Early Post-operative Outcomes of Single versus Multiple Arterial Grafts in Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting; A Comparative Analysis

Imtiaz Ahmed Chaudhry, Nasir Ali, Sidra Afzal, Imran Bashir
{"title":"Early Post-operative Outcomes of Single versus Multiple Arterial Grafts in Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting; A Comparative Analysis","authors":"Imtiaz Ahmed Chaudhry, Nasir Ali, Sidra Afzal, Imran Bashir","doi":"10.51253/pafmj.v73isuppl-3.10968","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective: To compare early post-operative outcomes of Single versus Multiple Arterial grafts in Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting (CABG) surgery.\nStudy Design: Analytical Cross-sectional study.\nPlace and Duration of Study: Adult Cardiac Surgery, Armed Forces Institute of Cardiology/National Institute of Heart Diseases Rawalpindi Pakistan, from Jul 2022 to May 2023.\nMethodology: One hundred and forty nine patients planned for elective isolated CABG (with two or more grafts) were enrolled in study using consecutive sampling. They were allocated into two groups, group A (Multiple Arterial CABG group) and group B (Conventional CABG group). Data was collected on early post-op outcomes i.e. ICU stay, ventilation time, inotropic duration, chest drainage, rhythm complications including Supraventricular Tachycardia (SVT) and mortality using a structured proforma. Chi-square and t-test were applied to make comparison between both groups. p<0.05 was considered statistically significant.\nResults: Out of one hundred and forty nine patients, who underwent elective CABG, majority were males 124(83.2%). Mean age of the patients was 59.18±9.28 years. Seventy four (49.7%) patients underwent Multiple Arterial CABG while 75(50.3%) had conventional CABG. Mean ICU stay duration was 56.74±48.30 hours in group A while it was 67.25±73.42 hours in group B; p=0.30. Mean Chest Drainage was 622.05±505.69 ml in group A while it was 846.13±799.67 ml in group B; p=0.04. Mean ventilation time was 10.28 ± 19.88 hours..................\nConclusion: The use of the Radial Artery (RA) in CABG surgery was associated with better early ...............","PeriodicalId":31059,"journal":{"name":"Pakistan Armed Forces Medical Journal","volume":"58 7","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pakistan Armed Forces Medical Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.51253/pafmj.v73isuppl-3.10968","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Health Professions","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To compare early post-operative outcomes of Single versus Multiple Arterial grafts in Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting (CABG) surgery. Study Design: Analytical Cross-sectional study. Place and Duration of Study: Adult Cardiac Surgery, Armed Forces Institute of Cardiology/National Institute of Heart Diseases Rawalpindi Pakistan, from Jul 2022 to May 2023. Methodology: One hundred and forty nine patients planned for elective isolated CABG (with two or more grafts) were enrolled in study using consecutive sampling. They were allocated into two groups, group A (Multiple Arterial CABG group) and group B (Conventional CABG group). Data was collected on early post-op outcomes i.e. ICU stay, ventilation time, inotropic duration, chest drainage, rhythm complications including Supraventricular Tachycardia (SVT) and mortality using a structured proforma. Chi-square and t-test were applied to make comparison between both groups. p<0.05 was considered statistically significant. Results: Out of one hundred and forty nine patients, who underwent elective CABG, majority were males 124(83.2%). Mean age of the patients was 59.18±9.28 years. Seventy four (49.7%) patients underwent Multiple Arterial CABG while 75(50.3%) had conventional CABG. Mean ICU stay duration was 56.74±48.30 hours in group A while it was 67.25±73.42 hours in group B; p=0.30. Mean Chest Drainage was 622.05±505.69 ml in group A while it was 846.13±799.67 ml in group B; p=0.04. Mean ventilation time was 10.28 ± 19.88 hours.................. Conclusion: The use of the Radial Artery (RA) in CABG surgery was associated with better early ...............
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
冠状动脉旁路移植术中单根动脉移植物与多根动脉移植物术后早期疗效的比较分析
目的:比较冠状动脉搭桥术(CABG)中单动脉移植与多动脉移植的术后早期疗效:比较冠状动脉旁路移植术(CABG)手术中单动脉移植与多动脉移植的术后早期疗效:分析性横断面研究:研究地点和时间:巴基斯坦拉瓦尔品第武装部队心脏病研究所/国家心脏病研究所成人心脏外科,2022 年 7 月至 2023 年 5 月:149 名计划接受择期孤立 CABG(有两个或两个以上移植物)的患者通过连续抽样被纳入研究。他们被分为两组,A 组(多动脉 CABG 组)和 B 组(传统 CABG 组)。使用结构化表格收集术后早期结果的数据,即重症监护室住院时间、通气时间、肌力维持时间、胸腔引流、心律并发症(包括室上性心动过速(SVT))和死亡率。两组之间的比较采用卡方检验和 t 检验,P<0.05 为差异有统计学意义:在 149 名接受择期心血管造影术的患者中,大多数为男性,占 124 人(83.2%)。患者的平均年龄为(59.18±9.28)岁。74名(49.7%)患者接受了多动脉心血管成形术,75名(50.3%)患者接受了常规心血管成形术。A 组的平均 ICU 留观时间为(56.74±48.30)小时,B 组为(67.25±73.42)小时;P=0.30。A 组的平均胸腔引流量为(622.05±505.69)毫升,B 组为(846.13±799.67)毫升;P=0.04。平均通气时间为 10.28±19.88 小时..................Conclusion:在CABG手术中使用桡动脉(RA)与更好的早期...............。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Pakistan Armed Forces Medical Journal
Pakistan Armed Forces Medical Journal Health Professions-Health Professions (miscellaneous)
CiteScore
0.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
17
审稿时长
24 weeks
期刊最新文献
Clinical Audit on the Quality of Pre-Anaesthesia Assessment based on Predefined Pre-anaesthesia Assessment Form Dyslipidaemia In Acute Non-Cardioembolic Ischemic Stroke Patients At A Tertiary Care Center Differential Impact of Subcutaneous Neurokinin B Administration on Epididymal Proliferation in Adult New Zealand White Rabbits: A Dose-Dependent Study Association of Tumour Budding With Histological Type And Grade, Pathological Stage And Lymph Node Metastasis In Colorectal Carcinoma Pattern Of Maxillofacial Fractures In Combined Military Hospital, Peshawar
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1