首页 > 最新文献

American journal of medical quality : the official journal of the American College of Medical Quality最新文献

英文 中文
Leapfrog Safety Grades in California Hospitals: A Data Analysis. 加州医院的 Leapfrog 安全评级:数据分析。
Pub Date : 2024-09-01 Epub Date: 2024-08-20 DOI: 10.1097/JMQ.0000000000000200
Daniel Razick, Noorhan Amani, Lara Ali, Mark Bachir, Ahmed Salem, Vijay Khatri

Within the realm of health care quality assessment, quality assurance and safety grading systems play a vital role in gauging hospital performance and communicating results to the general public. The primary objective of this review is to analyze the hospitals in California through the lens of Leapfrog Safety Grades and discuss the complex interplay of geographical location, hospital size, and larger system affiliation status. Leapfrog Safety Grades, hospital characteristics, and geographic information were collected. Hospitals were categorized by geographic region, size, rural/urban classification, and larger system affiliation status. Of the 284 hospitals included in the study, 95 were given a grade of A, 68 given a grade of B, 93 given a grade of C, 23 given a grade of D, 2 given a grade of F, and 3 were not graded. The vast majority of hospitals in California were classified as urban, with 183 falling under this category. The average number of hospital beds and SD was 227 ± 47.57. On average, hospitals that received a grade of D were significantly smaller in size than those that received a grade of A, while hospitals that received a grade of B or C were similar in size. A total of 107 hospitals were affiliated with a larger health care system. About 70% of hospitals affiliated with a system received an A or B grade, while 50% of unaffiliated hospitals received an A or B grade. Results of this study demonstrate a need for improving health care access and quality in medically underserved urban and rural areas. Hospitals affiliated with a larger health care system received higher grades than unaffiliated hospitals, suggesting that affiliation may also play a role in the implementation and mitigation of factors that contribute to Leapfrog Safety Grades.

在医疗质量评估领域,质量保证和安全分级系统在衡量医院绩效和向公众传达结果方面发挥着至关重要的作用。本综述的主要目的是通过 Leapfrog 安全等级的视角对加利福尼亚州的医院进行分析,并讨论地理位置、医院规模和较大系统附属地位之间复杂的相互作用。我们收集了 Leapfrog 安全等级、医院特征和地理信息。医院按地理区域、规模、农村/城市分类和较大系统附属状态进行分类。在纳入研究的 284 家医院中,95 家医院被评为 A 级,68 家医院被评为 B 级,93 家医院被评为 C 级,23 家医院被评为 D 级,2 家医院被评为 F 级,3 家医院未被评级。加利福尼亚州的绝大多数医院被划分为城市医院,其中 183 家属于城市医院。医院床位数的平均值为 227 ± 47.57。平均而言,获得 D 级的医院规模明显小于获得 A 级的医院,而获得 B 级或 C 级的医院规模相近。共有 107 家医院隶属于较大的医疗保健系统。隶属于某个系统的医院中约有 70% 获得了 A 级或 B 级,而未隶属于该系统的医院中则有 50% 获得了 A 级或 B 级。这项研究结果表明,在医疗服务不足的城市和农村地区,有必要改善医疗服务的可及性和质量。隶属于大型医疗保健系统的医院比未隶属于该系统的医院获得了更高的评级,这表明隶属关系也可能在实施和缓解导致 Leapfrog 安全评级的因素方面发挥作用。
{"title":"Leapfrog Safety Grades in California Hospitals: A Data Analysis.","authors":"Daniel Razick, Noorhan Amani, Lara Ali, Mark Bachir, Ahmed Salem, Vijay Khatri","doi":"10.1097/JMQ.0000000000000200","DOIUrl":"10.1097/JMQ.0000000000000200","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Within the realm of health care quality assessment, quality assurance and safety grading systems play a vital role in gauging hospital performance and communicating results to the general public. The primary objective of this review is to analyze the hospitals in California through the lens of Leapfrog Safety Grades and discuss the complex interplay of geographical location, hospital size, and larger system affiliation status. Leapfrog Safety Grades, hospital characteristics, and geographic information were collected. Hospitals were categorized by geographic region, size, rural/urban classification, and larger system affiliation status. Of the 284 hospitals included in the study, 95 were given a grade of A, 68 given a grade of B, 93 given a grade of C, 23 given a grade of D, 2 given a grade of F, and 3 were not graded. The vast majority of hospitals in California were classified as urban, with 183 falling under this category. The average number of hospital beds and SD was 227 ± 47.57. On average, hospitals that received a grade of D were significantly smaller in size than those that received a grade of A, while hospitals that received a grade of B or C were similar in size. A total of 107 hospitals were affiliated with a larger health care system. About 70% of hospitals affiliated with a system received an A or B grade, while 50% of unaffiliated hospitals received an A or B grade. Results of this study demonstrate a need for improving health care access and quality in medically underserved urban and rural areas. Hospitals affiliated with a larger health care system received higher grades than unaffiliated hospitals, suggesting that affiliation may also play a role in the implementation and mitigation of factors that contribute to Leapfrog Safety Grades.</p>","PeriodicalId":101338,"journal":{"name":"American journal of medical quality : the official journal of the American College of Medical Quality","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142006257","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Tips From the Iceberg: Effecting Culture Change in Health Care Teams. 来自冰山的提示:在医疗团队中实现文化变革。
D Matthew Sherrer, Brooke R Vining, Martha Anne Rich

