Nature-based solutions in agricultural landscapes for reducing tradeoffs between food production, climate change, and conservation objectives

IF 2.6 Q2 WATER RESOURCES Frontiers in Water Pub Date : 2023-12-19 DOI:10.3389/frwa.2023.1247322
Fernando Miralles-Wilhelm
{"title":"Nature-based solutions in agricultural landscapes for reducing tradeoffs between food production, climate change, and conservation objectives","authors":"Fernando Miralles-Wilhelm","doi":"10.3389/frwa.2023.1247322","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper presents a synthesis of evidence and implementation gaps in the application of nature-based solutions (NbS) in agricultural landscapes that contribute to reduce trade-offs between food production, climate change and conservation objectives. The literature and data surveyed relies primarily in peer-reviewed sources and is organized around an overview of NbS science and applications in agricultural landscapes in major biomes. To date, the focus of NbS applications in food production has been predominantly for carbon sequestration, water quality, and disaster-risk management objectives while documented examples of NbS benefits in agricultural production are sparse. Conservation applications of NbS appear to show evidence of effectiveness across multiple objectives in biodiversity, land, soil and water. Evidence and analysis of NbS to meet climate change mitigation targets has surged in recent years driven by global community efforts. Overall, considerable scientific work remains to refine and reduce the uncertainty of NbS benefit estimates across production, climate and conservation objectives, and resilience implications. However, delaying implementation of NbS in agricultural landscapes would likely increase the costs to meet agricultural production, climate, conservation and other societally beneficial goals, while degrading the capacity of natural systems to continue to provide these and other ecosystem services.","PeriodicalId":33801,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in Water","volume":" 7","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in Water","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/frwa.2023.1247322","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"WATER RESOURCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This paper presents a synthesis of evidence and implementation gaps in the application of nature-based solutions (NbS) in agricultural landscapes that contribute to reduce trade-offs between food production, climate change and conservation objectives. The literature and data surveyed relies primarily in peer-reviewed sources and is organized around an overview of NbS science and applications in agricultural landscapes in major biomes. To date, the focus of NbS applications in food production has been predominantly for carbon sequestration, water quality, and disaster-risk management objectives while documented examples of NbS benefits in agricultural production are sparse. Conservation applications of NbS appear to show evidence of effectiveness across multiple objectives in biodiversity, land, soil and water. Evidence and analysis of NbS to meet climate change mitigation targets has surged in recent years driven by global community efforts. Overall, considerable scientific work remains to refine and reduce the uncertainty of NbS benefit estimates across production, climate and conservation objectives, and resilience implications. However, delaying implementation of NbS in agricultural landscapes would likely increase the costs to meet agricultural production, climate, conservation and other societally beneficial goals, while degrading the capacity of natural systems to continue to provide these and other ecosystem services.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
农业景观中基于自然的解决方案,以减少粮食生产、气候变化和保护目标之间的权衡
本文综述了在农业景观中应用基于自然的解决方案(NbS)的证据和实施差距,这些方案有助于减少粮食生产、气候变化和保护目标之间的权衡。所调查的文献和数据主要来自同行评议来源,并围绕主要生物群落中农业景观中的 NbS 科学与应用概述展开。迄今为止,氮氧化物悬浮微粒在粮食生产中的应用主要集中在碳封存、水质和灾害风险管理目标上,而有关氮氧化物悬浮微粒在农业生产中的益处的文献实例却很少。有证据表明,氮氧化物悬浮微粒在生物多样性、土地、土壤和水等多个目标中的保护应用似乎都很有效。近年来,在全球社会努力的推动下,为实现减缓气候变化的目标,有关核生物安全的证据和分析激增。总体而言,仍有大量的科学工作要做,以完善和减少对生产、气候和保护目标以及恢复能力影响方面的氮减排效益估算的不确定性。然而,推迟在农业景观中实施 NbS 可能会增加实现农业生产、气候、保护和其他社会效益目标的成本,同时降低自然系统继续提供这些及其他生态系统服务的能力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Frontiers in Water
Frontiers in Water WATER RESOURCES-
CiteScore
4.00
自引率
6.90%
发文量
224
审稿时长
13 weeks
期刊最新文献
River-floodplain connectivity and residence times controlled by topographic bluffs along a backwater transition Rating curve development and uncertainty analysis in mountainous watersheds for informed hydrology and resource management Characterization of sewage quality and its spatiotemporal variations in a small town in Eastern Guangdong, China Model and remote-sensing-guided experimental design and hypothesis generation for monitoring snow-soil–plant interactions Precipitation fuels dissolved greenhouse gas (CO2, CH4, N2O) dynamics in a peatland-dominated headwater stream: results from a continuous monitoring setup
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1