Acceptability and feasibility of an intervention for Alaska Native and American Indian couples

IF 1.7 3区 社会学 Q2 FAMILY STUDIES Family Relations Pub Date : 2023-12-21 DOI:10.1111/fare.12986
Jaedon P. Avey, Kyle Wark, Polly Andrews, James Donadio, Thomas Bradbury, Bobbi Outten
{"title":"Acceptability and feasibility of an intervention for Alaska Native and American Indian couples","authors":"Jaedon P. Avey,&nbsp;Kyle Wark,&nbsp;Polly Andrews,&nbsp;James Donadio,&nbsp;Thomas Bradbury,&nbsp;Bobbi Outten","doi":"10.1111/fare.12986","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Objective</h3>\n \n <p>This acceptability and feasibility study assessed a previously tested movie discussion intervention culturally adapted for a tribal health setting.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background</h3>\n \n <p>Despite family and relationships being important in Alaska Native and American Indian (ANAI) cultures, social health interventions supporting committed ANAI couples have not been investigated. Couples watching and discussing movies can promote and sustain relationship health as effectively as intensive skill-building classes.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Method</h3>\n \n <p>This study culturally adapted a movie discussion intervention. Multiple stakeholders guided adaptations, including changes to intervention duration, recommended movies, discussion guide, and study measures. Eligible participants were cohabitating adults in a committed relationship, with at least one person in the couple being ANAI. Participants watched and discussed movies over 4 weeks at home or in person. Study measures assessed demographics, relationship characteristics, and intervention acceptability and feasibility.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>Twenty-three couples participated: 87% chose at-home participation, 70% completed the intervention. Almost 90% of couples felt comfortable discussing the movies, felt the discussion guide improved communication, and would recommend the intervention to other couples, but 26% were mildly stressed by the discussions.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\n \n <p>This intervention was a feasible and acceptable way to help ANAI couples maintain positive relationship features.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Implications</h3>\n \n <p>This intervention could support ANAI couples in regions with limited access to behavioral health services.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":48206,"journal":{"name":"Family Relations","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Family Relations","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/fare.12986","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"FAMILY STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective

This acceptability and feasibility study assessed a previously tested movie discussion intervention culturally adapted for a tribal health setting.

Background

Despite family and relationships being important in Alaska Native and American Indian (ANAI) cultures, social health interventions supporting committed ANAI couples have not been investigated. Couples watching and discussing movies can promote and sustain relationship health as effectively as intensive skill-building classes.

Method

This study culturally adapted a movie discussion intervention. Multiple stakeholders guided adaptations, including changes to intervention duration, recommended movies, discussion guide, and study measures. Eligible participants were cohabitating adults in a committed relationship, with at least one person in the couple being ANAI. Participants watched and discussed movies over 4 weeks at home or in person. Study measures assessed demographics, relationship characteristics, and intervention acceptability and feasibility.

Results

Twenty-three couples participated: 87% chose at-home participation, 70% completed the intervention. Almost 90% of couples felt comfortable discussing the movies, felt the discussion guide improved communication, and would recommend the intervention to other couples, but 26% were mildly stressed by the discussions.

Conclusion

This intervention was a feasible and acceptable way to help ANAI couples maintain positive relationship features.

Implications

This intervention could support ANAI couples in regions with limited access to behavioral health services.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
针对阿拉斯加原住民和美洲印第安人夫妇的干预措施的可接受性和可行性
尽管家庭和人际关系在阿拉斯加原住民和美洲印第安人(ANAI)文化中非常重要,但支持坚定的阿拉斯加原住民和美洲印第安人夫妇的社会健康干预措施尚未得到研究。本研究对电影讨论干预措施进行了文化调整。本研究对电影讨论干预进行了文化改编,多方利益相关者对改编进行了指导,包括对干预持续时间、推荐电影、讨论指南和研究措施的改动。符合条件的参与者都是同居的成年人,他们之间有着坚定的关系,并且夫妇中至少有一人是 ANAI。参与者在 4 周内在家或亲自观看并讨论电影。研究措施对人口统计学、关系特征、干预的可接受性和可行性进行了评估:23对夫妇参加了研究:87%选择在家参与,70%完成了干预。近 90% 的夫妇在讨论电影时感到自在,认为讨论指南改善了沟通,并会向其他夫妇推荐该干预措施,但有 26% 的夫妇在讨论中感到轻微压力。该干预措施是一种可行且可接受的方法,可帮助 ANAI 夫妇保持积极的关系特征。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Family Relations
Family Relations Multiple-
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
13.60%
发文量
164
期刊介绍: A premier, applied journal of family studies, Family Relations is mandatory reading for family scholars and all professionals who work with families, including: family practitioners, educators, marriage and family therapists, researchers, and social policy specialists. The journal"s content emphasizes family research with implications for intervention, education, and public policy, always publishing original, innovative and interdisciplinary works with specific recommendations for practice.
期刊最新文献
Issue Information Minority stress and relationship satisfaction in same‐sex couples: A meta‐analysis Family bonds at risk: The spillover effects of workplace ostracism in the parent–child relationship Partnering with Reach Out and Read to understand families' experiences with books and their babies Community members as design partners: Codesign workshops of the families tackling tough times together program
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1