For centuries, fables have been used as teaching aids that bring simple lessons to life through storytelling. The extensive research of John Kotter has been distilled into fable form in the book "Our Iceberg is Melting." Here, we will describe an instance of applying Kotter's eight-step model to overcome relational tension between anesthesiologists and nurse anesthetists and a resultant culture of collaboration at 2 of the authors' academic medical centers.

几个世纪以来,寓言一直被用作教学辅助工具,通过讲故事将简单的道理娓娓道来。在《我们的冰山正在融化》一书中,约翰-科特(John Kotter)的大量研究成果被提炼成寓言形式。在此,我们将介绍作者所在的两家学术医疗中心应用科特的八步模式克服麻醉师和麻醉护士之间关系紧张的实例,以及由此产生的合作文化。
{"title":"Tips From the Iceberg: Effecting Culture Change in Health Care Teams.","authors":"D Matthew Sherrer, Brooke R Vining, Martha Anne Rich","doi":"10.1097/JMQ.0000000000000198","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1097/JMQ.0000000000000198","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>For centuries, fables have been used as teaching aids that bring simple lessons to life through storytelling. The extensive research of John Kotter has been distilled into fable form in the book \"Our Iceberg is Melting.\" Here, we will describe an instance of applying Kotter's eight-step model to overcome relational tension between anesthesiologists and nurse anesthetists and a resultant culture of collaboration at 2 of the authors' academic medical centers.</p>","PeriodicalId":101338,"journal":{"name":"American journal of medical quality : the official journal of the American College of Medical Quality","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-08-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142006258","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
The Healthcare Improvement and Innovation in Quality (THINQ) Collaborative: A Novel Quality Improvement Training Program for Undergraduate and Postgraduate Students. 医疗保健质量改进与创新(THINQ)合作项目:面向本科生和研究生的新颖质量改进培训计划。
Pub Date : 2024-07-01 Epub Date: 2024-06-25 DOI: 10.1097/JMQ.0000000000000192
Dhwani Krishnan, Abhinav Kareddy, Caitlin Chen, Russel Kerbel, Erin Dowling, Wendy Simon, Anna Dermenchyan

The Healthcare Improvement and Innovation in Quality (THINQ) Collaborative is a uniquely designed program that engages undergraduate and postgraduate students to participate in improving health care and addressing important clinical problems. In 9 years, over 120 THINQ Fellows have been trained in quality improvement (QI) frameworks and methodologies focusing on research skills, social justice, leadership development, and problem-solving. Program evaluation has included surveying current and former THINQ Fellows about their experiences with the program and its subsequent impact on their careers. THINQ's research and outreach initiatives have contributed to improvements in workflows and clinical care on topics such as interdisciplinary team communication, discharge and care transition, sepsis management, and physician burnout. The THINQ Program has equipped future health care leaders to engage with and address QI issues in clinical practice. The structures, processes, and outcomes discussed here can guide other institutions in creating similar QI programs.

