Rates of breastfeeding initiation and duration in the United States: data insights from the 2016–2019 Pregnancy Risk Assessment Monitoring System

IF 3.4 3区 医学 Q2 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH Frontiers in Public Health Pub Date : 2023-12-19 DOI:10.3389/fpubh.2023.1256432
Laura E. Diaz, Lynn M. Yee, Joe Feinglass
{"title":"Rates of breastfeeding initiation and duration in the United States: data insights from the 2016–2019 Pregnancy Risk Assessment Monitoring System","authors":"Laura E. Diaz, Lynn M. Yee, Joe Feinglass","doi":"10.3389/fpubh.2023.1256432","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"IntroductionWhile breastfeeding rates in the United States have been increasing, they remain low by international standards with substantial racial, income and education disparities. This study uses recent population-based data to analyze sociodemographic differences in breastfeeding initiation, duration, and exposure to information and education.MethodsWe used the 2016–2019 Pregnancy Risk Assessment Monitoring System (PRAMS) to compare breastfeeding duration among a representative population from 43 states and the District of Columbia. We modeled the likelihood of never initiating breastfeeding by respondent’s age, race and ethnicity, language, marital status, household income, educational attainment, parity and insurance status. We also compared sources of information and education for respondents who never breastfed to those who breastfed up to 6 months.ResultsAmong 142,643 new mother respondents, representing an estimated population of 7,426,725 birthing individuals, 12.6% never breastfed, 60.4% reported breastfeeding at 3 months and 54.7% at 6 months. While 75.8% of college graduates reported breastfeeding at 3 months, this was only 37.8% of respondents with high school or less. Among those with the lowest six-month rates were non-Hispanic Black participants (36.3%) and those age < 20 (25.5%). Respondents with Medicaid coverage for their delivery were 25% more likely to have never breastfed than the privately insured. Respondents reporting household income <$20,000 were 57% more likely to have never breastfed as compared to those with household income>$85,000. While 64.1% of those breastfeeding at 6 months reported receiving information from “my” doctor’, this was only 13.0% of those who never breastfeed.DiscussionImproved breastfeeding rates could have significant effects on reducing health disparities in the United States. Clinical and public health policy initiatives need to include culturally sensitive breastfeeding education before and after childbirth, with psychological and direct support from obstetrics and primary care providers. Health plans should support home and community-based in-person and telelactation consulting services. Public policies such as paid family and medical leave and workplace accommodations will also be critical. Given the huge implications of breastfeeding rates on the development of infant immune defenses and a healthy microbiome, improving breastfeeding rates should be a much more important public health priority in the United States.","PeriodicalId":12548,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in Public Health","volume":"73 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in Public Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2023.1256432","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

IntroductionWhile breastfeeding rates in the United States have been increasing, they remain low by international standards with substantial racial, income and education disparities. This study uses recent population-based data to analyze sociodemographic differences in breastfeeding initiation, duration, and exposure to information and education.MethodsWe used the 2016–2019 Pregnancy Risk Assessment Monitoring System (PRAMS) to compare breastfeeding duration among a representative population from 43 states and the District of Columbia. We modeled the likelihood of never initiating breastfeeding by respondent’s age, race and ethnicity, language, marital status, household income, educational attainment, parity and insurance status. We also compared sources of information and education for respondents who never breastfed to those who breastfed up