The Complexity of Head Movement is Correlated with Learning about Affordances for Walking.

IF 1.1 4区 心理学 Q4 NEUROSCIENCES Journal of Motor Behavior Pub Date : 2024-01-01 Epub Date: 2023-12-21 DOI:10.1080/00222895.2023.2293000
Nicolette A Peterson, Alen Hajnal, Jeffrey B Wagman, Thomas A Stoffregen
{"title":"The Complexity of Head Movement is Correlated with Learning about Affordances for Walking.","authors":"Nicolette A Peterson, Alen Hajnal, Jeffrey B Wagman, Thomas A Stoffregen","doi":"10.1080/00222895.2023.2293000","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>We asked whether the quantitative kinematics of standing postural activity might be related to short-term learning of affordances. Standing participants viewed a narrow path for 15 s, and then gave perceptual reports about the distance that they could walk along the path while wearing a weighted vest (novel affordance) or while not wearing the vest (familiar affordance). In a control condition, participants gave perceptual reports about egocentric distance along the path. During the 15 s viewing intervals, we measured the kinematics of head and torso movement as standing participants made a series of 12 perceptual reports. Perceptual reports improved across trials, but only in the condition in which participants were asked to perceive a novel affordance. The dynamical complexity of head movement changed across trials as participants gave perceptual reports about the novel affordance, but did not change systematically when perceiving a familiar affordance, or a non-affordance egocentric distance. We argue that the dynamical complexity of postural activity may have served an exploratory function supporting the learning of a novel affordance. Our results are consistent with the broader hypothesis that affordances are learned through active engagement with the environment, rather than (for example) through abstract cognitive processing.</p>","PeriodicalId":50125,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Motor Behavior","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Motor Behavior","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/00222895.2023.2293000","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/12/21 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"NEUROSCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

We asked whether the quantitative kinematics of standing postural activity might be related to short-term learning of affordances. Standing participants viewed a narrow path for 15 s, and then gave perceptual reports about the distance that they could walk along the path while wearing a weighted vest (novel affordance) or while not wearing the vest (familiar affordance). In a control condition, participants gave perceptual reports about egocentric distance along the path. During the 15 s viewing intervals, we measured the kinematics of head and torso movement as standing participants made a series of 12 perceptual reports. Perceptual reports improved across trials, but only in the condition in which participants were asked to perceive a novel affordance. The dynamical complexity of head movement changed across trials as participants gave perceptual reports about the novel affordance, but did not change systematically when perceiving a familiar affordance, or a non-affordance egocentric distance. We argue that the dynamical complexity of postural activity may have served an exploratory function supporting the learning of a novel affordance. Our results are consistent with the broader hypothesis that affordances are learned through active engagement with the environment, rather than (for example) through abstract cognitive processing.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
头部运动的复杂性与学习行走能力有关
我们的问题是,站立姿势活动的定量运动学是否可能与承受能力的短期学习有关。站立的受试者观看一条狭窄的小路 15 秒钟,然后就穿上配重背心(新的负担能力)或不穿背心(熟悉的负担能力)时沿小路行走的距离给出感知报告。在对照组条件下,被试对沿路的自我中心距离进行感知报告。在 15 秒的观看时间间隔内,我们测量了站立的参与者在进行一系列 12 次感知报告时头部和躯干运动的运动学特性。在各次试验中,感知报告都有所改善,但只有在要求参与者感知新的可承受性的条件下,感知报告才会有所改善。当参与者对新的可承受性做出感知报告时,头部运动的动态复杂性会在各次试验中发生变化,但在感知熟悉的可承受性或非可承受性的自我中心距离时,头部运动的动态复杂性不会发生系统性变化。我们认为,姿势活动的动态复杂性可能起到了支持学习新的可承受性的探索功能。我们的研究结果与更广泛的假设是一致的,即承受能力是通过与环境的积极互动而不是(例如)通过抽象的认知处理来学习的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Motor Behavior
Journal of Motor Behavior 医学-神经科学
CiteScore
3.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
39
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Motor Behavior, a multidisciplinary journal of movement neuroscience, publishes articles that contribute to a basic understanding of motor control. Articles from different disciplinary perspectives and levels of analysis are encouraged, including neurophysiological, biomechanical, electrophysiological, psychological, mathematical and physical, and clinical approaches. Applied studies are acceptable only to the extent that they provide a significant contribution to a basic issue in motor control. Of special interest to the journal are those articles that attempt to bridge insights from different disciplinary perspectives to infer processes underlying motor control. Those approaches may embrace postural, locomotive, and manipulative aspects of motor functions, as well as coordination of speech articulators and eye movements. Articles dealing with analytical techniques and mathematical modeling are welcome.
期刊最新文献
Development of an Effector-Specific Stop Signal Task with Higher Complexity: A Proof-of-Concept Study. Age-Related Development of Bilateral Coordination of the Upper Limbs in Children and Adolescents. Inter-Digit Low Level Force Coordination in a Complex Isometric Pinch Tracking Task Effects of External Pacing Type on the Cross-Education of Motor Skill. Eye Movement Differences in Contact Versus Non-Contact Olympic Athletes.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1