医疗保健质量改进与创新合作计划(THINQ)是一项设计独特的计划,旨在吸引本科生和研究生参与改进医疗保健和解决重要临床问题。9 年来,已有 120 多名 THINQ 学员接受了质量改进 (QI) 框架和方法方面的培训,重点是研究技能、社会公正、领导力发展和问题解决。项目评估包括调查现任和前任 THINQ 学员参与项目的经历以及项目对他们职业生涯的影响。THINQ 计划的研究和推广活动促进了工作流程和临床护理的改善,涉及的主题包括跨学科团队沟通、出院和护理过渡、脓毒症管理和医生职业倦怠。THINQ 计划使未来的医疗保健领导者有能力参与并解决临床实践中的 QI 问题。这里讨论的结构、流程和成果可以指导其他机构创建类似的 QI 计划。
{"title":"The Healthcare Improvement and Innovation in Quality (THINQ) Collaborative: A Novel Quality Improvement Training Program for Undergraduate and Postgraduate Students.","authors":"Dhwani Krishnan, Abhinav Kareddy, Caitlin Chen, Russel Kerbel, Erin Dowling, Wendy Simon, Anna Dermenchyan","doi":"10.1097/JMQ.0000000000000192","DOIUrl":"10.1097/JMQ.0000000000000192","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The Healthcare Improvement and Innovation in Quality (THINQ) Collaborative is a uniquely designed program that engages undergraduate and postgraduate students to participate in improving health care and addressing important clinical problems. In 9 years, over 120 THINQ Fellows have been trained in quality improvement (QI) frameworks and methodologies focusing on research skills, social justice, leadership development, and problem-solving. Program evaluation has included surveying current and former THINQ Fellows about their experiences with the program and its subsequent impact on their careers. THINQ's research and outreach initiatives have contributed to improvements in workflows and clinical care on topics such as interdisciplinary team communication, discharge and care transition, sepsis management, and physician burnout. The THINQ Program has equipped future health care leaders to engage with and address QI issues in clinical practice. The structures, processes, and outcomes discussed here can guide other institutions in creating similar QI programs.</p>","PeriodicalId":101338,"journal":{"name":"American journal of medical quality : the official journal of the American College of Medical Quality","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11272136/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141447935","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Perception of Ridesharing Among Veterans With Cardiovascular Diseases in the Era of the MISSION Act. 患有心血管疾病的退伍军人对 MISSION 法案时代共享乘车的看法。
Pub Date : 2024-07-01 Epub Date: 2024-06-28 DOI: 10.1097/JMQ.0000000000000193
Pal Shah, Atreya Mishra, Claire Larkin, Tiago Soltes, Mladen I Vidovich

The Maintaining Internal Systems and Strengthening Integrated Outside Networks (MISSION) Act of 2018 expanded veteran's access to community care leading to increased utilization of non-Veterans Affairs (VA) care and prompting concerns about the sustainability and cost-effectiveness of this care model for the VA. This study seeks to explore veterans' attitudes toward ridesharing services as a means of accessing VA-based cardiovascular care. This cross-sectional, quality improvement study utilized a 7-question survey administered to patients in an urban VA Heart Center to assess transportation preferences and opinions on ridesharing. Participants were more likely to support ridesharing if they held a positive opinion of rideshare ( P = 0.024), felt safe utilizing rideshare ( P = 0.025), or were undergoing invasive procedures ( P = 0.007). Distance traveled did not influence support of ridesharing ( P = 0.617). In conclusion, investing in ridesharing for veterans may provide a cost-effective means to improve VA access and continuity of care regardless of distance.

