>To evaluate and compare the efficacy of <i>Kantakari Avaleha</i> and <i>Kantakari Avaleha</i> granules in the management of bronchial asthma.</p><p><strong>Materials and method: </strong>A total of 69 patients with mild to moderate bronchial asthma were selected randomly and divided into groups A and B. Patients of groups A were treated with <i>Kantakari Avaleha</i>, whereas patients of groups B received <i>Kantakari Avaleha</i> granules. These dosage forms of <i>Kantakari</i> were given in the dose of six grams with lukewarm water before breakfast and dinner for 60 days and followed up for the next 30 days. Assessments were done before and after treatment as per the scoring patterns of international asthma guidelines of the Global Initiative for Asthma (GINA), Asthma Control Questionnaire (ACQ), Asthma Control Test (ACT), and Respiratory Rate (RR), Breath-Holding Time (BHT), Peak Expiratory Flow Volume (PEFV), and laboratory investigations such as complete blood count, liver and kidney function tests, and urine routine examination were also carried out. Paired <i>t</i>-test and Wilcoxon signed-rank test were applied to evaluate the effect of therapy in the individual group for the above-mentioned criteria. While the comparison of results between the groups was done by applying the coefficient of variation (CV).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Group A showed better results in most of the cardinal symptoms, ACT, and ACQ, except for BHT, RR, and GINA control in terms of CV. In both the groups, statistically, highly significant improvement was found as per the overall assessment of bronchial asthma such as ACQ, ACT, and number of episodes and the difference between the groups was statistically insignificant.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Both dosage forms of <i>Kantkari</i> were found to be effective treatments for bronchial asthma with significant relieving capacity as internal use for over 2 months. Hence, <i>Kantakari Avaleha</i> granules could be substituted for <i>Kantakari Avaleha</i>.</p>","PeriodicalId":502094,"journal":{"name":"Ayu","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10710229/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ayu","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/ayu.AYU_311_20","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/10/9 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Bronchial asthma is a common chronic episodic respiratory disease that resemblance to Tamaka Shwasa in Ayurveda. Kantakari Avaleha is one of the primarily recommended formulations for the management of Shwasa (bronchial asthma), Kasa (cough), and Hikka (hiccup). Although Avaleha dosage forms are better medicaments, granules have an added advantage over them such as palatability, less moisture content, and easy handling. For this purpose, Kantakari Avaleha was modified into Kantakari Avaleha granules by modifying the operational procedures of Kantakari Avaleha.

Aims: To evaluate and compare the efficacy of Kantakari Avaleha and Kantakari Avaleha granules in the management of bronchial asthma.

Materials and method: A total of 69 patients with mild to moderate bronchial asthma were selected randomly and divided into groups A and B. Patients of groups A were treated with Kantakari Avaleha, whereas patients of groups B received Kantakari Avaleha granules. These dosage forms of Kantakari were given in the dose of six grams with lukewarm water before breakfast and dinner for 60 days and followed up for the next 30 days. Assessments were done before and after treatment as per the scoring patterns of international asthma guidelines of the Global Initiative for Asthma (GINA), Asthma Control Questionnaire (ACQ), Asthma Control Test (ACT), and Respiratory Rate (RR), Breath-Holding Time (BHT), Peak Expiratory Flow Volume (PEFV), and laboratory investigations such as complete blood count, liver and kidney function tests, and urine routine examination were also carried out. Paired t-test and Wilcoxon signed-rank test were applied to evaluate the effect of therapy in the individual group for the above-mentioned criteria. While the comparison of results between the groups was done by applying the coefficient of variation (CV).

Results: Group A showed better results in most of the cardinal symptoms, ACT, and ACQ, except for BHT, RR, and GINA control in terms of CV. In both the groups, statistically, highly significant improvement was found as per the overall assessment of bronchial asthma such as ACQ, ACT, and number of episodes and the difference between the groups was statistically insignificant.

Conclusion: Both dosage forms of Kantkari were found to be effective treatments for bronchial asthma with significant relieving capacity as internal use for over 2 months. Hence, Kantakari Avaleha granules could be substituted for Kantakari Avaleha.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Kantakari Avaleha 及其改良剂型 Kantakari Avaleha 颗粒剂治疗支气管哮喘的疗效--一项开放标签随机对照临床试验。
背景:支气管哮喘是一种常见的慢性偶发性呼吸道疾病,在阿育吠陀中与 Tamaka Shwasa 相似。Kantakari Avaleha 是治疗 Shwasa(支气管哮喘)、Kasa(咳嗽)和 Hikka(打嗝)的主要推荐配方之一。虽然 Avaleha 的剂型是更好的药物,但颗粒剂比它们更有优势,如适口性好、含水量少和易于操作。目的:评估并比较 Kantakari Avaleha 和 Kantakari Avaleha 颗粒剂在治疗支气管哮喘方面的疗效:A 组患者接受 Kantakari Avaleha 治疗,B 组患者接受 Kantakari Avaleha 颗粒剂治疗。这些剂型的 Kantakari 均以 6 克的剂量在早餐和晚餐前用温水送服,持续 60 天,并在接下来的 30 天进行随访。治疗前后按照全球哮喘倡议(GINA)国际哮喘指南的评分模式、哮喘控制问卷(ACQ)、哮喘控制测试(ACT)、呼吸频率(RR)、屏气时间(BHT)、呼气峰流速(PEFV)进行了评估,还进行了实验室检查,如全血计数、肝肾功能检查和尿常规检查。根据上述标准,采用配对 t 检验和 Wilcoxon 符号秩检验来评价各组的治疗效果。组间结果比较采用变异系数(CV):结果:就变异系数而言,除 BHT、RR 和 GINA 控制外,A 组在大多数主要症状、ACT 和 ACQ 方面的效果更好。两组的 ACQ、ACT 和发作次数等支气管哮喘总体评估结果均有显著改善,组间差异无统计学意义:两种剂型的 Kantkari 均可有效治疗支气管哮喘,内服两个月以上可明显缓解症状。因此,可以用 Kantakari Avaleha 颗粒代替 Kantakari Avaleha。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Ayu
Ayu
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Safety and efficacy of COROPROTECT kit as an add-on therapy in the management of mild-to-moderate COVID-19: A randomized, placebo-controlled trial. Use of checkerboard assay to determine the synergy between essential oils extracted from leaves of Aegle marmelos (L.) Correa and nystatin against Candida albicans. Comparative Pharmacognostic study of market samples of Tagara collected from five different markets of Kerala with the official source plant Valeriana jatamansi Jones ex Roxb. Erratum: Balchaturbhadra Churna as a potential medicine for SARS-CoV2 infection in pediatric setting an in silico study. Evaluation of the anti-arthritic activity of Rhuflex-F - A proprietary Ayurvedic herbomineral formulation in albino rats.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1