University Students' Knowledge and Attitudes about Plagiarism: A Web-Based Cross-Sectional Study

H. Upadhyay, B. Pradhan, Prativa Sedain
{"title":"University Students' Knowledge and Attitudes about Plagiarism: A Web-Based Cross-Sectional Study","authors":"H. Upadhyay, B. Pradhan, Prativa Sedain","doi":"10.3126/bmcjsr.v6i1.60956","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Plagiarism is the act of using someone else's ideas, words, or work without giving them proper credit and presenting it as your own. It is considered a serious ethical and academic offense in most educational institutions and professional settings. The main objective of this research was to find the level of knowledge and attitudes about plagiarism among university level students and various associated factors affecting for level of knowledge and attitudes.\nAn analytical cross-sectional study was conducted among 288 universities level students using non probability sampling. Collected information was checked for completeness and coded with serial number and then analyzed using SPSS-22. Descriptive and inferential statistical tools were used for data analysis. In the descriptive statistics frequency and percentage were calculated for the categorical variable while mean and SD were calculated for continuous variables. In the inferential statistics to find the association between level of knowledge and attitude Chi-Square test were used. p-value <0.05 was considered as statistically significant.\nThe mean±SD of age was 24.4±3.15 years. This study revealed that 68.4% students know the meaning of plagiarism. Also, 46.2 % students had good (with 95% CI 40.44%-51.95%). Likewise, 51% students had positive attitude level of attitude (with 95% CI 45.22 %-56.77%). Academic year, level of education, type of university was found to be statistically significant with outcome variable (knowledge and attitude) (p-value<0.05).\nMore than half of university students were still unaware of the concept condition as well as of type, its significance, consequences and remedies for plagiarism. So, the academic community of concerned authorities needs to pay close attention, not just as a breach of ethics and regulations, in order to create a harmonious academic environment.","PeriodicalId":404599,"journal":{"name":"BMC Journal of Scientific Research","volume":"83 22","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Journal of Scientific Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3126/bmcjsr.v6i1.60956","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Plagiarism is the act of using someone else's ideas, words, or work without giving them proper credit and presenting it as your own. It is considered a serious ethical and academic offense in most educational institutions and professional settings. The main objective of this research was to find the level of knowledge and attitudes about plagiarism among university level students and various associated factors affecting for level of knowledge and attitudes. An analytical cross-sectional study was conducted among 288 universities level students using non probability sampling. Collected information was checked for completeness and coded with serial number and then analyzed using SPSS-22. Descriptive and inferential statistical tools were used for data analysis. In the descriptive statistics frequency and percentage were calculated for the categorical variable while mean and SD were calculated for continuous variables. In the inferential statistics to find the association between level of knowledge and attitude Chi-Square test were used. p-value <0.05 was considered as statistically significant. The mean±SD of age was 24.4±3.15 years. This study revealed that 68.4% students know the meaning of plagiarism. Also, 46.2 % students had good (with 95% CI 40.44%-51.95%). Likewise, 51% students had positive attitude level of attitude (with 95% CI 45.22 %-56.77%). Academic year, level of education, type of university was found to be statistically significant with outcome variable (knowledge and attitude) (p-value<0.05). More than half of university students were still unaware of the concept condition as well as of type, its significance, consequences and remedies for plagiarism. So, the academic community of concerned authorities needs to pay close attention, not just as a breach of ethics and regulations, in order to create a harmonious academic environment.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
大学生对剽窃行为的认识和态度:基于网络的横断面研究
剽窃是指使用他人的观点、文字或作品而不给予适当的荣誉,并将其作为自己的观点、文字或作品的行为。在大多数教育机构和专业环境中,剽窃被认为是一种严重的道德和学术违法行为。本研究的主要目的是了解大学生对剽窃行为的认识水平和态度,以及影响其认识水平和态度的各种相关因素。研究采用非概率抽样方法,对 288 名大学生进行了分析性横断面研究,对收集到的信息进行了完整性检查,并用序列号进行了编码,然后使用 SPSS-22 进行了分析。数据分析使用了描述性和推论性统计工具。在描述性统计中,对分类变量计算频率和百分比,对连续变量计算平均值和 SD 值。在推断统计中,使用了 Chi-Square 检验来发现知识水平和态度之间的关联,P 值小于 0.05 被认为具有统计学意义。研究显示,68.4% 的学生知道抄袭的含义。此外,46.2%的学生有良好的抄袭行为(95% CI 为 40.44%-51.95%)。同样,51% 的学生态度积极(95% CI 为 45.22%-56.77%)。调查发现,学年、受教育程度、大学类型与结果变量(知识和态度)有统计学意义(P 值<0.05)。一半以上的大学生仍不了解抄袭的概念条件、类型、意义、后果和补救措施。因此,学术界有关部门需要密切关注,不能仅仅将其视为违反道德和法规的行为,以营造和谐的学术环境。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Ethnobotanical and Phytochemical Study of Houttuynia cordata Thunb: A Review Study of Fiber Yielding Plants of Devchuli Municipality Ward no.13, Nawalparasi Impact of Intellectual Capital on Firms’ Performance: With Perspective of Commercial Banks in Chitwan ‘परमानन्द’ महाकाव्यमा छन्दविधान University Students' Knowledge and Attitudes about Plagiarism: A Web-Based Cross-Sectional Study
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1