2018 年《维护内部系统和加强综合外部网络(MISSION)法案》扩大了退伍军人获得社区医疗服务的途径,导致非退伍军人事务部(VA)医疗服务的利用率增加,并引发了人们对退伍军人事务部这种医疗模式的可持续性和成本效益的担忧。本研究旨在探讨退伍军人对共享乘车服务作为获得退伍军人事务部心血管护理的一种方式的态度。这项横断面质量改进研究采用了一项 7 个问题的调查,对城市退伍军人心脏中心的患者进行了调查,以评估交通偏好和对共享乘车的看法。如果参与者对共享乘车持积极态度(P = 0.024)、对使用共享乘车感到安全(P = 0.025)或正在接受侵入性手术(P = 0.007),则更有可能支持共享乘车。旅行距离并不影响对共享乘车的支持(P = 0.617)。总之,无论距离远近,为退伍军人投资共享乘车服务可为改善退伍军人医疗服务的可及性和连续性提供一种具有成本效益的方法。
{"title":"Perception of Ridesharing Among Veterans With Cardiovascular Diseases in the Era of the MISSION Act.","authors":"Pal Shah, Atreya Mishra, Claire Larkin, Tiago Soltes, Mladen I Vidovich","doi":"10.1097/JMQ.0000000000000193","DOIUrl":"10.1097/JMQ.0000000000000193","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The Maintaining Internal Systems and Strengthening Integrated Outside Networks (MISSION) Act of 2018 expanded veteran's access to community care leading to increased utilization of non-Veterans Affairs (VA) care and prompting concerns about the sustainability and cost-effectiveness of this care model for the VA. This study seeks to explore veterans' attitudes toward ridesharing services as a means of accessing VA-based cardiovascular care. This cross-sectional, quality improvement study utilized a 7-question survey administered to patients in an urban VA Heart Center to assess transportation preferences and opinions on ridesharing. Participants were more likely to support ridesharing if they held a positive opinion of rideshare ( P = 0.024), felt safe utilizing rideshare ( P = 0.025), or were undergoing invasive procedures ( P = 0.007). Distance traveled did not influence support of ridesharing ( P = 0.617). In conclusion, investing in ridesharing for veterans may provide a cost-effective means to improve VA access and continuity of care regardless of distance.</p>","PeriodicalId":101338,"journal":{"name":"American journal of medical quality : the official journal of the American College of Medical Quality","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141560680","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Enhancing Sepsis Outcomes: A 7-Year Multidisciplinary Endeavor. 提高败血症疗效:为期 7 年的多学科努力。
Pub Date : 2024-07-01 Epub Date: 2024-07-26 DOI: 10.1097/JMQ.0000000000000194
Robin Paudel, Sarah Lessard, Camilla Jaekel, Pamela Albrecht, Amir Masoud Forati, Chris Heiderscheit

Regulatory bodies in the United States have implemented quality metrics aimed at improving outcomes for patients with severe sepsis and septic shock. The current study was a quality improvement (QI) project in a community-based academic center aimed at improving adherence to sepsis quality metrics, time to antibiotic administration, and patient outcomes. Electronic health record systems were utilized to capture sepsis-related data. Regular audits and feedback sessions were conducted to identify areas for improvement, with a focus on the timely administration of antibiotics. Interventions included improving access to antibiotics, transitioning from intravenous piggyback to intravenous push formulations, and providing continuous staff education and training. This multidisciplinary QI initiative led to significant improvements in the mortality index, length of stay index, and direct cost index for patients with sepsis. Targeted multidisciplinary QI interventions resulted in improved quality metrics and patient outcomes.

美国的监管机构已经实施了质量标准,旨在改善严重脓毒症和脓毒性休克患者的治疗效果。本研究是在一个社区学术中心开展的质量改进(QI)项目,旨在改善脓毒症质量指标的遵守情况、抗生素给药时间和患者预后。该项目利用电子健康记录系统采集脓毒症相关数据。通过定期审核和反馈会议来确定需要改进的地方,重点是抗生素的及时使用。干预措施包括改善抗生素的获取途径、从静脉回输过渡到静脉推注制剂,以及提供持续的员工教育和培训。这项多学科 QI 计划显著改善了败血症患者的死亡率指数、住院时间指数和直接成本指数。有针对性的多学科 QI 干预措施改善了质量指标和患者疗效。
{"title":"Enhancing Sepsis Outcomes: A 7-Year Multidisciplinary Endeavor.","authors":"Robin Paudel, Sarah Lessard, Camilla Jaekel, Pamela Albrecht, Amir Masoud Forati, Chris Heiderscheit","doi":"10.1097/JMQ.0000000000000194","DOIUrl":"10.1097/JMQ.0000000000000194","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Regulatory bodies in the United States have implemented quality metrics aimed at improving outcomes for patients with severe sepsis and septic shock. The current study was a quality improvement (QI) project in a community-based academic center aimed at improving adherence to sepsis quality metrics, time to antibiotic administration, and patient outcomes. Electronic health record systems were utilized to capture sepsis-related data. Regular audits and feedback sessions were conducted to identify areas for improvement, with a focus on the timely administration of antibiotics. Interventions included improving access to antibiotics, transitioning from intravenous piggyback to intravenous push formulations, and providing continuous staff education and training. This multidisciplinary QI initiative led to significant improvements in the mortality index, length of stay index, and direct cost index for patients with sepsis. Targeted multidisciplinary QI interventions resulted in improved quality metrics and patient outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":101338,"journal":{"name":"American journal of medical quality : the official journal of the American College of Medical Quality","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141750165","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Patient Surveys Are Used Most Often to Assess Health Care Innovations, Rigorous Methods Are Less Common. 患者调查最常用于评估医疗创新,严谨的方法则较少见。
Pub Date : 2024-07-01 Epub Date: 2024-07-08 DOI: 10.1097/JMQ.0000000000000197
Nabeel Qureshi, Denise D Quigley