to 6 months.ResultsAmong 142,643 new mother respondents, representing an estimated population of 7,426,725 birthing individuals, 12.6% never breastfed, 60.4% reported breastfeeding at 3 months and 54.7% at 6 months. While 75.8% of college graduates reported breastfeeding at 3 months, this was only 37.8% of respondents with high school or less. Among those with the lowest six-month rates were non-Hispanic Black participants (36.3%) and those age < 20 (25.5%). Respondents with Medicaid coverage for their delivery were 25% more likely to have never breastfed than the privately insured. Respondents reporting household income <$20,000 were 57% more likely to have never breastfed as compared to those with household income>$85,000. While 64.1% of those breastfeeding at 6 months reported receiving information from “my” doctor’, this was only 13.0% of those who never breastfeed.DiscussionImproved breastfeeding rates could have significant effects on reducing health disparities in the United States. Clinical and public health policy initiatives need to include culturally sensitive breastfeeding education before and after childbirth, with psychological and direct support from obstetrics and primary care providers. Health plans should support home and community-based in-person and telelactation consulting services. Public policies such as paid family and medical leave and workplace accommodations will also be critical. Given the huge implications of breastfeeding rates on the development of infant immune defenses and a healthy microbiome, improving breastfeeding rates should be a much more important public health priority in the United States.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
美国母乳喂养的开始率和持续时间:2016-2019 年妊娠风险评估监测系统的数据启示
导言虽然美国的母乳喂养率一直在上升,但与国际标准相比仍然偏低,而且在种族、收入和教育方面存在巨大差异。本研究利用最新的人口数据分析了母乳喂养的开始、持续时间以及信息和教育接触方面的社会人口差异。方法我们利用 2016-2019 年妊娠风险评估监测系统(PRAMS)比较了来自 43 个州和哥伦比亚特区的代表性人口的母乳喂养持续时间。我们根据受访者的年龄、种族和民族、语言、婚姻状况、家庭收入、教育程度、奇偶性和保险状况,对从未开始母乳喂养的可能性进行了建模。我们还比较了从未进行母乳喂养的受访者和母乳喂养达 6 个月的受访者的信息和教育来源。结果在 142,643 名新妈妈受访者中,有 12.6% 的人从未进行过母乳喂养,60.4% 的人在 3 个月时进行过母乳喂养,54.7% 的人在 6 个月时进行过母乳喂养。75.8%的大学毕业生在 3 个月时进行了母乳喂养,而在高中或高中以下学历的受访者中,这一比例仅为 37.8%。6 个月母乳喂养率最低的是非西班牙裔黑人受访者(36.3%)和 20 岁受访者(25.5%)。与私人投保的受访者相比,享受医疗补助(Medicaid)分娩保险的受访者从未进行母乳喂养的可能性要高出 25%。与家庭收入为 85,000 美元的受访者相比,家庭收入为 20,000 美元的受访者从未进行过母乳喂养的可能性要高出 57%。在母乳喂养 6 个月的人群中,64.1% 的人表示从 "我的 "医生那里获得了相关信息,而在从未进行过母乳喂养的人群中,这一比例仅为 13.0%。临床和公共卫生政策措施需要包括产前和产后的文化敏感性母乳喂养教育,以及产科和初级保健提供者的心理和直接支持。医疗计划应支持基于家庭和社区的面对面和远程哺乳咨询服务。带薪家庭和医疗假以及工作场所便利等公共政策也至关重要。鉴于母乳喂养率对婴儿免疫防御系统和健康微生物组的发育具有巨大影响,提高母乳喂养率应成为美国公共卫生领域更为重要的优先事项。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Frontiers in Public Health
Frontiers in Public Health Medicine-Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
7.70%
发文量
4469
审稿时长
14 weeks
期刊介绍: Frontiers in Public Health is a multidisciplinary open-access journal which publishes rigorously peer-reviewed research and is at the forefront of disseminating and communicating scientific knowledge and impactful discoveries to researchers, academics, clinicians, policy makers and the public worldwide. The journal aims at overcoming current fragmentation in research and publication, promoting consistency in pursuing relevant scientific themes, and supporting finding dissemination and translation into practice. Frontiers in Public Health is organized into Specialty Sections that cover different areas of research in the field. Please refer to the author guidelines for details on article types and the submission process.
期刊最新文献
Canadian adaptive platform trial of treatments for COVID in community settings (CanTreatCOVID): recruitment strategies of a decentralized, national randomized controlled trial for acute SARS-CoV-2. Psychometric validation of the Spanish HLS-EU-Q16 in Ecuador: evidence for health literacy assessment and public health education. Penn, Social Systems, and the Community: fostering equity-focused public health practice through asynchronous learning. Commentary: Psychological well-being, mental distress, metabolic syndrome, and associated factors among people living in a refugee camp in Greece: a cross-sectional study. Public Health Hackathon: empowering high school students as tomorrow's leaders and innovators in public health.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1