Engaging GME Learners in Health System-Aligned Improvement Work in the Clinical Learning Environment.

Glenn Rosenbluth, Lei W Choi, Christy K Boscardin, Ralph Gonzales, Adrienne Green, Antonio Hernandez, Arpana R Vidyarthi, Katherine A Julian, Robert B Baron
{"title":"Engaging GME Learners in Health System-Aligned Improvement Work in the Clinical Learning Environment.","authors":"Glenn Rosenbluth, Lei W Choi, Christy K Boscardin, Ralph Gonzales, Adrienne Green, Antonio Hernandez, Arpana R Vidyarthi, Katherine A Julian, Robert B Baron","doi":"10.1097/JMQ.0000000000000160","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Alignment between graduate medical education (GME) and health system priorities is foundational to meaningful engagement of residents and fellows in systems improvement work within the clinical learning environment. The Residents and Fellows Leading Interprofessional Continuous Improvement Teams program at the University of California San Francisco was designed over a decade ago to address barriers to trainee participation in health system-based improvement work. The program provides structure and support for health system-aligned trainee-led improvement projects in the clinic learning environment. Project champions (residents/fellows) from GME programs attend workshops where they learn improvement methodologies and develop proposals for health system-based improvement projects for their training programs. Proposals are supported by local faculty mentors and are reviewed and approved by GME and health systems' leaders. During the academic year, teams share their progress using visual management boards and interactive leader rounds. The health system provides a modest financial incentive for successful projects. Since the program's inception, thousands of trainees from 58 residency and fellowship programs have participated either as champions or participants in the program at least once, and in total over 300 projects have been implemented. Approximately three-quarters of the specific improvement goals were met, all projects meaningfully engaged residents and fellows, and many projects continued after the learners graduated. This active partnership between GME and a health system created a symbiotic relationship; trainees received education and support to complete improvement projects, while the health system reaped additional benefits from the alignment and impact of the projects. This partnership continues to grow with steady increases in participating programs, spread to partner health systems, and scholarship for trainees and faculty.</p>","PeriodicalId":101338,"journal":{"name":"American journal of medical quality : the official journal of the American College of Medical Quality","volume":" ","pages":"33-41"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American journal of medical quality : the official journal of the American College of Medical Quality","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/JMQ.0000000000000160","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/12/28 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Alignment between graduate medical education (GME) and health system priorities is foundational to meaningful engagement of residents and fellows in systems improvement work within the clinical learning environment. The Residents and Fellows Leading Interprofessional Continuous Improvement Teams program at the University of California San Francisco was designed over a decade ago to address barriers to trainee participation in health system-based improvement work. The program provides structure and support for health system-aligned trainee-led improvement projects in the clinic learning environment. Project champions (residents/fellows) from GME programs attend workshops where they learn improvement methodologies and develop proposals for health system-based improvement projects for their training programs. Proposals are supported by local faculty mentors and are reviewed and approved by GME and health systems' leaders. During the academic year, teams share their progress using visual management boards and interactive leader rounds. The health system provides a modest financial incentive for successful projects. Since the program's inception, thousands of trainees from 58 residency and fellowship programs have participated either as champions or participants in the program at least once, and in total over 300 projects have been implemented. Approximately three-quarters of the specific improvement goals were met, all projects meaningfully engaged residents and fellows, and many projects continued after the learners graduated. This active partnership between GME and a health system created a symbiotic relationship; trainees received education and support to complete improvement projects, while the health system reaped additional benefits from the alignment and impact of the projects. This partnership continues to grow with steady increases in participating programs, spread to partner health systems, and scholarship for trainees and faculty.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
让 GME 学员在临床学习环境中参与与卫生系统一致的改进工作。
医学研究生教育(GME)与医疗系统优先事项之间的一致性,是住院医师和研究员在临床学习环境中切实参与系统改进工作的基础。加州大学旧金山分校的 "住院医师和研究员领导跨专业持续改进团队 "项目设计于十多年前,旨在解决学员参与基于医疗系统的改进工作的障碍。该计划在诊所学习环境中为与医疗系统相一致的受训人员主导的改进项目提供结构和支持。来自 GME 项目的项目负责人(住院医师/研究员)参加研讨会,学习改进方法,并为其培训项目制定基于医疗系统的改进项目提案。提案由当地教师导师提供支持,并由 GME 和医疗系统领导审核批准。在学年期间,各团队通过可视化管理板和互动式领导查房分享他们的进展情况。医疗系统会为成功的项目提供适度的经济奖励。自该计划启动以来,来自 58 个住院医师和研究员培训项目的数千名受训人员以倡导者或参与者的身份至少参与了一次该计划,总共实施了 300 多个项目。约有四分之三的具体改进目标得以实现,所有项目都让住院医师和研究员参与其中,许多项目在学员毕业后仍在继续。全球医学教育与医疗系统之间的这种积极合作关系创造了一种共生关系;学员们在完成改进项目的过程中得到了教育和支持,而医疗系统则从项目的协调和影响中获得了额外的收益。随着参与项目的稳步增加、合作医疗系统的不断扩大以及学员和教师奖学金的不断增加,这种合作关系还在继续发展。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Lack of Standardized Coding Limits Accuracy of Electronic Clinical Quality Measure for Pulmonary Embolism Diagnosis. Six-Year Retrospective Look at the Effects of Institutional Quality Improvement Efforts to Reduce CAUTIs. Complications of Ambulatory Procedures: Prevalence and Hospital Outpatient Department Variation. From Data to Improvement: Social Mechanisms as a Key to Understanding Dashboard Adoption. A Checklist to Improve Acute Stroke Evaluation and Treatment in the Emergency Department.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1