A Monte Carlo Fuel Assembly Model Validation Adopting Post Irradiation Experiment Dataset

IF 0.5 Q4 NUCLEAR SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY Journal of Nuclear Engineering and Radiation Science Pub Date : 2023-12-19 DOI:10.1115/1.4064308
Lorenzo Loi, A. Cammi, S. Lorenzi, C. Introini
{"title":"A Monte Carlo Fuel Assembly Model Validation Adopting Post Irradiation Experiment Dataset","authors":"Lorenzo Loi, A. Cammi, S. Lorenzi, C. Introini","doi":"10.1115/1.4064308","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n Within a hybrid energy system, it is fundamental to have accurate and reliable computational tools to predict the plants; behaviour under different operating conditions; compared to other energy sources, analysis methods for nuclear systems must provide detailed information on reactor criticality and fuel evolution. Thanks to the advancements in computational hardware, using three-dimensional codes to obtain a local description of the reactor core has now become feasible both for deterministic codes and for Monte Carlo (MC) codes. Those computational methods must be compared with experimental measurements to assess their reliability. For this reason, the 3D MC code SERPENT is currently being validated for Light Water Reactor (LWR) fuel cycle simulations. This work will compare the isotopic concentrations measured in a Post Irradiation Experiment and the results of the MC routine, examining the Takahama-3 assembly test case. From literature reports, roughly 35 nuclide species have been measured at different axial locations by destructive analysis following several radiochemical techniques. A sensitivity analysis to evaluate the impact of design features on the results was carried out investigating the cross-section libraries, the simulation time discretisation and the imposition of an axial time-varying temperature. During the process, systematic sources of geometry-related errors were analysed as well. Overall, the model showed good agreement with the experimental data under an acceptable error threshold. The sensitivity studies also showed how the prediction capability could be increased up to +6%, adopting a realistic temperature mesh for the fuel instead of a uniform temperature approach.","PeriodicalId":16756,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Nuclear Engineering and Radiation Science","volume":" 14","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Nuclear Engineering and Radiation Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4064308","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"NUCLEAR SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Within a hybrid energy system, it is fundamental to have accurate and reliable computational tools to predict the plants; behaviour under different operating conditions; compared to other energy sources, analysis methods for nuclear systems must provide detailed information on reactor criticality and fuel evolution. Thanks to the advancements in computational hardware, using three-dimensional codes to obtain a local description of the reactor core has now become feasible both for deterministic codes and for Monte Carlo (MC) codes. Those computational methods must be compared with experimental measurements to assess their reliability. For this reason, the 3D MC code SERPENT is currently being validated for Light Water Reactor (LWR) fuel cycle simulations. This work will compare the isotopic concentrations measured in a Post Irradiation Experiment and the results of the MC routine, examining the Takahama-3 assembly test case. From literature reports, roughly 35 nuclide species have been measured at different axial locations by destructive analysis following several radiochemical techniques. A sensitivity analysis to evaluate the impact of design features on the results was carried out investigating the cross-section libraries, the simulation time discretisation and the imposition of an axial time-varying temperature. During the process, systematic sources of geometry-related errors were analysed as well. Overall, the model showed good agreement with the experimental data under an acceptable error threshold. The sensitivity studies also showed how the prediction capability could be increased up to +6%, adopting a realistic temperature mesh for the fuel instead of a uniform temperature approach.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
采用辐照后实验数据集的蒙特卡罗燃料组件模型验证
在混合能源系统中,最重要的是要有准确可靠的计算工具来预测发电厂在不同运行条件下的行为;与其他能源相比,核系统的分析方法必须提供反应堆临界状态和燃料演变的详细信息。由于计算硬件的进步,无论是确定性代码还是蒙特卡罗(MC)代码,使用三维代码获得反应堆堆芯的局部描述现已变得可行。这些计算方法必须与实验测量结果进行比较,以评估其可靠性。因此,三维 MC 代码 SERPENT 目前正在进行轻水反应堆(LWR)燃料循环模拟验证。这项工作将比较在辐照后实验中测得的同位素浓度和 MC 程序的结果,并对高滨-3 号装配测试案例进行研究。根据文献报告,通过采用多种放射化学技术进行破坏性分析,在不同轴向位置测量了大约 35 种核素。对横截面库、模拟时间离散化和轴向时变温度进行了敏感性分析,以评估设计特征对结果的影响。在此过程中,还分析了几何相关误差的系统来源。总体而言,在可接受的误差阈值范围内,模型与实验数据显示出良好的一致性。灵敏度研究还表明,如果采用现实的燃料温度网格而不是均匀温度方法,预测能力最多可提高 6%。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
56
期刊介绍: The Journal of Nuclear Engineering and Radiation Science is ASME’s latest title within the energy sector. The publication is for specialists in the nuclear/power engineering areas of industry, academia, and government.
期刊最新文献
Verification and Geometry Optimization of a One Fluid Molten Salt Reactor (OFMSR) with Fixed Volume The Transfer of Xenon-135 to Molten Salt Reactor Graphite Molten Salt Pump Journal-Bearings Dynamic Characteristics Under Hydrodynamic Lubrication Conditions Technical Brief: Safeguardability Analysis of a Molten Salt Sampling System Design An Improved Heat Flux Partitioning Model of Nucleate Boiling Under Saturated Pool Boiling Condition
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1