Carrying capacity for tree biomass of a subtropical mangrove along a river in Japan inferred from forest structural features

IF 1.7 4区 环境科学与生态学 Q3 ECOLOGY Ecological Research Pub Date : 2023-12-18 DOI:10.1111/1440-1703.12437
A. T. M. Zinnatul Bassar, Rempei Suwa, Takashi Kanda, Masako Dannoura
{"title":"Carrying capacity for tree biomass of a subtropical mangrove along a river in Japan inferred from forest structural features","authors":"A. T. M. Zinnatul Bassar, Rempei Suwa, Takashi Kanda, Masako Dannoura","doi":"10.1111/1440-1703.12437","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"A subtropical mangrove along the Miyara River in Ishigaki Island, Japan was studied for evaluating the carrying capacity for biomass of the mangrove stands. The stem diameters <i>D</i>, tree height <i>H</i>, and fine roots mass were measured, while aboveground biomass (<i>AGB</i>) and belowground coarse root biomass (<i>BGB</i><sub>coarse</sub>) were estimated. The <i>AGB</i>, <i>BGB</i><sub>coarse</sub>, and fine root mass were estimated as 130, 31, and 13 Mg ha<sup>−1</sup> in the <i>Rhizophora stylosa</i>; 271, 94, and 11 Mg ha<sup>−1</sup> in the downstream <i>Bruguiera gymnorrhiza</i>; and, 228, 81, and 6.4 Mg ha<sup>−1</sup> in the upstream <i>B. gymnorrhiza</i> stand, respectively. The <i>AGB</i> and <i>BGB</i><sub>coarse</sub> in the <i>R. stylosa</i> stand were significantly lower than <i>B. gymnorrhiza</i> stands, and fine root mass was significantly higher than upstream <i>B. gymnorrhiza</i> stand. Significantly lower mean individual phytomass <i>w</i><sub>t</sub> specific to tree density <i>ρ</i> of <i>R. stylosa</i> stand than <i>B. gymnorrhiza</i> stand in the <i>ρ</i> − <i>w</i><sub>t</sub> relationship denoted the lower carrying capacity for <i>AGB</i> of <i>R. stylosa</i> than that of <i>B. gymnorrhiza</i>. The results showed that high soil pore water salinity and low pH at the downstream did not limit biomass and potential canopy height <i>H</i><sub>max</sub> of mangrove along a river gradient but <i>AGB</i> and <i>BGB</i><sub>coarse</sub> differed between different species at the same edaphic environment. Analysis of aboveground and belowground biomass variations between stands of two mangrove species along environmental gradients from upstream to downstream could be useful in assessing the consequences of sea level rise in relation to climate change on the evolution of blue carbon dynamics.","PeriodicalId":11434,"journal":{"name":"Ecological Research","volume":"38 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ecological Research","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/1440-1703.12437","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

A subtropical mangrove along the Miyara River in Ishigaki Island, Japan was studied for evaluating the carrying capacity for biomass of the mangrove stands. The stem diameters D, tree height H, and fine roots mass were measured, while aboveground biomass (AGB) and belowground coarse root biomass (BGBcoarse) were estimated. The AGB, BGBcoarse, and fine root mass were estimated as 130, 31, and 13 Mg ha−1 in the Rhizophora stylosa; 271, 94, and 11 Mg ha−1 in the downstream Bruguiera gymnorrhiza; and, 228, 81, and 6.4 Mg ha−1 in the upstream B. gymnorrhiza stand, respectively. The AGB and BGBcoarse in the R. stylosa stand were significantly lower than B. gymnorrhiza stands, and fine root mass was significantly higher than upstream B. gymnorrhiza stand. Significantly lower mean individual phytomass wt specific to tree density ρ of R. stylosa stand than B. gymnorrhiza stand in the ρ − wt relationship denoted the lower carrying capacity for AGB of R. stylosa than that of B. gymnorrhiza. The results showed that high soil pore water salinity and low pH at the downstream did not limit biomass and potential canopy height Hmax of mangrove along a river gradient but AGB and BGBcoarse differed between different species at the same edaphic environment. Analysis of aboveground and belowground biomass variations between stands of two mangrove species along environmental gradients from upstream to downstream could be useful in assessing the consequences of sea level rise in relation to climate change on the evolution of blue carbon dynamics.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
从森林结构特征推断日本河流沿岸亚热带红树林树木生物量的承载能力
研究人员对日本石垣岛宫原河畔的亚热带红树林进行了研究,以评估红树林的生物量承载能力。测量了茎干直径 D、树高 H 和细根质量,并估算了地上生物量(AGB)和地下粗根生物量(BGBcoarse)。据估计,Rhizophora stylosa 的 AGB、BGBcoarse 和细根质量分别为 130、31 和 13 Mg ha-1;下游 Bruguiera gymnorrhiza 的 AGB、BGBcoarse 和细根质量分别为 271、94 和 11 Mg ha-1;上游 B. gymnorrhiza 的 AGB、BGBcoarse 和细根质量分别为 228、81 和 6.4 Mg ha-1。R.stylosa林分的AGB和BGBcoarse显著低于B.gymnorrhiza林分,而细根质量显著高于上游B.gymnorrhiza林分。在 ρ - wt 关系中,R. stylosa 的平均单株植物量 wt 与树木密度 ρ 的比值明显低于 B. gymnorrhiza,这表明 R. stylosa 的 AGB 承载能力低于 B. gymnorrhiza。结果表明,下游土壤孔隙水盐度高和 pH 值低并不限制沿河梯度红树林的生物量和潜在冠层高度 Hmax,但在相同的土壤环境下,不同物种的 AGB 和 BGBcoarse 存在差异。分析从上游到下游环境梯度上两种红树林的地上和地下生物量变化,有助于评估海平面上升与气候变化对蓝碳动态演变的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Ecological Research
Ecological Research 环境科学-生态学
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
5.00%
发文量
87
审稿时长
5.6 months
期刊介绍: Ecological Research has been published in English by the Ecological Society of Japan since 1986. Ecological Research publishes original papers on all aspects of ecology, in both aquatic and terrestrial ecosystems.
期刊最新文献
Issue Information Acknowledgments to reviewers Copper, lead, and zinc tolerance and accumulation in the Australian rattle pods Crotalaria novae-hollandiae, C. medicaginea, and C. mitchellii Transfer of potentially toxic metals and metalloids from terrestrial plants to arthropods—A mini review Concentrations and inter-element correlations of seven essential elements in wild plants of Japan
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1