Healthcare Professionals' Perspectives on Improving Dietary Supplement Documentation in the Electronic Medical Record: Current Challenges and Opportunities to Enhance Quality of Care and Patient Safety.

Global advances in integrative medicine and health Pub Date : 2023-12-19 eCollection Date: 2023-01-01 DOI:10.1177/27536130231215029
Zachary O Kadro, Aisha Chilcoat, Jacob Hill, Stephanie Kenney, Catharine Nguyen, Elana Post, Amanda H Corbett, Gary N Asher, Keturah Faurot
{"title":"Healthcare Professionals' Perspectives on Improving Dietary Supplement Documentation in the Electronic Medical Record: Current Challenges and Opportunities to Enhance Quality of Care and Patient Safety.","authors":"Zachary O Kadro, Aisha Chilcoat, Jacob Hill, Stephanie Kenney, Catharine Nguyen, Elana Post, Amanda H Corbett, Gary N Asher, Keturah Faurot","doi":"10.1177/27536130231215029","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Around half the US population uses dietary supplements (DS), and concomitant use with medications is common. Many DS include bioactive substances that can interact with medications; therefore, accurate tracking is critical for patient safety. Unfortunately, documentation of patients' DS use is often missing or incomplete in the electronic medical record (EMR), leaving patients susceptible to potential adverse events. Novel approaches to assist healthcare professionals (HCPs) in capturing patients' DS use are needed.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To assess HCPs' perspectives on challenges and facilitators of DS documentation in the EMR and their opinions on a proposed mHealth application (app) to aid in DS capture.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>HCPs, recruited from professional networks, largely in North Carolina, using purposive sampling, took part in semi-structured interviews. We inquired about HCPs' experiences with DS documentation in the EMR and their opinions about our proposed mHealth app. Interviews were recorded, transcribed, and coded. Thematic analysis included deductive codes based on the interview guide, and inductive codes that emerged during transcript review.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>HCPs (N = 30) included 60% females, mean age 46 ± 10; 70% White. Pharmacists (20%), nurses (17%), and physicians (17%) were the most represented professions. Years in practice ranged from 3-35 years. Most HCPs were concerned about DS safety and potential supplement-drug interactions, and cited several barriers to accurate EMR DS documentation including time constraints, database inconsistencies, and poor patient-HCP communication about DS. HCPs' views on our proposed mHealth app were generally positive. They expressed that our proposed mHealth app could streamline documentation processes and enhance patient-provider communication. HCPs expressed desire for a high-quality mHealth app that includes access to evidence-based DS information, integrates with the EMR, and does not increase time burdens.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>HCPs believe documentation of patients' DS use is important but not accurately captured in the EMR. Support was expressed for our proposed barcode-scanning DS mHealth app.</p>","PeriodicalId":73159,"journal":{"name":"Global advances in integrative medicine and health","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10734342/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Global advances in integrative medicine and health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/27536130231215029","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Around half the US population uses dietary supplements (DS), and concomitant use with medications is common. Many DS include bioactive substances that can interact with medications; therefore, accurate tracking is critical for patient safety. Unfortunately, documentation of patients' DS use is often missing or incomplete in the electronic medical record (EMR), leaving patients susceptible to potential adverse events. Novel approaches to assist healthcare professionals (HCPs) in capturing patients' DS use are needed.

Objective: To assess HCPs' perspectives on challenges and facilitators of DS documentation in the EMR and their opinions on a proposed mHealth application (app) to aid in DS capture.

Methods: HCPs, recruited from professional networks, largely in North Carolina, using purposive sampling, took part in semi-structured interviews. We inquired about HCPs' experiences with DS documentation in the EMR and their opinions about our proposed mHealth app. Interviews were recorded, transcribed, and coded. Thematic analysis included deductive codes based on the interview guide, and inductive codes that emerged during transcript review.

