Characterizing Gelatin-Based Desserts Using International Dysphagia Diet Standardisation Initiative Testing Methods

Deirdre Larsen, Mathew Vansant, Meghan Eisenhardt
{"title":"Characterizing Gelatin-Based Desserts Using International Dysphagia Diet Standardisation Initiative Testing Methods","authors":"Deirdre Larsen, Mathew Vansant, Meghan Eisenhardt","doi":"10.1044/2023_persp-23-00159","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n \n Gelatin-based desserts are a popular method to promote liquid consumption for individuals with dysphagia. Unique characteristics of these desserts in the United States pose a challenge for appropriate presentation to patients in relation to their clinically approved International Dysphagia Diet Standardisation Initiative (IDDSI) level. The purpose of this study was to determine the constancy of IDDSI level and transitional food status for 16 nationally available gelatin-based desserts based on preparation (premade and ready-to-make) and formulation (regular and sugar-free).\n \n \n \n Three semiblinded raters used IDDSI testing methods to assign an IDDSI level and transitional food rating immediately, 15 min, and 60 min after removing from the refrigerator.\n \n \n \n \n The majority (89.6%) of the samples were rated as Level 7 Easy to Chew, across all time intervals, with good interrater agreement (Mann–Whitney\n U\n Test, immediately\n U\n = 101.0,\n p\n = .934; 15 min\n U\n = 101.0,\n p\n = .934; 60 min\n U\n = 94.5,\n p\n = .711). Approximately a quarter of samples were categorized as a transitional food, though 4% could not be categorized using current IDDSI characteristics.\n \n \n \n \n Overall, this study presents that the current characteristics and physiological rationale may overestimate the skills required for gelatin-based desserts and inappropriately classify them as nontransitional foods. As with all products, individual gelatin-based desserts should be tested at the time of presentation to the patient. However, clinical evaluation should further determine the appropriateness of the dessert for each patient.\n","PeriodicalId":74424,"journal":{"name":"Perspectives of the ASHA special interest groups","volume":"22 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Perspectives of the ASHA special interest groups","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1044/2023_persp-23-00159","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Gelatin-based desserts are a popular method to promote liquid consumption for individuals with dysphagia. Unique characteristics of these desserts in the United States pose a challenge for appropriate presentation to patients in relation to their clinically approved International Dysphagia Diet Standardisation Initiative (IDDSI) level. The purpose of this study was to determine the constancy of IDDSI level and transitional food status for 16 nationally available gelatin-based desserts based on preparation (premade and ready-to-make) and formulation (regular and sugar-free). Three semiblinded raters used IDDSI testing methods to assign an IDDSI level and transitional food rating immediately, 15 min, and 60 min after removing from the refrigerator. The majority (89.6%) of the samples were rated as Level 7 Easy to Chew, across all time intervals, with good interrater agreement (Mann–Whitney U Test, immediately U = 101.0, p = .934; 15 min U = 101.0, p = .934; 60 min U = 94.5, p = .711). Approximately a quarter of samples were categorized as a transitional food, though 4% could not be categorized using current IDDSI characteristics. Overall, this study presents that the current characteristics and physiological rationale may overestimate the skills required for gelatin-based desserts and inappropriately classify them as nontransitional foods. As with all products, individual gelatin-based desserts should be tested at the time of presentation to the patient. However, clinical evaluation should further determine the appropriateness of the dessert for each patient.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
利用国际吞咽困难饮食标准化倡议测试方法确定明胶甜点的特性
明胶甜点是促进吞咽困难患者进食液体的常用方法。在美国,这些甜点的独特性给如何根据临床批准的国际吞咽困难饮食标准化倡议(IDSSI)级别向患者提供适当的甜点带来了挑战。本研究的目的是根据制备方法(预制和即食)和配方(普通和无糖)确定 16 种全国销售的明胶基甜点的 IDDSI 级别恒定性和过渡食品地位。 三位半盲评分员使用 IDDSI 测试方法对从冰箱中取出后的即时、15 分钟和 60 分钟内的 IDDSI 级别和过渡性食品进行评分。 大多数(89.6%)样品在所有时间间隔内都被评为 7 级易咀嚼,评分者之间的一致性良好(Mann-Whitney U 测试,立即 U = 101.0,p = .934;15 分钟 U = 101.0,p = .934;60 分钟 U = 94.5,p = .711)。约有四分之一的样本被归类为过渡性食品,但有 4% 的样本无法使用当前的 IDDSI 特征进行归类。 总之,这项研究表明,目前的特征和生理原理可能会高估明胶甜点所需的技能,并将其不恰当地归类为非过渡性食品。与所有产品一样,患者在食用明胶类甜点时也应进行检测。不过,临床评估应进一步确定甜点是否适合每位患者。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Some Challenging Questions About Outcomes in Children With Cochlear Implants. A Case Study of Suspected Childhood Apraxia of Sign. Promoting Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion for Asian Americans and Pacific Islanders in Speech-Language-Hearing Sciences Shared Book Reading Experiences for Young Children Who Use Augmentative and Alternative Communication Systems Recommendations for Expanding the Clinical Role of Audiologists in Hospitals in Mainland China: Insights From a Survey-Based Study
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1