The Agency of Healthcare Research and Quality Healthcare Innovations Exchange (IE) was developed to collect and report on innovative approaches to improving health care. The team reviewed 348 IE innovations including patient-reported satisfaction or experience measures. Innovations most often measured overall rating of care (61% of innovations), followed by access (52%) and provider-patient communication (12%). More than half used patient satisfaction surveys (n = 187) rather than patient experience surveys (n = 64). Innovations using patient experience surveys more often measured specific aspects of patient care, for example, access, versus a general overall rating of care. Most innovations using patient experience surveys administered nonvalidated, homegrown surveys, with few using the Agency of Healthcare Research and Quality-endorsed, psychometrically-tested CAHPS (Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems) survey. The most common study design was postimplementation-only (65%), highlighting that methodological rigor used to assess patient-centeredness in the IE is low. Broad use of patient experience surveys and more rigorous evaluation study designs has increased some over time but is still lacking.

医疗保健研究与质量机构医疗保健创新交流(IE)旨在收集和报告改善医疗保健的创新方法。研究小组审查了 348 项 IE 创新,其中包括患者报告的满意度或体验措施。创新最常衡量的是医疗服务的总体评价(61% 的创新),其次是就医途径(52%)和医疗服务提供者与患者之间的沟通(12%)。半数以上采用患者满意度调查(187 人),而非患者体验调查(64 人)。使用患者体验调查的创新项目更多是衡量患者护理的具体方面,例如就医机会,而不是对护理的总体评价。大多数使用患者体验调查的创新项目都采用了未经验证的自制调查表,只有少数项目采用了医疗保健研究与质量机构认可的、经过心理测试的 CAHPS(医疗保健提供者与系统消费者评估)调查表。最常见的研究设计是仅在实施后进行的(65%),这凸显出用于评估 IE 中以患者为中心的方法的严谨性较低。随着时间的推移,广泛使用患者体验调查和更严格的评估研究设计的情况有所增多,但仍然缺乏。
{"title":"Patient Surveys Are Used Most Often to Assess Health Care Innovations, Rigorous Methods Are Less Common.","authors":"Nabeel Qureshi, Denise D Quigley","doi":"10.1097/JMQ.0000000000000197","DOIUrl":"10.1097/JMQ.0000000000000197","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The Agency of Healthcare Research and Quality Healthcare Innovations Exchange (IE) was developed to collect and report on innovative approaches to improving health care. The team reviewed 348 IE innovations including patient-reported satisfaction or experience measures. Innovations most often measured overall rating of care (61% of innovations), followed by access (52%) and provider-patient communication (12%). More than half used patient satisfaction surveys (n = 187) rather than patient experience surveys (n = 64). Innovations using patient experience surveys more often measured specific aspects of patient care, for example, access, versus a general overall rating of care. Most innovations using patient experience surveys administered nonvalidated, homegrown surveys, with few using the Agency of Healthcare Research and Quality-endorsed, psychometrically-tested CAHPS (Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems) survey. The most common study design was postimplementation-only (65%), highlighting that methodological rigor used to assess patient-centeredness in the IE is low. Broad use of patient experience surveys and more rigorous evaluation study designs has increased some over time but is still lacking.</p>","PeriodicalId":101338,"journal":{"name":"American journal of medical quality : the official journal of the American College of Medical Quality","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11269007/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141560679","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Optimizing Utilization of SGLT2 Inhibitors in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus and Chronic Kidney Disease in a VA Primary Care Clinic: An Interdisciplinary Quality Improvement Project. 退伍军人事务部初级保健诊所优化 2 型糖尿病和慢性肾病患者对 SGLT2 抑制剂的使用:跨学科质量改进项目。
Pub Date : 2024-07-01 Epub Date: 2024-07-26 DOI: 10.1097/JMQ.0000000000000188
Solanus de la Serna, Sruti Prathivadhi-Bhayankaram, Rachel Anderson, Arya Zandvakili, Jonathan Day, Mackenzie Hines, Naomi Vather-Wu, Joseph Salomone, Marcia Zeithamel, Meaghan Meyer, Leslie Brettell, Krista Johnson, Samuel Zetumer, Derek Hupp
{"title":"Optimizing Utilization of SGLT2 Inhibitors in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus and Chronic Kidney Disease in a VA Primary Care Clinic: An Interdisciplinary Quality Improvement Project.","authors":"Solanus de la Serna, Sruti Prathivadhi-Bhayankaram, Rachel Anderson, Arya Zandvakili, Jonathan Day, Mackenzie Hines, Naomi Vather-Wu, Joseph Salomone, Marcia Zeithamel, Meaghan Meyer, Leslie Brettell, Krista Johnson, Samuel Zetumer, Derek Hupp","doi":"10.1097/JMQ.0000000000000188","DOIUrl":"10.1097/JMQ.0000000000000188","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":101338,"journal":{"name":"American journal of medical quality : the official journal of the American College of Medical Quality","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141763938","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
"Near Miss": A Mixed-Methods Analysis of Medical Student Assignments in Patient Safety. "险些失手":医学生病人安全作业的混合方法分析》。
Pub Date : 2024-07-01 Epub Date: 2024-07-12 DOI: 10.1097/JMQ.0000000000000196
Thomas Plugge, Amanda Breviu, Katie Lappé, Mariah Sakaeda, Sonja Raaum

