{"title":"Machiavelli and the Florentine Book Trade","authors":"Alexander Lee","doi":"10.7227/bjrl.99.2.4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In March 1506, Machiavelli was in the Casentino when he received a letter from\n Agostino Vespucci in Florence. A few weeks earlier, Machiavelli had arranged for\n his Decennale primo – a verse history of Florence\n between 1494 and 1504 – to be printed by Bartolomeo de’ Libri,\n with Vespucci bearing the costs. It was the first of his works in print and had\n already met with some success. Much to Vespucci’s alarm, however, a rival\n printer, Andrea Ghirlandi da Pistoia, was now selling a pirated version,\n festooned with mistakes. This article explores how Vespucci tried to protect\n Machiavelli’s interests and his own investment. It shows how Vespucci\n successfully circumvented the lack of copyright protection by casting the\n pirated version as a form of defamation and exploiting both secular and\n ecclesiastical authorities. In doing so, it casts fresh light on the legal and\n commercial challenges of printing in sixteenth-century Florence.","PeriodicalId":43675,"journal":{"name":"Bulletin of the John Rylands Library","volume":"45 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Bulletin of the John Rylands Library","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7227/bjrl.99.2.4","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
In March 1506, Machiavelli was in the Casentino when he received a letter from
Agostino Vespucci in Florence. A few weeks earlier, Machiavelli had arranged for
his Decennale primo – a verse history of Florence
between 1494 and 1504 – to be printed by Bartolomeo de’ Libri,
with Vespucci bearing the costs. It was the first of his works in print and had
already met with some success. Much to Vespucci’s alarm, however, a rival
printer, Andrea Ghirlandi da Pistoia, was now selling a pirated version,
festooned with mistakes. This article explores how Vespucci tried to protect
Machiavelli’s interests and his own investment. It shows how Vespucci
successfully circumvented the lack of copyright protection by casting the
pirated version as a form of defamation and exploiting both secular and
ecclesiastical authorities. In doing so, it casts fresh light on the legal and
commercial challenges of printing in sixteenth-century Florence.
1506年3月,马基雅维利在卡森提诺收到了来自佛罗伦萨的阿戈斯蒂诺-韦斯普奇的一封信。几周前,马基雅维利安排巴托洛梅奥-德-利布里(Bartolomeo de' Libri)印刷他的《十年》(Decennale primo)--1494年至1504年间的佛罗伦萨诗史,费用由韦斯普奇承担。这是他的第一部印刷作品,已经取得了一定的成功。然而,让韦斯普奇大吃一惊的是,竞争对手 Andrea Ghirlandi da Pistoia 印刷商现在却在销售错误百出的盗版书。本文探讨了韦斯普奇如何努力保护马基雅弗利的利益和自己的投资。文章展示了韦斯普奇如何通过将盗版说成是一种诽谤,并利用世俗和教会当局,成功地规避了版权保护的缺失。在此过程中,该书为 16 世纪佛罗伦萨印刷业面临的法律和商业挑战提供了新的视角。