Improved Fault Detection in Chemical Engineering Processes via Non-Parametric Kolmogorov–Smirnov-Based Monitoring Strategy

IF 2.8 Q2 ENGINEERING, CHEMICAL ChemEngineering Pub Date : 2023-12-19 DOI:10.3390/chemengineering8010001
K. Kini, Muddu Madakyaru, F. Harrou, Mukund Kumar Menon, Ying Sun
{"title":"Improved Fault Detection in Chemical Engineering Processes via Non-Parametric Kolmogorov–Smirnov-Based Monitoring Strategy","authors":"K. Kini, Muddu Madakyaru, F. Harrou, Mukund Kumar Menon, Ying Sun","doi":"10.3390/chemengineering8010001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Fault detection is crucial in maintaining reliability, safety, and consistent product quality in chemical engineering processes. Accurate fault detection allows for identifying anomalies, signaling deviations from the system’s nominal behavior, ensuring the system operates within desired performance parameters, and minimizing potential losses. This paper presents a novel semi-supervised data-based monitoring technique for fault detection in multivariate processes. To this end, the proposed approach merges the capabilities of Principal Component Analysis (PCA) for dimensionality reduction and feature extraction with the Kolmogorov–Smirnov (KS)-based scheme for fault detection. The KS indicator is computed between the two distributions in a moving window of fixed length, allowing it to capture sensitive details that enhance the detection of faults. Moreover, no labeling is required when using this fault detection approach, making it flexible in practice. The performance of the proposed PCA–KS strategy is assessed for different sensor faults on benchmark processes, specifically the Plug Flow Reactor (PFR) process and the benchmark Tennessee Eastman (TE) process. Different sensor faults, including bias, intermittent, and aging faults, are considered in this study to evaluate the proposed fault detection scheme. The results demonstrate that the proposed approach surpasses traditional PCA-based methods. Specifically, when applied to PFR data, it achieves a high average detection rate of 98.31% and a low false alarm rate of 0.25%. Similarly, when applied to the TE process, it provides a good average detection rate of 97.27% and a false alarm rate of 6.32%. These results underscore the efficacy of the proposed PCA–KS approach in enhancing the fault detection of high-dimensional processes.","PeriodicalId":9755,"journal":{"name":"ChemEngineering","volume":" 831","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ChemEngineering","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/chemengineering8010001","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, CHEMICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Fault detection is crucial in maintaining reliability, safety, and consistent product quality in chemical engineering processes. Accurate fault detection allows for identifying anomalies, signaling deviations from the system’s nominal behavior, ensuring the system operates within desired performance parameters, and minimizing potential losses. This paper presents a novel semi-supervised data-based monitoring technique for fault detection in multivariate processes. To this end, the proposed approach merges the capabilities of Principal Component Analysis (PCA) for dimensionality reduction and feature extraction with the Kolmogorov–Smirnov (KS)-based scheme for fault detection. The KS indicator is computed between the two distributions in a moving window of fixed length, allowing it to capture sensitive details that enhance the detection of faults. Moreover, no labeling is required when using this fault detection approach, making it flexible in practice. The performance of the proposed PCA–KS strategy is assessed for different sensor faults on benchmark processes, specifically the Plug Flow Reactor (PFR) process and the benchmark Tennessee Eastman (TE) process. Different sensor faults, including bias, intermittent, and aging faults, are considered in this study to evaluate the proposed fault detection scheme. The results demonstrate that the proposed approach surpasses traditional PCA-based methods. Specifically, when applied to PFR data, it achieves a high average detection rate of 98.31% and a low false alarm rate of 0.25%. Similarly, when applied to the TE process, it provides a good average detection rate of 97.27% and a false alarm rate of 6.32%. These results underscore the efficacy of the proposed PCA–KS approach in enhancing the fault detection of high-dimensional processes.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
通过基于非参数 Kolmogorov-Smirnov 监测策略改进化学工程过程中的故障检测
故障检测对于保持化学工程流程的可靠性、安全性和产品质量的一致性至关重要。准确的故障检测可以识别异常情况,发出偏离系统标称行为的信号,确保系统在所需的性能参数范围内运行,并将潜在损失降至最低。本文提出了一种新颖的基于数据的半监督监控技术,用于多元过程中的故障检测。为此,所提出的方法将用于降维和特征提取的主成分分析(PCA)功能与基于 Kolmogorov-Smirnov (KS) 的故障检测方案相结合。KS 指标是在固定长度的移动窗口中对两个分布进行计算的,因此可以捕捉到敏感的细节,从而增强故障检测能力。此外,使用这种故障检测方法无需标记,因此在实践中非常灵活。针对基准工艺上的不同传感器故障,特别是塞流反应器(PFR)工艺和基准田纳西伊士曼(TE)工艺,对所提出的 PCA-KS 策略的性能进行了评估。本研究考虑了不同的传感器故障,包括偏差、间歇和老化故障,以评估所提出的故障检测方案。结果表明,所提出的方法超越了传统的基于 PCA 的方法。具体来说,当应用于 PFR 数据时,它实现了 98.31% 的高平均检测率和 0.25% 的低误报率。同样,当应用于 TE 过程时,它的平均检测率为 97.27%,误报率为 6.32%。这些结果证明了所提出的 PCA-KS 方法在增强高维过程故障检测方面的功效。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
ChemEngineering
ChemEngineering Engineering-Engineering (all)
CiteScore
4.00
自引率
4.00%
发文量
88
审稿时长
11 weeks
期刊最新文献
Catalysts Based on Iron Oxides for Wastewater Purification from Phenolic Compounds: Synthesis, Physicochemical Analysis, Determination of Catalytic Activity Effect of Inserting Baffles on the Solid Particle Segregation Behavior in Fluidized Bed Reactor: A Computational Study Force Field for Calculation of the Vapor-Liquid Phase Equilibrium of trans-Decalin Antisolvent Crystallization of Papain Ultrafiltration to Increase the Consistency of Fruit Pulps: The Role of Permeate Flux
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1