Management of mild degenerative cervical myelopathy and asymptomatic spinal cord compression: an international survey

IF 2.1 4区 医学 Q3 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY Spinal cord Pub Date : 2023-12-21 DOI:10.1038/s41393-023-00945-8
Jamie F. M. Brannigan, Benjamin M. Davies, Oliver D. Mowforth, Ratko Yurac, Vishal Kumar, Joost Dejaegher, Juan J. Zamorano, Rory K. J. Murphy, Manjul Tripathi, David B. Anderson, James Harrop, Granit Molliqaj, Guy Wynne-Jones, Jose Joefrey F. Arbatin, So Kato, Manabu Ito, Jefferson Wilson, Ronie Romelean, Nicolas Dea, Daniel Graves, Enrico Tessitore, Allan R. Martin, Aria Nouri
{"title":"Management of mild degenerative cervical myelopathy and asymptomatic spinal cord compression: an international survey","authors":"Jamie F. M. Brannigan, Benjamin M. Davies, Oliver D. Mowforth, Ratko Yurac, Vishal Kumar, Joost Dejaegher, Juan J. Zamorano, Rory K. J. Murphy, Manjul Tripathi, David B. Anderson, James Harrop, Granit Molliqaj, Guy Wynne-Jones, Jose Joefrey F. Arbatin, So Kato, Manabu Ito, Jefferson Wilson, Ronie Romelean, Nicolas Dea, Daniel Graves, Enrico Tessitore, Allan R. Martin, Aria Nouri","doi":"10.1038/s41393-023-00945-8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Cross-sectional survey. Currently there is limited evidence and guidance on the management of mild degenerative cervical myelopathy (DCM) and asymptomatic spinal cord compression (ASCC). Anecdotal evidence suggest variance in clinical practice. The objectives of this study were to assess current practice and to quantify the variability in clinical practice. Spinal surgeons and some additional health professionals completed a web-based survey distributed by email to members of AO Spine and the Cervical Spine Research Society (CSRS) North American Society. Questions captured experience with DCM, frequency of DCM patient encounters, and standard of practice in the assessment of DCM. Further questions assessed the definition and management of mild DCM, and the management of ASCC. A total of 699 respondents, mostly surgeons, completed the survey. Every world region was represented in the responses. Half (50.1%, n = 359) had greater than 10 years of professional experience with DCM. For mild DCM, standardised follow-up for non-operative patients was reported by 488 respondents (69.5%). Follow-up included a heterogeneous mix of investigations, most often at 6-month intervals (32.9%, n = 158). There was some inconsistency regarding which clinical features would cause a surgeon to counsel a patient towards surgery. Practice for ASCC aligned closely with mild DCM. Finally, there were some contradictory definitions of mild DCM provided in the form of free text. Professionals typically offer outpatient follow up for patients with mild DCM and/or asymptomatic ASCC. However, what this constitutes varies widely. Further research is needed to define best practice and support patient care.","PeriodicalId":21976,"journal":{"name":"Spinal cord","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.nature.com/articles/s41393-023-00945-8.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Spinal cord","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.nature.com/articles/s41393-023-00945-8","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Cross-sectional survey. Currently there is limited evidence and guidance on the management of mild degenerative cervical myelopathy (DCM) and asymptomatic spinal cord compression (ASCC). Anecdotal evidence suggest variance in clinical practice. The objectives of this study were to assess current practice and to quantify the variability in clinical practice. Spinal surgeons and some additional health professionals completed a web-based survey distributed by email to members of AO Spine and the Cervical Spine Research Society (CSRS) North American Society. Questions captured experience with DCM, frequency of DCM patient encounters, and standard of practice in the assessment of DCM. Further questions assessed the definition and management of mild DCM, and the management of ASCC. A total of 699 respondents, mostly surgeons, completed the survey. Every world region was represented in the responses. Half (50.1%, n = 359) had greater than 10 years of professional experience with DCM. For mild DCM, standardised follow-up for non-operative patients was reported by 488 respondents (69.5%). Follow-up included a heterogeneous mix of investigations, most often at 6-month intervals (32.9%, n = 158). There was some inconsistency regarding which clinical features would cause a surgeon to counsel a patient towards surgery. Practice for ASCC aligned closely with mild DCM. Finally, there were some contradictory definitions of mild DCM provided in the form of free text. Professionals typically offer outpatient follow up for patients with mild DCM and/or asymptomatic ASCC. However, what this constitutes varies widely. Further research is needed to define best practice and support patient care.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
轻度退行性颈椎病和无症状脊髓压迫症的治疗:一项国际调查
研究设计横断面调查。目的目前,关于轻度退行性颈椎脊髓病(DCM)和无症状脊髓压迫症(ASCC)的管理证据和指导非常有限。本研究的目的是评估当前的实践,并量化临床实践中的差异。方法脊柱外科医生和其他一些医疗专业人员完成了一项基于网络的调查,该调查通过电子邮件发送给 AO Spine 和北美颈椎研究学会 (CSRS) 的会员。调查问题包括 DCM 经验、与 DCM 患者接触的频率以及评估 DCM 的实践标准。其他问题还评估了轻度 DCM 的定义和管理以及 ASCC 的管理。世界各地区均有代表参与回答。半数受访者(50.1%,n = 359)拥有 10 年以上的 DCM 专业经验。对于轻度 DCM,488 名受访者(69.5%)报告了非手术患者的标准化随访情况。随访包括各种不同的检查,最常见的是每 6 个月随访一次(32.9%,n = 158)。关于哪些临床特征会导致外科医生建议患者接受手术治疗,存在一些不一致之处。ASCC 的做法与轻度 DCM 非常一致。最后,以自由文本形式提供的轻度 DCM 的定义存在一些矛盾。结论专业人员通常会为轻度 DCM 和/或无症状 ASCC 患者提供门诊随访。然而,这其中所包含的内容却大相径庭。需要进一步开展研究,以确定最佳实践并支持患者护理。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Spinal cord
Spinal cord 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
9.10%
发文量
142
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: Spinal Cord is a specialised, international journal that has been publishing spinal cord related manuscripts since 1963. It appears monthly, online and in print, and accepts contributions on spinal cord anatomy, physiology, management of injury and disease, and the quality of life and life circumstances of people with a spinal cord injury. Spinal Cord is multi-disciplinary and publishes contributions across the entire spectrum of research ranging from basic science to applied clinical research. It focuses on high quality original research, systematic reviews and narrative reviews. Spinal Cord''s sister journal Spinal Cord Series and Cases: Clinical Management in Spinal Cord Disorders publishes high quality case reports, small case series, pilot and retrospective studies perspectives, Pulse survey articles, Point-couterpoint articles, correspondences and book reviews. It specialises in material that addresses all aspects of life for persons with spinal cord injuries or disorders. For more information, please see the aims and scope of Spinal Cord Series and Cases.
期刊最新文献
Bibliometric analysis of the inflammation expression after spinal cord injury: current research status and emerging frontiers. Tract-specific magnetization transfer ratio provides insights into the severity of degenerative cervical myelopathy. The spinal cord injury (SCI) peer support evaluation tool: the development of a tool to assess outcomes of peer support programs within SCI community-based organizations. Cognitive assessment during inpatient rehabilitation after spinal cord injury, a retrospective cross-sectional study Self-reported benzodiazepine use among adults with chronic spinal cord injury in the southeastern USA: associations with demographic, injury, and opioid use characteristics
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1