PENGARUH INDEPENDENSI, OBJEKTIVITAS, PENGALAMAN KERJA, KOMPETENSI, INTEGRITAS DAN SKEPTISME PROFESIONALTERHADAP KUALITAS AUDIT (STUDI DI INSPEKTORAT PROVINSI BENGKULU)

Fadli
{"title":"PENGARUH INDEPENDENSI, OBJEKTIVITAS, PENGALAMAN KERJA, KOMPETENSI, INTEGRITAS DAN SKEPTISME PROFESIONALTERHADAP KUALITAS AUDIT (STUDI DI INSPEKTORAT PROVINSI BENGKULU)","authors":"Fadli","doi":"10.33369/fairness.v12i1.31880","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study aims to find empirical evidence regarding the effect of independence, objectivity, work experience, competence, integrity and professional skepticism on audit quality at the Bengkulu Provincial Inspectorate. The type of research used in this research is quantitative research. The type of data used is primary data in the form of values or scores for the answers given by respondents to the questions in the questionnaire. The sampling technique used is the saturated sample/census method. \nBased on sampling through the saturated sample/census method, 46 samples of Bengkulu Province Inspectorate auditors were obtained. The data was processed through the multiple linear regression statistical test method using SPSS software version 21. The results of the study found that competence had a positive effect on audit quality. Meanwhile, independence, objectivity, work experience integrity and professional skepticism have no effect on audit quality.","PeriodicalId":402161,"journal":{"name":"JURNAL FAIRNESS","volume":" 17","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JURNAL FAIRNESS","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.33369/fairness.v12i1.31880","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study aims to find empirical evidence regarding the effect of independence, objectivity, work experience, competence, integrity and professional skepticism on audit quality at the Bengkulu Provincial Inspectorate. The type of research used in this research is quantitative research. The type of data used is primary data in the form of values or scores for the answers given by respondents to the questions in the questionnaire. The sampling technique used is the saturated sample/census method. Based on sampling through the saturated sample/census method, 46 samples of Bengkulu Province Inspectorate auditors were obtained. The data was processed through the multiple linear regression statistical test method using SPSS software version 21. The results of the study found that competence had a positive effect on audit quality. Meanwhile, independence, objectivity, work experience integrity and professional skepticism have no effect on audit quality.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
独立性、客观性、工作经验、胜任能力、诚信和职业怀疑态度对审计质量的影响(对明古鲁省监察局的研究)
本研究旨在寻找有关独立性、客观性、工作经验、胜任能力、诚信和专业怀疑态度对明古鲁省监察局审计质量影响的实证证据。本研究采用的研究类型为定量研究。所使用的数据类型为原始数据,其形式为受访者对问卷中问题所做回答的数值或分数。使用的抽样技术是饱和样本/普查法。通过饱和样本/普查法抽样,获得了 46 个明古鲁省监察局审计人员样本。数据通过使用 SPSS 软件 21 版的多元线性回归统计检验方法进行处理。研究结果发现,胜任能力对审计质量有积极影响。同时,独立性、客观性、工作经验完整性和专业怀疑态度对审计质量没有影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Teknologi Informasi, Partisipasi Manajemen, Dan Kemampuan Pemakai Sistem Informasi Akuntansi Terhadap Kinerja Karyawan Bagian Akunatansi Pengaruh Kinerja Lingkungan Dan Biaya Lingkungan Terhadap Kinerja Keuangan AKUNTABILITAS PENGELOLAAN WAKAF PADA BAITUL MAAL HIDAYATULLAH PROVINSI BENGKULU DETERMINAN FRAUD PREVENTION DALAM PENGELOLAAN DANA DESA PENGARUH METODE RGEC TERHADAP NILAI PERUSAHAAN PADA BANK KONVENSIONAL YANG TERDAFTAR DI BEI
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1