Evaluation of the National Competence Based Catalogue of Learning Objectives (NKLM 2.0) for undergraduate medical education at the Medical School Hannover.

IF 1.5 Q2 EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES GMS Journal for Medical Education Pub Date : 2023-11-15 eCollection Date: 2023-01-01 DOI:10.3205/zma001650
Marie Mikuteit, Ingo Just, Sandra Steffens
{"title":"Evaluation of the National Competence Based Catalogue of Learning Objectives (NKLM 2.0) for undergraduate medical education at the Medical School Hannover.","authors":"Marie Mikuteit, Ingo Just, Sandra Steffens","doi":"10.3205/zma001650","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The National Competence-Based Catalogue of Learning Objectives for Undergraduate Medical Education (NKLM) serves as the foundation for curricular development in undergraduate medical education in Germany. A new version of the NKLM was launched in 2021, and medical faculties are now evaluating the learning objectives (LOs). This paper describes the evaluation process used at Hannover Medical School.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The evaluation process was structured in three steps. LOs were rated as \"keep\", \"modify\" or \"delete\". First, the 1133 LOs were compared with the mapping of the Hannover curriculum from 2017. Then, a small team from the Curricular Development Department conducted a pre-evaluation of the 1133 LOs. Finally, a group of clinical experts and students discussed and agreed on the ratings.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>For 868 LOs, one or more counterparts were found in the mapping, but 265 new LOs were not found and thus, classified as new. In the first rating, 779 LOs were kept, 300 were modified (172 due to wording), 45 were deleted, and there was no rating for 9 LOs. The expert group changed 47 of the pre-evaluation decisions. The final rating was to keep 738 LOs, modify 356, and delete 39 LOs.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This method effectively evaluated the LOs from NKLM 2.0 while balancing expert knowledge and an overview of the curriculum.</p>","PeriodicalId":45850,"journal":{"name":"GMS Journal for Medical Education","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10728661/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"GMS Journal for Medical Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3205/zma001650","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The National Competence-Based Catalogue of Learning Objectives for Undergraduate Medical Education (NKLM) serves as the foundation for curricular development in undergraduate medical education in Germany. A new version of the NKLM was launched in 2021, and medical faculties are now evaluating the learning objectives (LOs). This paper describes the evaluation process used at Hannover Medical School.

Methods: The evaluation process was structured in three steps. LOs were rated as "keep", "modify" or "delete". First, the 1133 LOs were compared with the mapping of the Hannover curriculum from 2017. Then, a small team from the Curricular Development Department conducted a pre-evaluation of the 1133 LOs. Finally, a group of clinical experts and students discussed and agreed on the ratings.

Results: For 868 LOs, one or more counterparts were found in the mapping, but 265 new LOs were not found and thus, classified as new. In the first rating, 779 LOs were kept, 300 were modified (172 due to wording), 45 were deleted, and there was no rating for 9 LOs. The expert group changed 47 of the pre-evaluation decisions. The final rating was to keep 738 LOs, modify 356, and delete 39 LOs.

Conclusion: This method effectively evaluated the LOs from NKLM 2.0 while balancing expert knowledge and an overview of the curriculum.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
对汉诺威医学院本科医学教育中基于国家能力的学习目标目录(NKLM 2.0)进行评估。
背景:以能力为基础的国家医学本科教育学习目标目录(NKLM)是德国医学本科教育课程开发的基础。新版 NKLM 于 2021 年推出,医学院目前正在对学习目标(LOs)进行评估。本文介绍了汉诺威医学院的评估过程:评估过程分为三个步骤。学习目标被评为 "保留"、"修改 "或 "删除"。首先,将1133项LO与2017年汉诺威课程图谱进行比较。然后,课程开发部的一个小组对1133项LO进行了预评估。最后,由临床专家和学生组成的小组进行了讨论,并就评分达成了一致意见:结果:868 项学习目标在图谱中找到了一个或多个对应项,但有 265 项新的学习目标没有找到,因此被归类为新的学习目标。在第一次评级中,保留了 779 个学习目标,修改了 300 个(172 个因措辞问题),删除了 45 个,9 个学习目标没有评级。专家组修改了 47 项预评估决定。最后的评定结果是保留 738 项学习成果,修改 356 项,删除 39 项:这种方法有效地评估了NKLM 2.0中的学习目标,同时兼顾了专家知识和课程概况。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
GMS Journal for Medical Education
GMS Journal for Medical Education EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES-
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
12.50%
发文量
30
审稿时长
25 weeks
期刊介绍: GMS Journal for Medical Education (GMS J Med Educ) – formerly GMS Zeitschrift für Medizinische Ausbildung – publishes scientific articles on all aspects of undergraduate and graduate education in medicine, dentistry, veterinary medicine, pharmacy and other health professions. Research and review articles, project reports, short communications as well as discussion papers and comments may be submitted. There is a special focus on empirical studies which are methodologically sound and lead to results that are relevant beyond the respective institution, profession or country. Please feel free to submit qualitative as well as quantitative studies. We especially welcome submissions by students. It is the mission of GMS Journal for Medical Education to contribute to furthering scientific knowledge in the German-speaking countries as well as internationally and thus to foster the improvement of teaching and learning and to build an evidence base for undergraduate and graduate education. To this end, the journal has set up an editorial board with international experts. All manuscripts submitted are subjected to a clearly structured peer review process. All articles are published bilingually in English and German and are available with unrestricted open access. Thus, GMS Journal for Medical Education is available to a broad international readership. GMS Journal for Medical Education is published as an unrestricted open access journal with at least four issues per year. In addition, special issues on current topics in medical education research are also published. Until 2015 the journal was published under its German name GMS Zeitschrift für Medizinische Ausbildung. By changing its name to GMS Journal for Medical Education, we wish to underline our international mission.
期刊最新文献
Academic education of midwives in Germany (part 1): Requirements for bachelor of science programmes in midwifery education. Position paper of the Midwifery Science Committee (AHW) in the DACH Association for Medical Education (GMA). Academic education of midwives in Germany (part 2): Opportunities and challenges for the further development of the profession of midwifery. Position paper of the Midwifery Science Committee (AHW) in the DACH Association for Medical Education (GMA). Beliefs for successful feedback communication. Communication skills of medical students: Evaluation of a new communication curriculum at the University of Augsburg. Good ideas for teaching: Design and implementation of the communication workshop "me as team member" for third-year medical students.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1