Urinary Cell Gene Signature of Acute Rejection in Kidney Allografts

Thalia Salinas, Carol Li, Catherine Snopkowski, Vijay K Sharma, Darshana M Dadhania, Karsten Suhre, Thangamani Muthukumar, Manikkam Suthanthiran
{"title":"Urinary Cell Gene Signature of Acute Rejection in Kidney Allografts","authors":"Thalia Salinas, Carol Li, Catherine Snopkowski, Vijay K Sharma, Darshana M Dadhania, Karsten Suhre, Thangamani Muthukumar, Manikkam Suthanthiran","doi":"10.1101/2023.12.18.23300165","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction. A kidney allograft biopsy may display acute T cell-mediated rejection (TCMR), antibody-mediated rejection (ABMR), or concurrent TCMR + ABMR (MR). Development of noninvasive biomarkers diagnostic of all three types of acute rejection is a useful addition to the diagnostic armamentarium.\nMethods. We developed customized RT-qPCR assays and measured urinary cell mRNA copy number in 145 biopsy-matched urine samples from 126 kidney allograft recipients and calculated urinary cell three-gene signature score from log10-transformed values for the 18S-normalized CD3E mRNA, 18S-normalized CXCL10 mRNA and 18S rRNA. We determined whether the signature score in biopsy-matched urine specimens discriminates biopsies without rejection (NR, n=50) from biopsies displaying TCMR (n=47), ABMR (n=28) or MR (n=20).\nResults. Urinary cell three-gene signature discriminated TCMR, ABMR or MR biopsies from NR biopsies (P <0.0001, One-way ANOVA). Dunnett's multiple comparisons test yielded P<0.0001 for NR vs. TCMR; P <0.001 for NR vs. ABMR; and P <0.0001 for NR vs. MR. By bootstrap resampling, optimism-corrected area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) was 0.749 (bias-corrected 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.638 to 0.840) for NR vs. TCMR (P<0.0001); 0.780 (95% CI, 0.656 to 0.878) for NR vs. ABMR (P<0.0001); and 0.857 (95% CI, 0.727 to 0.947) for NR vs. MR (P<0.0001). All three rejection biopsy categories were distinguished from NR biopsies with similar accuracy (all AUC comparisons P>0.05).\nConclusion. Urinary cell three-gene signature score may serve as a universal diagnostic signature of acute rejection due to TCMR, ABMR or MR in human kidney allografts with similar performance characteristics.","PeriodicalId":501561,"journal":{"name":"medRxiv - Transplantation","volume":"21 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"medRxiv - Transplantation","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1101/2023.12.18.23300165","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction. A kidney allograft biopsy may display acute T cell-mediated rejection (TCMR), antibody-mediated rejection (ABMR), or concurrent TCMR + ABMR (MR). Development of noninvasive biomarkers diagnostic of all three types of acute rejection is a useful addition to the diagnostic armamentarium. Methods. We developed customized RT-qPCR assays and measured urinary cell mRNA copy number in 145 biopsy-matched urine samples from 126 kidney allograft recipients and calculated urinary cell three-gene signature score from log10-transformed values for the 18S-normalized CD3E mRNA, 18S-normalized CXCL10 mRNA and 18S rRNA. We determined whether the signature score in biopsy-matched urine specimens discriminates biopsies without rejection (NR, n=50) from biopsies displaying TCMR (n=47), ABMR (n=28) or MR (n=20). Results. Urinary cell three-gene signature discriminated TCMR, ABMR or MR biopsies from NR biopsies (P <0.0001, One-way ANOVA). Dunnett's multiple comparisons test yielded P<0.0001 for NR vs. TCMR; P <0.001 for NR vs. ABMR; and P <0.0001 for NR vs. MR. By bootstrap resampling, optimism-corrected area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) was 0.749 (bias-corrected 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.638 to 0.840) for NR vs. TCMR (P<0.0001); 0.780 (95% CI, 0.656 to 0.878) for NR vs. ABMR (P<0.0001); and 0.857 (95% CI, 0.727 to 0.947) for NR vs. MR (P<0.0001). All three rejection biopsy categories were distinguished from NR biopsies with similar accuracy (all AUC comparisons P>0.05). Conclusion. Urinary cell three-gene signature score may serve as a universal diagnostic signature of acute rejection due to TCMR, ABMR or MR in human kidney allografts with similar performance characteristics.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
肾脏异体移植急性排斥反应的尿细胞基因特征
导言。肾移植活检可能显示急性T细胞介导的排斥反应(TCMR)、抗体介导的排斥反应(ABMR)或TCMR + ABMR(MR)并发症。开发可诊断所有三种急性排斥反应的无创生物标记物是对诊断手段的有益补充。我们开发了定制的 RT-qPCR 检测方法,测量了来自 126 名肾脏异体移植受者的 145 份活检匹配尿液样本的尿细胞 mRNA 拷贝数,并根据 18S 归一化 CD3E mRNA、18S 归一化 CXCL10 mRNA 和 18S rRNA 的对数 10 转换值计算了尿细胞三基因特征得分。我们确定了活检匹配尿液标本中的特征得分是否能区分无排斥反应的活检样本(NR,n=50)和显示TCMR(n=47)、ABMR(n=28)或MR(n=20)的活检样本。尿液细胞三基因特征将 TCMR、ABMR 或 MR 活检组织与 NR 活检组织区分开来(P <0.0001,单因素方差分析)。Dunnett 多重比较检验结果显示,NR 与 TCMR 的比较结果为 P<0.0001;NR 与 ABMR 的比较结果为 P<0.001;NR 与 MR 的比较结果为 P<0.0001。749(偏倚校正 95% 置信区间 [CI],0.638 至 0.840)(P<0.0001);NR vs. TCMR 为 0.780(95% CI,0.656 至 0.878)(P<0.0001);NR vs. MR 为 0.857(95% CI,0.727 至 0.947)(P<0.0001)。所有三种排斥活检类别与NR活检的区分准确性相似(所有AUC比较P>0.05)。尿液细胞三基因特征评分可作为人类肾脏异体移植中TCMR、ABMR或MR所致急性排斥反应的通用诊断特征,其表现特征相似。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Access to Allogeneic Cell Transplantation Based on Donor Search Prognosis: An Interventional Trial Donor HLA class 1 evolutionary divergence and late allograft rejection after liver transplantation in children: an emulated target trial. Improving Deceased Donor Kidney Utilization: Predicting Risk of Nonuse with Interpretable Models Improvements in Patient-Reported Functioning after Lung Transplant is Associated with Improved Quality of Life and Survival Influence of Information Access on Organ Donation: A Questionnaire-Based Cross-Sectional Study
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1