Results: HCPs (N = 30) included 60% females, mean age 46 ± 10; 70% White. Pharmacists (20%), nurses (17%), and physicians (17%) were the most represented professions. Years in practice ranged from 3-35 years. Most HCPs were concerned about DS safety and potential supplement-drug interactions, and cited several barriers to accurate EMR DS documentation including time constraints, database inconsistencies, and poor patient-HCP communication about DS. HCPs' views on our proposed mHealth app were generally positive. They expressed that our proposed mHealth app could streamline documentation processes and enhance patient-provider communication. HCPs expressed desire for a high-quality mHealth app that includes access to evidence-based DS information, integrates with the EMR, and does not increase time burdens.

Conclusion: HCPs believe documentation of patients' DS use is important but not accurately captured in the EMR. Support was expressed for our proposed barcode-scanning DS mHealth app.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
医疗保健专业人员对改进电子病历中膳食补充剂文档的看法:提高医疗质量和患者安全的当前挑战与机遇》(Current Challenges and Opportunities to Enhance of Quality of Care and Patient Safety.
背景:美国约有一半人口使用膳食补充剂(DS),与药物同时使用的情况很普遍。许多膳食补充剂都含有可与药物发生相互作用的生物活性物质;因此,准确追踪对患者安全至关重要。遗憾的是,电子病历(EMR)中关于患者使用保健品的记录往往缺失或不完整,导致患者很容易发生潜在的不良事件。我们需要新的方法来帮助医护人员(HCPs)记录患者使用 DS 的情况:评估医护人员对在 EMR 中记录 DS 所面临的挑战和促进因素的看法,以及他们对拟议的移动医疗应用程序(App)的意见,以帮助采集 DS。方法:采用目的性抽样,从专业网络(主要在北卡罗来纳州)招募的医护人员参加了半结构化访谈。我们询问了 HCPs 在 EMR 中记录 DS 的经验以及他们对我们提议的移动医疗应用程序的意见。我们对访谈进行了记录、转录和编码。主题分析包括基于访谈指南的演绎编码和在审阅记录誊本时出现的归纳编码:高级保健人员(N = 30)中女性占 60%,平均年龄为 46 ± 10 岁;白人占 70%。药剂师(20%)、护士(17%)和医生(17%)是占比最多的职业。从业年限在 3-35 年之间。大多数保健医生都对 DS 安全性和潜在的补充剂与药物之间的相互作用表示担忧,并列举了准确记录 EMR DS 的几个障碍,包括时间限制、数据库不一致以及患者与保健医生之间关于 DS 的沟通不畅。保健医生对我们建议的移动医疗应用程序的看法普遍积极。他们表示,我们建议的移动医疗应用程序可以简化记录流程,加强患者与医疗服务提供者之间的沟通。医疗保健人员表示希望获得一款高质量的移动医疗应用程序,其中包括获取以证据为基础的 DS 信息、与 EMR 集成以及不增加时间负担:HCPs 认为记录患者使用 DS 的情况非常重要,但 EMR 并未准确记录。他们对我们提出的条形码扫描 DS 移动医疗应用程序表示支持。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Needs and Preferences for Remote-Delivered Mindfulness-Based Cognitive Therapy in Patients After Acute Coronary Syndrome: A Qualitative Study. Using PROMIS Methodology to Create Self-Report Measures of Mindfulness and Related Concepts. Patient Experience and Attitudes Toward Electronic Intake and Patient-Reported Outcomes Within an Outpatient Whole Health Center. A Validation Study of the Mindfulness-Based Interventions Teaching Assessment Criteria for Assessing Mindfulness-Based Intervention Teacher Skill: Inter-Rater Reliability and Predictive Validity. Efficacy and Safety of Bacillus coagulans LBSC in Drug Induced Constipation Associated With Functional Gastrointestinal Disorder: A Double-Blind, Randomized, Interventional, Parallel, Controlled Trial a Clinical Study on Bacillus coagulans LBSC for Drug Induced Constipation Associated With FGIDs.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1