Challenges of Legal Guarantees for the Enforcement of Arbitral Awards in International Commercial Cases

Oleksii Makarenkov, Lurdes Varregoso Mesquita
{"title":"Challenges of Legal Guarantees for the Enforcement of Arbitral Awards in International Commercial Cases","authors":"Oleksii Makarenkov, Lurdes Varregoso Mesquita","doi":"10.33327/ajee-18-7.1-a000133","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: The historical determinants of the appearance of international arbitration correspond to the general tendency of the complication of legal relations of highly developed civilisations, where business processes are its drivers. It is expected that a complex transnational business layered on different levels of civilisation is characterised by an increase in the probability of misunderstandings regarding the proper fulfilment of obligations, the resolution of which is referred to as international arbitration, which, by nature, is more effective than national courts. In this regard, within legal doctrine and among legal practitioners, there is an ongoing discourse on strategies to mitigate risks associated with the execution of international arbitration decisions and related issues.\nMethods: The research employed a methodological toolkit encompassing formal and dialectical logic, a synergistic methodological approach. The primary method within this framework was the synergistic analysis of the transformation of formal-legal sources and the corresponding application practices. Additional methods included historical-legal, comparative-legal, formal-dogmatic methods and contextual analysis.\nResults and Conclusions: Formal-legal guarantees for the execution of international arbitration decisions represent a system of requirements governing the procedural and actual actions of state- authorised persons (bodies) that ultimately lead to such execution. The basis of such guarantees is the adequacy of the subject to which the method is applied. Firstly, the arbitrators must make the decision. Secondly, this concerns a property (commercial) dispute. Thirdly and fourthly, enforcement of arbitral awards made in the territory of a State other than the State where the recognition and enforcement of such awards are sought and arising out of differences between persons, whether physical or legal. These signs follow from the corresponding specific acts of private international law. The enforceability of an arbitral award depends on the timely and appropriate actions of the parties to the contract. Even during the negotiation of a foreign economic agreement, the result of an audit of the business partner’s reliability in terms of its ability to fulfil its financial and/or other obligations properly should be obtained.","PeriodicalId":40329,"journal":{"name":"Access to Justice in Eastern Europe","volume":"20 23","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Access to Justice in Eastern Europe","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.33327/ajee-18-7.1-a000133","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"LAW","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The historical determinants of the appearance of international arbitration correspond to the general tendency of the complication of legal relations of highly developed civilisations, where business processes are its drivers. It is expected that a complex transnational business layered on different levels of civilisation is characterised by an increase in the probability of misunderstandings regarding the proper fulfilment of obligations, the resolution of which is referred to as international arbitration, which, by nature, is more effective than national courts. In this regard, within legal doctrine and among legal practitioners, there is an ongoing discourse on strategies to mitigate risks associated with the execution of international arbitration decisions and related issues. Methods: The research employed a methodological toolkit encompassing formal and dialectical logic, a synergistic methodological approach. The primary method within this framework was the synergistic analysis of the transformation of formal-legal sources and the corresponding application practices. Additional methods included historical-legal, comparative-legal, formal-dogmatic methods and contextual analysis. Results and Conclusions: Formal-legal guarantees for the execution of international arbitration decisions represent a system of requirements governing the procedural and actual actions of state- authorised persons (bodies) that ultimately lead to such execution. The basis of such guarantees is the adequacy of the subject to which the method is applied. Firstly, the arbitrators must make the decision. Secondly, this concerns a property (commercial) dispute. Thirdly and fourthly, enforcement of arbitral awards made in the territory of a State other than the State where the recognition and enforcement of such awards are sought and arising out of differences between persons, whether physical or legal. These signs follow from the corresponding specific acts of private international law. The enforceability of an arbitral award depends on the timely and appropriate actions of the parties to the contract. Even during the negotiation of a foreign economic agreement, the result of an audit of the business partner’s reliability in terms of its ability to fulfil its financial and/or other obligations properly should be obtained.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
在国际商事案件中执行仲裁裁决的法律保障所面临的挑战
背景:国际仲裁出现的历史决定因素符合高度发达文明法律关系复杂化的普遍趋势,其中商业流程是其驱动力。在复杂的跨国商业中,不同文明层级之间的关系会变得复杂,因此在正确履行义务方面发生误解的可能性也会增加,而解决这种误解的办法就是国际仲裁,因为从本质上讲,国际仲裁比国内法院更有效。在这方面,法律理论界和法律从业人员一直在讨论如何降低与执行国际仲裁裁决和相关问题有关的风险:研究采用了一套方法论工具,包括形式逻辑和辩证逻辑,这是一种协同方法论。这一框架内的主要方法是对形式-法律来源的转变和相应的应用实践进行协同分析。其他方法包括历史-法律、比较-法律、形式-教条方法和语境分析:执行国际仲裁裁决的正式法律保障代表着一套要求体系,规范最终导致执行裁决的国家授权人员(机构)的程序和实际行动。这种保障的基础是适用该方法的主体的适当性。首先,仲裁员必须做出裁决。其次,这涉及财产(商业)纠纷。第三和第四,在寻求承认和执行仲裁裁决的国家以外的国家领土上作出的仲裁裁决的执行,以及由人与人之间的分歧(无论是自然人还是法人)引起的仲裁裁决的执行。这些标志来自国际私法的相应具体法案。仲裁裁决的可执行性取决于合同当事人及时和适当的行动。即使在对外经济协议的谈判过程中,也应获得对商业伙伴在适当履行其财务和/或其他义务的能力方面的可靠性的审计结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.00
自引率
50.00%
发文量
62
审稿时长
6 weeks
期刊最新文献
Challenges of Legal Guarantees for the Enforcement of Arbitral Awards in International Commercial Cases Advancing Sustainable Justice through AI-Based Case Law Analysis The Implementation of Consensual Tenet in Modern Civil Procedure: Comparative Analysis of Court-Connected Settlement Procedures Applied in Austria, Lithuania, and Ukraine Human Trafficking in Western Balkan: Case Study of Kosovo Towards an Effective Legal Protection for Older Persons in the 21st Century: A Comparative Study of International Human Rights Law and Arab Constitutions
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1