Kant’s Critique of the Wolffian “Mathematical Method” and the Ontological Question of Principles in the Deutlichkeit (1764)

Jessica Segesta
{"title":"Kant’s Critique of the Wolffian “Mathematical Method” and the Ontological Question of Principles in the Deutlichkeit (1764)","authors":"Jessica Segesta","doi":"10.7203/rek.8.2.27512","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper examines some key aspects of Kant’s critique of Wolffian mathematical method in the Deutlichkeit (1764). The aim is to show how the ontological question of principles underlies this critique. To do so, I will first show that Wolff identifies the mathematical method with a universal model of inquiry, which is based on the principles of rationalist ontology. I will therefore focus on a key element of this model, namely that of definition. In doing so, I will be able to show that it is precisely by looking at the process of definition that Kant makes his distinction between the synthetic model of mathematics and the analytic one of philosophy. Finally, I will show that for Kant, albeit differently, both these models are not reducible to the formal principles of rationalist ontology.","PeriodicalId":153284,"journal":{"name":"Revista de Estudios Kantianos","volume":"47 6","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista de Estudios Kantianos","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7203/rek.8.2.27512","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This paper examines some key aspects of Kant’s critique of Wolffian mathematical method in the Deutlichkeit (1764). The aim is to show how the ontological question of principles underlies this critique. To do so, I will first show that Wolff identifies the mathematical method with a universal model of inquiry, which is based on the principles of rationalist ontology. I will therefore focus on a key element of this model, namely that of definition. In doing so, I will be able to show that it is precisely by looking at the process of definition that Kant makes his distinction between the synthetic model of mathematics and the analytic one of philosophy. Finally, I will show that for Kant, albeit differently, both these models are not reducible to the formal principles of rationalist ontology.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
康德对沃尔夫 "数学方法 "的批判和《德利凯》中的原则的本体论问题(1764 年)
本文探讨了康德在《德利凯特》(1764 年)中对沃尔夫数学方法批判的一些关键方面。其目的在于说明原则的本体论问题是如何成为这一批判的基础的。为此,我将首先说明,沃尔夫将数学方法与基于理性主义本体论原则的普遍探究模式相提并论。因此,我将重点关注这一模式的一个关键要素,即定义。在此过程中,我将能够证明,康德正是通过考察定义的过程来区分数学的综合模式和哲学的分析模式的。最后,我将说明,对康德来说,尽管方式不同,但这两种模式都不能还原为理性主义本体论的形式原则。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Reseña de Gustavo Leyva (Ed.): Guía Comares de Immanuel Kant. Granada, Comares, 2023, 712 pp. ISBN: 978-84-1369- 582-2 Proprietà privata, sovranità e diritto di escludere: la “disarmonia produttiva” di Kant Kant y el Cosmopolitismo en el debate contemporáneo Reseña de María del Rosario Acosta López y J. Colin McQuillan (Eds.): Critique in German philosophy. From Kant to critical theory, Albany, SUNY Press, 2020, 446 pp. ISBN: 978-1-43-848026-8 Leibniz and Kant on God
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1