The purpose of this study is to inform the curriculum for Entrustable Professional Activity 13 through analysis of fourth year medical student patient safety event assignments. From 2016 to 2021, students were asked to identify a patient safety event and indicate if the event required an incident report. Assignments were reviewed and coded based on Joint Commission incident definitions. Qualitative analysis was performed to evaluate incident report justification. There were 473 student assignments included in the analysis. Assignments reported incidents regarding communication, medical judgment, medication errors, and coordination of care. Students indicated only 18.0% (85/473) would warrant an incident report. Justification for not filing an incident report included lack of harm to the patient or that it was previously reported. Students were able to identify system issues but infrequently felt an incident report was required. Justifications for not filing an incident report suggest a need for a curriculum focused on the value of reporting near misses and hazardous conditions.

本研究旨在通过分析四年级医学生的患者安全事件作业,为第 13 项 "可委托专业活动 "的课程提供信息。从 2016 年到 2021 年,学生们被要求确定一个患者安全事件,并指出该事件是否需要事故报告。根据联合委员会的事件定义对作业进行审查和编码。进行定性分析以评估事故报告的合理性。共有 473 份学生作业被纳入分析范围。作业报告的事件涉及沟通、医疗判断、用药错误和护理协调。学生们表示,只有 18.0%(85/473)的事故需要提交事故报告。不提交事故报告的理由包括未对患者造成伤害或之前已报告过。学生们能够发现系统问题,但很少认为需要提交事故报告。不提交事故报告的理由表明,有必要开设以报告险情和危险状况的价值为重点的课程。
{"title":"\"Near Miss\": A Mixed-Methods Analysis of Medical Student Assignments in Patient Safety.","authors":"Thomas Plugge, Amanda Breviu, Katie Lappé, Mariah Sakaeda, Sonja Raaum","doi":"10.1097/JMQ.0000000000000196","DOIUrl":"10.1097/JMQ.0000000000000196","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The purpose of this study is to inform the curriculum for Entrustable Professional Activity 13 through analysis of fourth year medical student patient safety event assignments. From 2016 to 2021, students were asked to identify a patient safety event and indicate if the event required an incident report. Assignments were reviewed and coded based on Joint Commission incident definitions. Qualitative analysis was performed to evaluate incident report justification. There were 473 student assignments included in the analysis. Assignments reported incidents regarding communication, medical judgment, medication errors, and coordination of care. Students indicated only 18.0% (85/473) would warrant an incident report. Justification for not filing an incident report included lack of harm to the patient or that it was previously reported. Students were able to identify system issues but infrequently felt an incident report was required. Justifications for not filing an incident report suggest a need for a curriculum focused on the value of reporting near misses and hazardous conditions.</p>","PeriodicalId":101338,"journal":{"name":"American journal of medical quality : the official journal of the American College of Medical Quality","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141592557","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Improving Inpatient Colonoscopy Bowel Preparation: A Successful Quality Improvement Project. 改善住院病人结肠镜检查肠道准备:一个成功的质量改进项目。
Pub Date : 2024-07-01 Epub Date: 2024-05-30 DOI: 10.1097/JMQ.0000000000000189
Sofi Damjanovska, Shota Watanabe, Daniel B Karb, Michael Kurin, Gerard Isenberg

