Meeting Marginal Demands in New Welfare Governance? China’s Contracting of Welfare Services in the Sectors of Disability and HIV/AIDS

IF 2.3 3区 社会学 Q1 SOCIAL ISSUES Social Policy and Society Pub Date : 2023-12-20 DOI:10.1017/s1474746423000465
Yuanyuan Qu, Regina Enjuto Martinez, Jude Howell
{"title":"Meeting Marginal Demands in New Welfare Governance? China’s Contracting of Welfare Services in the Sectors of Disability and HIV/AIDS","authors":"Yuanyuan Qu, Regina Enjuto Martinez, Jude Howell","doi":"10.1017/s1474746423000465","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n Since 2013, China has rolled out a policy to contract welfare services to non-governmental forces. This has stimulated a growing body of research on the change of China’s welfare governance. This article focuses on a topic that needs to be added, which is the variation of contracting across different service sectors and the operation of the policy in meeting the needs of marginal people. Based on policy analyses and in-depth interviews, we examine services contracting in the sectors of disability and Human Immunodeficiency Virus/Acquired Immunodeficiency Syndrome (HIV/AIDS). We found a lack of services provision for the marginal groups in the general contracting of public service. Between the two sectors, we found variations in their definition of welfare services, institutional settings, and specific contracting practices. We argue that while contracting is often seen as a new welfare governance mechanism, it fails to revitalise social services and reproduces welfare inequalities across different groups in China.","PeriodicalId":47397,"journal":{"name":"Social Policy and Society","volume":"118 29","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Social Policy and Society","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/s1474746423000465","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SOCIAL ISSUES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Since 2013, China has rolled out a policy to contract welfare services to non-governmental forces. This has stimulated a growing body of research on the change of China’s welfare governance. This article focuses on a topic that needs to be added, which is the variation of contracting across different service sectors and the operation of the policy in meeting the needs of marginal people. Based on policy analyses and in-depth interviews, we examine services contracting in the sectors of disability and Human Immunodeficiency Virus/Acquired Immunodeficiency Syndrome (HIV/AIDS). We found a lack of services provision for the marginal groups in the general contracting of public service. Between the two sectors, we found variations in their definition of welfare services, institutional settings, and specific contracting practices. We argue that while contracting is often seen as a new welfare governance mechanism, it fails to revitalise social services and reproduces welfare inequalities across different groups in China.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
在新福利治理中满足边缘需求?中国在残疾人和艾滋病领域的福利服务外包
自 2013 年以来,中国推出了将福利服务承包给非政府力量的政策。这激发了越来越多关于中国福利治理变革的研究。本文聚焦于一个需要补充的话题,即不同服务领域的承包差异以及该政策在满足边缘人群需求方面的运行情况。基于政策分析和深入访谈,我们研究了残疾人和人体免疫缺陷病毒/获得性免疫缺陷综合症(HIV/AIDS)领域的服务承包情况。我们发现,在公共服务的一般承包中,缺乏为边缘群体提供的服务。在这两个部门之间,我们发现它们对福利服务的定义、机构设置和具体的承包做法都不尽相同。我们认为,尽管承包制通常被视为一种新的福利治理机制,但它未能振兴社会服务,并在中国的不同群体中复制了福利不平等。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.70
自引率
6.70%
发文量
67
期刊最新文献
The ‘Perfect Storm’: Food Banks and Food Insecurity During the Covid-19 Pandemic Five Factors for Effective Policy to Improve Attitudes towards People with Disability Homelessness Transitions, Risks, and Prevention Across the Life Course Silent Elements of Policy Change: Inflation and Uprating Mechanisms in the Low Countries Exclusionary Mechanisms of Social Policy Redistribution in Hungary
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1