A COMPARISON OF DIFFERENT GIS-BASED INTERPOLATION METHODS FOR BATHYMETRIC DATA: CASE STUDY OF BAWEAN ISLAND, EAST JAVA

IF 2.1 Q3 REMOTE SENSING Geodesy and Cartography Pub Date : 2023-12-19 DOI:10.3846/gac.2023.18250
D. Pratomo, Rizka Amelia Dwi Safira, Olivia Stefani
{"title":"A COMPARISON OF DIFFERENT GIS-BASED INTERPOLATION METHODS FOR BATHYMETRIC DATA: CASE STUDY OF BAWEAN ISLAND, EAST JAVA","authors":"D. Pratomo, Rizka Amelia Dwi Safira, Olivia Stefani","doi":"10.3846/gac.2023.18250","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The bottom surface’s portrayal is crucial in many different practices. Therefore, accurate bathymetry data is required. The interpolation method is one element that influences the accuracy of a Single Beam Echosounder’s depth data. IDW, Kriging, and TIN are three standard interpolation techniques. This study compares these three methods with two scenarios utilizing the spatial analysis to establish the most effective technique for producing the digital elevation model of the seafloor beneath Bawean Island. The IDW exhibits the strongest R-squared (0.9998779 in Scenario-1 and 0.9999875 in Scenario-2) and correlation (0.9998796 in Scenario-1 and 0.9999595 in Scenario-2). It indicates that IDW and bathymetric data have the closest relationships. IDW has the lowest error, as measured by the MAE value (0.02 in Scenario-1 and 0.009 in Scenario-2), followed in both cases by Kriging and TIN. Additionally, the RMSE for IDW shows the same outcome (0.045 in Scenario 1 and 0.016 in Scenario 2). In the meantime, comparing the first and second scenarios reveals that the second, which has fewer data, is preferable to the first. Since the MAE and RMSE in the first scenario are greater than those in the second, we may infer that more data leads to more significant errors.","PeriodicalId":44129,"journal":{"name":"Geodesy and Cartography","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Geodesy and Cartography","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3846/gac.2023.18250","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"REMOTE SENSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The bottom surface’s portrayal is crucial in many different practices. Therefore, accurate bathymetry data is required. The interpolation method is one element that influences the accuracy of a Single Beam Echosounder’s depth data. IDW, Kriging, and TIN are three standard interpolation techniques. This study compares these three methods with two scenarios utilizing the spatial analysis to establish the most effective technique for producing the digital elevation model of the seafloor beneath Bawean Island. The IDW exhibits the strongest R-squared (0.9998779 in Scenario-1 and 0.9999875 in Scenario-2) and correlation (0.9998796 in Scenario-1 and 0.9999595 in Scenario-2). It indicates that IDW and bathymetric data have the closest relationships. IDW has the lowest error, as measured by the MAE value (0.02 in Scenario-1 and 0.009 in Scenario-2), followed in both cases by Kriging and TIN. Additionally, the RMSE for IDW shows the same outcome (0.045 in Scenario 1 and 0.016 in Scenario 2). In the meantime, comparing the first and second scenarios reveals that the second, which has fewer data, is preferable to the first. Since the MAE and RMSE in the first scenario are greater than those in the second, we may infer that more data leads to more significant errors.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
基于地理信息系统的不同测深数据插值方法的比较:东爪哇巴威恩岛案例研究
底面的描绘在许多不同的实践中都至关重要。因此,需要精确的测深数据。插值方法是影响单波束回声测深仪深度数据准确性的因素之一。IDW、Kriging 和 TIN 是三种标准的插值技术。本研究将这三种方法与利用空间分析的两种方案进行比较,以确定制作巴威恩岛海底数字高程模型的最有效技术。IDW 显示出最强的 R 平方(方案 1 为 0.9998779,方案 2 为 0.9999875)和相关性(方案 1 为 0.9998796,方案 2 为 0.9999595)。这表明 IDW 和测深数据的关系最为密切。从 MAE 值来看,IDW 的误差最小(方案 1 为 0.02,方案 2 为 0.009),其次是克里金法和 TIN 法。此外,IDW 的 RMSE 也显示了相同的结果(方案 1 中为 0.045,方案 2 中为 0.016)。同时,比较第一种和第二种方案可以发现,数据较少的第二种方案优于第一种方案。由于第一种方案的 MAE 和 RMSE 大于第二种方案,我们可以推断数据越多,误差越大。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Geodesy and Cartography
Geodesy and Cartography REMOTE SENSING-
CiteScore
1.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
15 weeks
期刊介绍: THE JOURNAL IS DESIGNED FOR PUBLISHING PAPERS CONCERNING THE FOLLOWING FIELDS OF RESEARCH: •study, establishment and improvement of the geodesy and mapping technologies, •establishing and improving the geodetic networks, •theoretical and practical principles of developing standards for geodetic measurements, •mathematical treatment of the geodetic and photogrammetric measurements, •controlling and application of the permanent GPS stations, •study and measurements of Earth’s figure and parameters of the gravity field, •study and development the geoid models,
期刊最新文献
Updating the RF entities’ local coordinate systems, created from CS-95, based on SCS-2011 Obidenko V. I. Siberian State University of Geosystems and Technologies 630108, Russia, Novosibirsk, Plakhotnogo st., 10 ovi62@yandex.ru Development of a draft national standard in the field of geodesy and cartography: topographic monitoring for updating digital (electronic) topographic maps and spatial data Analysis of the state geodetic network development and protection Geoinformation analysis of agroforestry landscapes spatial characteristics Assessment of specially protected areas’ investment attractiveness level to develop ecological tourism
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1