When and how does decoy effect work? The roles of salience and risk aversion in the consumer decision-making process

IF 5.9 3区 管理学 Q1 BUSINESS Electronic Commerce Research and Applications Pub Date : 2023-12-19 DOI:10.1016/j.elerap.2023.101354
Sixuan Chen , Junhong Zhao , Huan Xu , Zhangxiang Zhu
{"title":"When and how does decoy effect work? The roles of salience and risk aversion in the consumer decision-making process","authors":"Sixuan Chen ,&nbsp;Junhong Zhao ,&nbsp;Huan Xu ,&nbsp;Zhangxiang Zhu","doi":"10.1016/j.elerap.2023.101354","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The decoy effect has attracted much attention in the field of marketing and indicates that consumers’ preferences between two options will change after adding a third asymmetrically decoy option. Marketers usually hope for the decoy strategy to help improve a consumer’s preference for a target product. However, both empirical evidence and real-world examples show that the effectiveness of the decoy effect is not uniform. This paper proposes an adjusted consumer decision model based on salience theory and presents the results of an eye-tracking experiment to provide empirical evidence for it. The results show that risk aversion can moderate the effect of a decoy on salience and further impact preferences for a target product. Our study makes theoretical contributions that extend salience-based explanations for the decoy effect and have practical implications for marketers seeking to formulate effective decoy strategies, especially in the electronic commerce environment.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":50541,"journal":{"name":"Electronic Commerce Research and Applications","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":5.9000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1567422323001199/pdfft?md5=e5dee3c6560181c44169ade06ee8fb39&pid=1-s2.0-S1567422323001199-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Electronic Commerce Research and Applications","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1567422323001199","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BUSINESS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The decoy effect has attracted much attention in the field of marketing and indicates that consumers’ preferences between two options will change after adding a third asymmetrically decoy option. Marketers usually hope for the decoy strategy to help improve a consumer’s preference for a target product. However, both empirical evidence and real-world examples show that the effectiveness of the decoy effect is not uniform. This paper proposes an adjusted consumer decision model based on salience theory and presents the results of an eye-tracking experiment to provide empirical evidence for it. The results show that risk aversion can moderate the effect of a decoy on salience and further impact preferences for a target product. Our study makes theoretical contributions that extend salience-based explanations for the decoy effect and have practical implications for marketers seeking to formulate effective decoy strategies, especially in the electronic commerce environment.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
诱饵效应何时以及如何发挥作用?显著性和风险规避在消费者决策过程中的作用
诱饵效应在市场营销领域备受关注,它表明在添加第三个不对称的诱饵选项后,消费者对两个选项的偏好会发生变化。营销人员通常希望诱饵策略有助于提高消费者对目标产品的偏好。然而,经验证据和现实案例都表明,诱饵效应的有效性并不统一。本文以显著性理论为基础,提出了一个调整后的消费者决策模型,并展示了眼动追踪实验的结果,为其提供了实证证据。结果表明,风险规避可以缓和诱饵对显著性的影响,并进一步影响对目标产品的偏好。我们的研究在理论上做出了贡献,扩展了基于显著性的诱饵效应解释,对营销人员寻求制定有效的诱饵策略具有实际意义,尤其是在电子商务环境中。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Electronic Commerce Research and Applications
Electronic Commerce Research and Applications 工程技术-计算机:跨学科应用
CiteScore
10.10
自引率
8.30%
发文量
97
审稿时长
63 days
期刊介绍: Electronic Commerce Research and Applications aims to create and disseminate enduring knowledge for the fast-changing e-commerce environment. A major dilemma in e-commerce research is how to achieve a balance between the currency and the life span of knowledge. Electronic Commerce Research and Applications will contribute to the establishment of a research community to create the knowledge, technology, theory, and applications for the development of electronic commerce. This is targeted at the intersection of technological potential and business aims.
期刊最新文献
Who should provide a trade-in service under the online agency-selling mode? Home is best: Review source and cross-border online shopping Sustaining superior visibility within digital platforms through inside and outside competitive action repertoires The effects of physician’s brand positioning on diagnostic dispensing continuity and cross-provincial healthcare flow: Evidence from an online traditional Chinese medicine community Physical stores versus physical showrooms: Channel structures of online retailers
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1