Inadequate inpatient bowel preparation can lead to repeat procedures, prolonged hospital stays, and increased financial burden. In this quality improvement project, the authors developed an electronic medical record (EMR)-based order set with precise instructions and anticipatory guidance for inpatient bowel preparation before colonoscopy. The current study is a nonrandomized intervention study. The authors compared 2 groups: an intervention group using a newly developed, consensus-based, standardized EMR bowel preparation order set and a control group using previously existing EMR bowel preparation orders. Bowel preparation outcomes were followed over the course of 16 months. The aim was to improve inpatient colonoscopy bowel preparation, as evaluated by the Boston Bowel Preparation Scale, procedure delays, and length of hospital stay. We additionally evaluated the groups' demographics and patient-level factors. A total of 459 inpatient colonoscopies were evaluated over a 16-month period. The intervention group consisted of 227 inpatient colonoscopies, while the control group consisted of 232. The intervention group showed superior Boston Bowel Preparation Scale score and decreased length of hospital stay. The number of adequate bowel preparations increased in the intervention group when compared to the control group from 77% to 86%. The creation of an EMR-based order set is a low-cost and sustainable action that can be easily implemented throughout a hospital system.

住院病人肠道准备不充分会导致重复手术、住院时间延长和经济负担加重。在这一质量改进项目中,作者开发了一套基于电子病历 (EMR) 的医嘱,其中包含结肠镜检查前住院患者肠道准备的精确说明和预期指导。本研究是一项非随机干预研究。作者对两组进行了比较:一组是使用新开发的、基于共识的标准化 EMR 肠道准备医嘱集的干预组,另一组是使用以前存在的 EMR 肠道准备医嘱的对照组。对肠道准备结果进行了长达 16 个月的跟踪调查。我们的目标是改善住院患者结肠镜检查肠道准备工作(根据波士顿肠道准备量表进行评估)、手术延迟和住院时间。此外,我们还评估了各组的人口统计学和患者水平因素。在 16 个月的时间里,共对 459 例住院结肠镜检查进行了评估。干预组进行了 227 次住院结肠镜检查,对照组进行了 232 次。干预组的波士顿肠道准备量表得分更高,住院时间更短。与对照组相比,干预组充分肠道准备的次数从 77% 增加到 86%。创建基于电子病历的医嘱集是一项低成本、可持续的行动,可在整个医院系统中轻松实施。
{"title":"Improving Inpatient Colonoscopy Bowel Preparation: A Successful Quality Improvement Project.","authors":"Sofi Damjanovska, Shota Watanabe, Daniel B Karb, Michael Kurin, Gerard Isenberg","doi":"10.1097/JMQ.0000000000000189","DOIUrl":"10.1097/JMQ.0000000000000189","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Inadequate inpatient bowel preparation can lead to repeat procedures, prolonged hospital stays, and increased financial burden. In this quality improvement project, the authors developed an electronic medical record (EMR)-based order set with precise instructions and anticipatory guidance for inpatient bowel preparation before colonoscopy. The current study is a nonrandomized intervention study. The authors compared 2 groups: an intervention group using a newly developed, consensus-based, standardized EMR bowel preparation order set and a control group using previously existing EMR bowel preparation orders. Bowel preparation outcomes were followed over the course of 16 months. The aim was to improve inpatient colonoscopy bowel preparation, as evaluated by the Boston Bowel Preparation Scale, procedure delays, and length of hospital stay. We additionally evaluated the groups' demographics and patient-level factors. A total of 459 inpatient colonoscopies were evaluated over a 16-month period. The intervention group consisted of 227 inpatient colonoscopies, while the control group consisted of 232. The intervention group showed superior Boston Bowel Preparation Scale score and decreased length of hospital stay. The number of adequate bowel preparations increased in the intervention group when compared to the control group from 77% to 86%. The creation of an EMR-based order set is a low-cost and sustainable action that can be easily implemented throughout a hospital system.</p>","PeriodicalId":101338,"journal":{"name":"American journal of medical quality : the official journal of the American College of Medical Quality","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141422404","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Implementation of Quality Improvement System in a National Health System. 在国家卫生系统中实施质量改进系统。
Pub Date : 2024-07-01 Epub Date: 2024-07-12 DOI: 10.1097/JMQ.0000000000000195
Bradley V Watts, Kay Calloway

There is a continued need to improve the quality of health care services and the health outcomes associated with that care. Quality improvement model and the Learning Health System framework have emerged as potential methods to achieve the goals of better care and enhanced outcomes. Few practical tools and approaches have been developed to assist with the initiation of quality improvement and development of a Learning Health System. The Department of Veterans Affairs developed and deployed a national system to assist and organize improvement projects and serve as a database for learning. During its first 5 years of use, 7397 quality improvement projects were completed using the electronic tool. National implementation of a structured tool for quality improvement is possible.

