Standardization of facial electromyographic responses

IF 2.7 3区 医学 Q1 BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES Biological Psychology Pub Date : 2024-01-01 DOI:10.1016/j.biopsycho.2023.108737
Anton van Boxtel , Jolien van der Graaff
{"title":"Standardization of facial electromyographic responses","authors":"Anton van Boxtel ,&nbsp;Jolien van der Graaff","doi":"10.1016/j.biopsycho.2023.108737","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>In behavioral studies, facial electromyographic (EMG) responses to external stimuli or internal events are usually quantified relative to the resting state, presumed to represent a neutral baseline condition. In the large majority of recent studies, EMG responses were expressed as a difference score in terms of microvolts with the resting state. We argue that since EMG activity is measured on a ratio scale rather than on an interval scale, percentage scores should be used instead of difference scores. Reanalyzing results from an earlier study on the relationships between facial EMG responses and affective empathic responses to emotional video clips, we found that the two different types of EMG response quantification were differently related to affective empathy. Relationships between EMG responses and affective empathy were more consistent or stronger for percentage scores than for difference scores. In another study, facial EMG mimicry responses to pictures of emotional facial expressions were stronger for percentage scores than for difference scores. The adequacy of percentage scores relative to difference scores as indices of psychological variables may be simply checked by comparing both types of scores</p></div>","PeriodicalId":55372,"journal":{"name":"Biological Psychology","volume":"185 ","pages":"Article 108737"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Biological Psychology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0301051123002570","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In behavioral studies, facial electromyographic (EMG) responses to external stimuli or internal events are usually quantified relative to the resting state, presumed to represent a neutral baseline condition. In the large majority of recent studies, EMG responses were expressed as a difference score in terms of microvolts with the resting state. We argue that since EMG activity is measured on a ratio scale rather than on an interval scale, percentage scores should be used instead of difference scores. Reanalyzing results from an earlier study on the relationships between facial EMG responses and affective empathic responses to emotional video clips, we found that the two different types of EMG response quantification were differently related to affective empathy. Relationships between EMG responses and affective empathy were more consistent or stronger for percentage scores than for difference scores. In another study, facial EMG mimicry responses to pictures of emotional facial expressions were stronger for percentage scores than for difference scores. The adequacy of percentage scores relative to difference scores as indices of psychological variables may be simply checked by comparing both types of scores

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
面部肌电反应标准化。
在行为研究中,面部肌电图(EMG)对外部刺激或内部事件的反应通常是相对于静息状态(假定代表中性基线状态)进行量化的。在最近的大多数研究中,EMG 反应都是以与静息状态的微伏差值来表示的。我们认为,由于肌电图活动是以比率而非间隔尺度测量的,因此应使用百分比分数而非差值分数。我们重新分析了早先一项关于面部肌电图反应与情绪视频剪辑的情感共鸣反应之间关系的研究结果,发现两种不同类型的肌电图反应量化与情感共鸣的关系不同。百分比得分与差值得分相比,EMG 反应与情感共鸣之间的关系更为一致或更强。在另一项研究中,对情绪面部表情图片的面部 EMG 模仿反应,百分比得分比差异得分更强。百分比得分相对于差值得分是否足以作为心理变量的指标,可以通过比较这两种得分进行简单的检验。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Biological Psychology
Biological Psychology 医学-行为科学
CiteScore
4.20
自引率
11.50%
发文量
146
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: Biological Psychology publishes original scientific papers on the biological aspects of psychological states and processes. Biological aspects include electrophysiology and biochemical assessments during psychological experiments as well as biologically induced changes in psychological function. Psychological investigations based on biological theories are also of interest. All aspects of psychological functioning, including psychopathology, are germane. The Journal concentrates on work with human subjects, but may consider work with animal subjects if conceptually related to issues in human biological psychology.
期刊最新文献
WACARDIA: graphical MATLAB software for Wireless Assessment of CARDiac Interoceptive Accuracy. Expectation to rewards modulates learning emotional words: Evidence from a hierarchical Bayesian model Multimodal neuroimaging of hierarchical cognitive control Face emojis vs. Non-face emojis: Exploring neural mechanisms in text processing Multiple risk markers for increases in depression symptoms across two years: Evidence from the reward positivity and the error-related negativity
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1