Training in cortically-blind fields confers patient-specific benefit against retinal thinning after occipital stroke

Berkeley K Fahrenthold, Matthew R Cavanaugh, Madhura Tamhankar, Byron L Lam, Steven E Feldon, Brent A Johnson, Krystel R Huxlin
{"title":"Training in cortically-blind fields confers patient-specific benefit against retinal thinning after occipital stroke","authors":"Berkeley K Fahrenthold, Matthew R Cavanaugh, Madhura Tamhankar, Byron L Lam, Steven E Feldon, Brent A Johnson, Krystel R Huxlin","doi":"10.1101/2023.12.19.23298260","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Purpose: Damage to the adult primary visual cortex (V1) causes vision loss in the contralateral hemifield, initiating a process of trans-synaptic retrograde degeneration (TRD). Here, we examined retinal correlates of TRD using a new metric to account for global changes in inner retinal thickness, and asked if perceptual training in the intact or blind field impacts its progression.\nMethods: We performed a meta-analysis of optical coherence tomography (OCT) data in 48 participants with unilateral V1 stroke and homonymous visual defects, who completed clinical trial NCT03350919. After measuring the thickness of the macular ganglion cell and inner plexiform layers (GCL-IPL), and the peripapillary retinal nerve fiber layer (RNFL), we computed individual laterality indices (LI) at baseline and after ~6 months of daily motion discrimination training in the intact- or blind-field. Increasingly positive LI denoted greater layer thinning in retinal regions affected versus unaffected by the cortical damage.\nResults: Pre-training, the affected GCL-IPL and RNFL were thinner than their unaffected counterparts, generating LI values positively correlated with time since stroke. Participants trained in their intact-field exhibited increased LIGCL-IPL. Those trained in their blind-field had no significant change in LIGCL-IPL. LIRNFL did not change in either group.\nConclusions: Relative shrinkage of the affected versus unaffected macular GCL-IPL can be reliably measured at an individual level and increases with time post-V1 stroke. Relative thinning progressed during intact-field training, but appeared to be halted by training within the blind field, suggesting a potentially neuroprotective effect of this simple behavioral intervention.","PeriodicalId":501390,"journal":{"name":"medRxiv - Ophthalmology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"medRxiv - Ophthalmology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1101/2023.12.19.23298260","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: Damage to the adult primary visual cortex (V1) causes vision loss in the contralateral hemifield, initiating a process of trans-synaptic retrograde degeneration (TRD). Here, we examined retinal correlates of TRD using a new metric to account for global changes in inner retinal thickness, and asked if perceptual training in the intact or blind field impacts its progression. Methods: We performed a meta-analysis of optical coherence tomography (OCT) data in 48 participants with unilateral V1 stroke and homonymous visual defects, who completed clinical trial NCT03350919. After measuring the thickness of the macular ganglion cell and inner plexiform layers (GCL-IPL), and the peripapillary retinal nerve fiber layer (RNFL), we computed individual laterality indices (LI) at baseline and after ~6 months of daily motion discrimination training in the intact- or blind-field. Increasingly positive LI denoted greater layer thinning in retinal regions affected versus unaffected by the cortical damage. Results: Pre-training, the affected GCL-IPL and RNFL were thinner than their unaffected counterparts, generating LI values positively correlated with time since stroke. Participants trained in their intact-field exhibited increased LIGCL-IPL. Those trained in their blind-field had no significant change in LIGCL-IPL. LIRNFL did not change in either group. Conclusions: Relative shrinkage of the affected versus unaffected macular GCL-IPL can be reliably measured at an individual level and increases with time post-V1 stroke. Relative thinning progressed during intact-field training, but appeared to be halted by training within the blind field, suggesting a potentially neuroprotective effect of this simple behavioral intervention.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
大脑皮层盲区训练能使患者在枕叶中风后视网膜变薄方面受益
目的:成人初级视觉皮层(V1)受损会导致对侧半视野视力下降,从而启动跨突触逆行变性(TRD)过程。在这里,我们使用一种新的指标来解释视网膜内层厚度的整体变化,研究了TRD的视网膜相关性,并询问在完整视野或盲区进行的知觉训练是否会影响TRD的进展:我们对完成了 NCT03350919 临床试验的 48 名单侧 V1 中风和同性视觉缺陷患者的光学相干断层扫描(OCT)数据进行了荟萃分析。在测量了黄斑神经节细胞层和内丛状层(GCL-IPL)以及毛细血管周围视网膜神经纤维层(RNFL)的厚度后,我们计算了基线时和在完好视场或盲场进行每日运动分辨训练约 6 个月后的个体侧向指数(LI)。LI指数越高,表示受皮层损伤影响的视网膜区域与未受皮层损伤影响的视网膜区域的视网膜层越薄:结果:训练前,受影响的 GCL-IPL 和 RNFL 比未受影响的薄,产生的 LI 值与中风后的时间呈正相关。在完好视场接受训练的学员表现出 LIGCL-IPL 增加。接受盲区训练的人 LIGCL-IPL 没有明显变化。两组的 LIRNFL 均无变化:结论:受影响黄斑 GCL-IPL 相对于未受影响黄斑 GCL-IPL 的相对萎缩可在个体水平上进行可靠测量,并随着 V1 中风后时间的推移而增加。在完整视野训练过程中,相对变薄的程度不断加深,但在盲视野内进行训练后,这种现象似乎会停止,这表明这种简单的行为干预具有潜在的神经保护作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Prediction of the ectasia screening index from raw Casia2 volume data for keratoconus identification by using convolutional neural networks Utilizing AI-Generated Plain Language Summaries to Enhance Interdisciplinary Understanding of Ophthalmology Notes: A Randomized Trial Deep Learning-Based Detection of Reticular Pseudodrusen in Age-Related Macular Degeneration on Optical Coherence Tomography Photoreceptor outer segment reflectivity with ultrahigh resolution visible light optical coherence tomography in systemic hydroxychloroquine use Comparison of visual function analysis of people with low vision using three different models of augmented reality devices
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1