我们一直需要提高医疗服务的质量以及与医疗服务相关的健康成果。质量改进模式和学习型医疗系统框架已成为实现改善医疗服务和提高医疗效果目标的潜在方法。目前还没有开发出什么实用的工具和方法来帮助启动质量改进和发展学习型医疗系统。退伍军人事务部开发并部署了一个全国系统,以协助和组织改进项目,并作为学习数据库。在使用该电子工具的头 5 年中,共完成了 7397 个质量改进项目。在全国范围内实施结构化的质量改进工具是可能的。
{"title":"Implementation of Quality Improvement System in a National Health System.","authors":"Bradley V Watts, Kay Calloway","doi":"10.1097/JMQ.0000000000000195","DOIUrl":"10.1097/JMQ.0000000000000195","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>There is a continued need to improve the quality of health care services and the health outcomes associated with that care. Quality improvement model and the Learning Health System framework have emerged as potential methods to achieve the goals of better care and enhanced outcomes. Few practical tools and approaches have been developed to assist with the initiation of quality improvement and development of a Learning Health System. The Department of Veterans Affairs developed and deployed a national system to assist and organize improvement projects and serve as a database for learning. During its first 5 years of use, 7397 quality improvement projects were completed using the electronic tool. National implementation of a structured tool for quality improvement is possible.</p>","PeriodicalId":101338,"journal":{"name":"American journal of medical quality : the official journal of the American College of Medical Quality","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141592558","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
期刊
American journal of medical quality : the official journal of the American College of Medical Quality
全部 Acc. Chem. Res. ACS Applied Bio Materials ACS Appl. Electron. Mater. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces ACS Appl. Nano Mater. ACS Appl. Polym. Mater. ACS BIOMATER-SCI ENG ACS Catal. ACS Cent. Sci. ACS Chem. Biol. ACS Chemical Health & Safety ACS Chem. Neurosci. ACS Comb. Sci. ACS Earth Space Chem. ACS Energy Lett. ACS Infect. Dis. ACS Macro Lett. ACS Mater. Lett. ACS Med. Chem. Lett. ACS Nano ACS Omega ACS Photonics ACS Sens. ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. ACS Synth. Biol. Anal. Chem. BIOCHEMISTRY-US Bioconjugate Chem. BIOMACROMOLECULES Chem. Res. Toxicol. Chem. Rev. Chem. Mater. CRYST GROWTH DES ENERG FUEL Environ. Sci. Technol. Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. IND ENG CHEM RES Inorg. Chem. J. Agric. Food. Chem. J. Chem. Eng. Data J. Chem. Educ. J. Chem. Inf. Model. J. Chem. Theory Comput. J. Med. Chem. J. Nat. Prod. J PROTEOME RES J. Am. Chem. Soc. LANGMUIR MACROMOLECULES Mol. Pharmaceutics Nano Lett. Org. Lett. ORG PROCESS RES DEV ORGANOMETALLICS J. Org. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. A J. Phys. Chem. B J. Phys. Chem. C J. Phys. Chem. Lett. Analyst Anal. Methods Biomater. Sci. Catal. Sci. Technol. Chem. Commun. Chem. Soc. Rev. CHEM EDUC RES PRACT CRYSTENGCOMM Dalton Trans. Energy Environ. Sci. ENVIRON SCI-NANO ENVIRON SCI-PROC IMP ENVIRON SCI-WAT RES Faraday Discuss. Food Funct. Green Chem. Inorg. Chem. Front. Integr. Biol. J. Anal. At. Spectrom. J. Mater. Chem. A J. Mater. Chem. B J. Mater. Chem. C Lab Chip Mater. Chem. Front. Mater. Horiz. MEDCHEMCOMM Metallomics Mol. Biosyst. Mol. Syst. Des. Eng. Nanoscale Nanoscale Horiz. Nat. Prod. Rep. New J. Chem. Org. Biomol. Chem. Org. Chem. Front. PHOTOCH PHOTOBIO SCI PCCP Polym. Chem.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1