Adherence to the EAT-Lancet diet and its relation with food insecurity and income in a Brazilian population-based sample

Mariana Alves Ferreira, Alexsandro Macedo Silva, D. Marchioni, Eduardo De Carli
{"title":"Adherence to the EAT-Lancet diet and its relation with food insecurity and income in a Brazilian population-based sample","authors":"Mariana Alves Ferreira, Alexsandro Macedo Silva, D. Marchioni, Eduardo De Carli","doi":"10.1590/0102-311XEN247222","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract: This study aimed to investigate the relation of adherence to the planetary diet with food and nutrition security status and per capita household income in a study with a representative sample of the Brazilian population. Among the data from the 2017-2018 Brazilian Household Budgets Survey (POF), the inequality indicators selected for the analysis were data on per capita household income and food and nutrition security. We also considered data on the individual food consumption of 46,164 Brazilians aged ≥ 10 years, obtained through 24-hour dietary recalls, in the National Food Survey, conducted with the POF 2017-2018. The Planetary Health Diet Index (PHDI) was used to measure adherence to the planetary diet. Sociodemographic data were expressed as frequency (%), with analysis of the mean and 95% confidence interval (95%CI) of the PHDI score. The relation of food and nutrition security and income with the PHDI score was tested in multiple linear regression models. The calculations were performed in the Stata software, adopting a 5% significance. Lower PHDI means were observed among food insecure individuals, male, < 20 years old, mixed-race and indigenous, with income < 0.5 minimum wage, residing in rural areas and in the North and Northeast regions. In the multiple linear regression, food insecurity was inversely related to PHDI score (ꞵ = -0.56; 95%CI: -1.06; -0.06), with the lowest scores associated with severe food insecurity (β = -1.31; 95%CI: -2.19; -0.55). Income categories were not independently associated to PHDI score (p-trend = 0.900). Therefore, food insecurity has been shown to negatively affect Brazilians’ adherence to the planetary diet.","PeriodicalId":122102,"journal":{"name":"Cadernos de Saúde Pública","volume":"32 35","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cadernos de Saúde Pública","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1590/0102-311XEN247222","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract: This study aimed to investigate the relation of adherence to the planetary diet with food and nutrition security status and per capita household income in a study with a representative sample of the Brazilian population. Among the data from the 2017-2018 Brazilian Household Budgets Survey (POF), the inequality indicators selected for the analysis were data on per capita household income and food and nutrition security. We also considered data on the individual food consumption of 46,164 Brazilians aged ≥ 10 years, obtained through 24-hour dietary recalls, in the National Food Survey, conducted with the POF 2017-2018. The Planetary Health Diet Index (PHDI) was used to measure adherence to the planetary diet. Sociodemographic data were expressed as frequency (%), with analysis of the mean and 95% confidence interval (95%CI) of the PHDI score. The relation of food and nutrition security and income with the PHDI score was tested in multiple linear regression models. The calculations were performed in the Stata software, adopting a 5% significance. Lower PHDI means were observed among food insecure individuals, male, < 20 years old, mixed-race and indigenous, with income < 0.5 minimum wage, residing in rural areas and in the North and Northeast regions. In the multiple linear regression, food insecurity was inversely related to PHDI score (ꞵ = -0.56; 95%CI: -1.06; -0.06), with the lowest scores associated with severe food insecurity (β = -1.31; 95%CI: -2.19; -0.55). Income categories were not independently associated to PHDI score (p-trend = 0.900). Therefore, food insecurity has been shown to negatively affect Brazilians’ adherence to the planetary diet.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
巴西人口样本中的 EAT-Lancet 饮食坚持情况及其与粮食不安全和收入的关系
摘要:本研究旨在通过一项具有代表性的巴西人口样本研究,调查坚持行星饮食与粮食和营养安全状况以及人均家庭收入之间的关系。在 2017-2018 年巴西家庭预算调查(POF)的数据中,我们选择了家庭人均收入和食品与营养安全数据作为不平等指标进行分析。我们还考虑了与 2017-2018 年 POF 一起进行的全国食品调查中通过 24 小时饮食回忆获得的 46 164 名年龄≥ 10 岁的巴西人的个人食品消费数据。行星健康饮食指数(PHDI)用于衡量行星饮食的坚持情况。社会人口学数据以频率(%)表示,并对 PHDI 分数的平均值和 95% 置信区间(95%CI)进行分析。食物和营养安全以及收入与 PHDI 分数的关系通过多元线性回归模型进行检验。计算在 Stata 软件中进行,采用 5%的显著性。据观察,男性、年龄小于 20 岁、混血儿和土著人、收入小于 0.5 最低工资、居住在农村地区以及北部和东北部地区的食物无保障者的 PHDI 平均值较低。在多元线性回归中,粮食不安全与 PHDI 分数成反比(ꞵ = -0.56;95%CI:-1.06;-0.06),最低分数与严重粮食不安全相关(β =-1.31;95%CI:-2.19;-0.55)。收入类别与 PHDI 分数没有独立关联(P-趋势 = 0.900)。因此,粮食不安全已被证明会对巴西人遵守地球膳食产生负面影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Physical activity, anxiety, depression, and coping in Turkish men and women during the first wave of COVID-19 Presidential election results in 2018-2022 and its association with excess mortality during the 2020-2021 COVID-19 pandemic in Brazilian municipalities Food insecurity in Brazil by household arrangements and characteristics between 2004 and 2022 Association between job lost and mental health outcomes during the COVID-19 pandemic and the role of food insecurity as mediator of this relationship O papel mediador da dependência de mídia social e da qualidade do sono na associação entre tempo de uso de mídia social e sintomas depressivos em universitários
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1