Robotic gait training and botulinum toxin injection improve gait in the chronic post-stroke phase: A randomized controlled trial

IF 3.9 3区 医学 Q1 REHABILITATION Annals of Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine Pub Date : 2023-12-19 DOI:10.1016/j.rehab.2023.101785
Maëva Cotinat , Mathilde Celerier , Clelia Arquillière , Margot Flipo , Nicolas Prieur-Blanc , Jean-Michel Viton , Laurent Bensoussan
{"title":"Robotic gait training and botulinum toxin injection improve gait in the chronic post-stroke phase: A randomized controlled trial","authors":"Maëva Cotinat ,&nbsp;Mathilde Celerier ,&nbsp;Clelia Arquillière ,&nbsp;Margot Flipo ,&nbsp;Nicolas Prieur-Blanc ,&nbsp;Jean-Michel Viton ,&nbsp;Laurent Bensoussan","doi":"10.1016/j.rehab.2023.101785","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Improving walking ability is one of the main goals of rehabilitation after stroke. When lower limb spasticity increases walking difficulty, botulinum toxin type A (BTx-A) injections can be combined with non-pharmacologic interventions such as intensive rehabilitation using a robotic approach. To the best of our knowledge, no comparisons have been made between the efficacy of robotic gait training and conventional physical therapy in combination with BTx-A injections.</p></div><div><h3>Objective</h3><p>To conduct a randomized controlled trial to compare the efficacy on gait of robotic gait training versus conventional physiotherapy after BTx-A injection into the spastic triceps surae in people after stroke.</p></div><div><h3>Method</h3><p>Thirty-three participants in the chronic stroke phase with triceps surae spasticity inducing gait impairment were included. After BTx-A injection, participants were randomized into 2 groups. Group A underwent robotic gait training (Lokomat®) for 2 weeks, followed by conventional physiotherapy for 2 weeks (<em>n</em> = 15) and Group B underwent the same treatment in reverse order (<em>n</em> = 18). The efficacy of these methods was tested using the 6-minute walk test (6MWT), comparing post-test 1 and post-test 2 with the pre-test.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>After the first period, the 6MWT increased significantly more in Group A than in Group B: the mean difference between the interventions was 33 m (95%CI 9; 58 <em>p</em> = 0.007; <em>g</em> = 0.95), in favor of Group A; after the second period, the 6MWT increased in both groups, but the 30 m difference between the groups still remained (95%CI 5; 55 <em>p</em> = 0.019; <em>g</em> = 0.73).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>Two weeks of robotic gait training performed 2 weeks after BTx-A injections improved walking performance more than conventional physiotherapy. Large-scale studies are now required on the timing of robotic rehabilitation after BTx-A injection.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":56030,"journal":{"name":"Annals of Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine","volume":"67 1","pages":"Article 101785"},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1877065723000568","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Improving walking ability is one of the main goals of rehabilitation after stroke. When lower limb spasticity increases walking difficulty, botulinum toxin type A (BTx-A) injections can be combined with non-pharmacologic interventions such as intensive rehabilitation using a robotic approach. To the best of our knowledge, no comparisons have been made between the efficacy of robotic gait training and conventional physical therapy in combination with BTx-A injections.

Objective

To conduct a randomized controlled trial to compare the efficacy on gait of robotic gait training versus conventional physiotherapy after BTx-A injection into the spastic triceps surae in people after stroke.

Method

Thirty-three participants in the chronic stroke phase with triceps surae spasticity inducing gait impairment were included. After BTx-A injection, participants were randomized into 2 groups. Group A underwent robotic gait training (Lokomat®) for 2 weeks, followed by conventional physiotherapy for 2 weeks (n = 15) and Group B underwent the same treatment in reverse order (n = 18). The efficacy of these methods was tested using the 6-minute walk test (6MWT), comparing post-test 1 and post-test 2 with the pre-test.

Results

After the first period, the 6MWT increased significantly more in Group A than in Group B: the mean difference between the interventions was 33 m (95%CI 9; 58 p = 0.007; g = 0.95), in favor of Group A; after the second period, the 6MWT increased in both groups, but the 30 m difference between the groups still remained (95%CI 5; 55 p = 0.019; g = 0.73).

Conclusion

Two weeks of robotic gait training performed 2 weeks after BTx-A injections improved walking performance more than conventional physiotherapy. Large-scale studies are now required on the timing of robotic rehabilitation after BTx-A injection.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
机器人步态训练和肉毒毒素注射可改善中风后慢性期的步态:随机对照试验
背景:提高行走能力是中风后康复治疗的主要目标之一。当下肢痉挛增加行走困难时,可将 A 型肉毒毒素(BTx-A)注射与非药物干预相结合,如使用机器人方法进行强化康复训练。据我们所知,机器人步态训练与传统物理疗法结合BTx-A注射的疗效尚未进行过比较:目的:进行一项随机对照试验,比较在脑卒中患者痉挛的肱三头肌上注射 BTx-A 后,机器人步态训练与传统物理疗法对步态的疗效:方法:纳入33名慢性中风阶段肱三头肌痉挛导致步态障碍的参与者。注射 BTx-A 后,参与者被随机分为两组。A组接受为期两周的机器人步态训练(Lokomat®),然后接受为期两周的常规物理治疗(n = 15),B组以相反的顺序接受相同的治疗(n = 18)。这些方法的疗效通过 6 分钟步行测试(6MWT)进行检验,并将测试后 1 和测试后 2 与测试前进行比较:第一阶段结束后,A 组的 6MWT 增幅明显高于 B 组:干预措施之间的平均差异为 33 米(95%CI 9;58 p = 0.007;g = 0.95),A 组更优;第二阶段结束后,两组的 6MWT 均有所增长,但组间 30 米的差异依然存在(95%CI 5;55 p = 0.019;g = 0.73):结论:在注射 BTx-A 两周后进行为期两周的机器人步态训练比传统物理治疗更能提高步行能力。现在需要对 BTx-A 注射后机器人康复训练的时机进行大规模研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.80
自引率
4.30%
发文量
136
审稿时长
34 days
期刊介绍: Annals of Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine covers all areas of Rehabilitation and Physical Medicine; such as: methods of evaluation of motor, sensory, cognitive and visceral impairments; acute and chronic musculoskeletal disorders and pain; disabilities in adult and children ; processes of rehabilitation in orthopaedic, rhumatological, neurological, cardiovascular, pulmonary and urological diseases.
期刊最新文献
Return to sport after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction - prognostic factors and prognostic models: A systematic review. “From pain to neglect behavior of peripheral origin” Diffusion tensor imaging reveals Papez circuit lesions in severe traumatic brain injury with memory disorder. Simulated breathing in virtual reality does not affect perceived effort during the physical rehabilitation of people with long COVID Intensive interdisciplinary specialized rehabilitation or regular physiotherapy for multiple sclerosis? A randomised controlled trial with economic evaluation
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1