{"title":"Robotic gait training and botulinum toxin injection improve gait in the chronic post-stroke phase: A randomized controlled trial","authors":"Maëva Cotinat , Mathilde Celerier , Clelia Arquillière , Margot Flipo , Nicolas Prieur-Blanc , Jean-Michel Viton , Laurent Bensoussan","doi":"10.1016/j.rehab.2023.101785","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Improving walking ability is one of the main goals of rehabilitation after stroke. When lower limb spasticity increases walking difficulty, botulinum toxin type A (BTx-A) injections can be combined with non-pharmacologic interventions such as intensive rehabilitation using a robotic approach. To the best of our knowledge, no comparisons have been made between the efficacy of robotic gait training and conventional physical therapy in combination with BTx-A injections.</p></div><div><h3>Objective</h3><p>To conduct a randomized controlled trial to compare the efficacy on gait of robotic gait training versus conventional physiotherapy after BTx-A injection into the spastic triceps surae in people after stroke.</p></div><div><h3>Method</h3><p>Thirty-three participants in the chronic stroke phase with triceps surae spasticity inducing gait impairment were included. After BTx-A injection, participants were randomized into 2 groups. Group A underwent robotic gait training (Lokomat®) for 2 weeks, followed by conventional physiotherapy for 2 weeks (<em>n</em> = 15) and Group B underwent the same treatment in reverse order (<em>n</em> = 18). The efficacy of these methods was tested using the 6-minute walk test (6MWT), comparing post-test 1 and post-test 2 with the pre-test.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>After the first period, the 6MWT increased significantly more in Group A than in Group B: the mean difference between the interventions was 33 m (95%CI 9; 58 <em>p</em> = 0.007; <em>g</em> = 0.95), in favor of Group A; after the second period, the 6MWT increased in both groups, but the 30 m difference between the groups still remained (95%CI 5; 55 <em>p</em> = 0.019; <em>g</em> = 0.73).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>Two weeks of robotic gait training performed 2 weeks after BTx-A injections improved walking performance more than conventional physiotherapy. Large-scale studies are now required on the timing of robotic rehabilitation after BTx-A injection.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":56030,"journal":{"name":"Annals of Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine","volume":"67 1","pages":"Article 101785"},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1877065723000568","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background
Improving walking ability is one of the main goals of rehabilitation after stroke. When lower limb spasticity increases walking difficulty, botulinum toxin type A (BTx-A) injections can be combined with non-pharmacologic interventions such as intensive rehabilitation using a robotic approach. To the best of our knowledge, no comparisons have been made between the efficacy of robotic gait training and conventional physical therapy in combination with BTx-A injections.
Objective
To conduct a randomized controlled trial to compare the efficacy on gait of robotic gait training versus conventional physiotherapy after BTx-A injection into the spastic triceps surae in people after stroke.
Method
Thirty-three participants in the chronic stroke phase with triceps surae spasticity inducing gait impairment were included. After BTx-A injection, participants were randomized into 2 groups. Group A underwent robotic gait training (Lokomat®) for 2 weeks, followed by conventional physiotherapy for 2 weeks (n = 15) and Group B underwent the same treatment in reverse order (n = 18). The efficacy of these methods was tested using the 6-minute walk test (6MWT), comparing post-test 1 and post-test 2 with the pre-test.
Results
After the first period, the 6MWT increased significantly more in Group A than in Group B: the mean difference between the interventions was 33 m (95%CI 9; 58 p = 0.007; g = 0.95), in favor of Group A; after the second period, the 6MWT increased in both groups, but the 30 m difference between the groups still remained (95%CI 5; 55 p = 0.019; g = 0.73).
Conclusion
Two weeks of robotic gait training performed 2 weeks after BTx-A injections improved walking performance more than conventional physiotherapy. Large-scale studies are now required on the timing of robotic rehabilitation after BTx-A injection.
期刊介绍:
Annals of Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine covers all areas of Rehabilitation and Physical Medicine; such as: methods of evaluation of motor, sensory, cognitive and visceral impairments; acute and chronic musculoskeletal disorders and pain; disabilities in adult and children ; processes of rehabilitation in orthopaedic, rhumatological, neurological, cardiovascular, pulmonary and urological diseases.