Measurement of Language Knowledge as a Controversial Elaborative Linguistic Framework

Mustapha Boughoulid, Abdelkrim El Khatmi
{"title":"Measurement of Language Knowledge as a Controversial Elaborative Linguistic Framework","authors":"Mustapha Boughoulid, Abdelkrim El Khatmi","doi":"10.36892/ijlls.v5i4.1438","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article is an attempt to determine the significance of vocabulary knowledge by describing its components and features on the basis of different existing models in such a way as to explore the language knowledge measurement criteria and find out the extent to which language knowledge is adequately measured. In fact, a plethora of research has been conducted on teaching and learning vocabulary, and testing vocabulary size. Though this linguistic element has been a controversial issue for so long, many scholars in the field of linguistics agreed upon the utility and the crucial role it has in relation to language teaching, learning, and testing. However, the investigation of the vocabulary knowledge takes into consideration three different aspects. The first aspect deals with vocabulary measurement, with the clarification of the differentiation between language knowledge in terms of its inference and language performance in terms of its observation. The second aspect examins the meaning of “word knowledge” by distinguishing between receptive and productive vocabulary knowledge. The third aspect deals with the qualitative aspect of the learners’ vocabulary knowledge in terms of understanding by identifying “breadth” and “depth”. This article also paves the way for the review of vocabulary size and the counting of family words on the basis of rigorous empirical studies in this field.    ","PeriodicalId":34879,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Language and Literary Studies","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Language and Literary Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.36892/ijlls.v5i4.1438","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This article is an attempt to determine the significance of vocabulary knowledge by describing its components and features on the basis of different existing models in such a way as to explore the language knowledge measurement criteria and find out the extent to which language knowledge is adequately measured. In fact, a plethora of research has been conducted on teaching and learning vocabulary, and testing vocabulary size. Though this linguistic element has been a controversial issue for so long, many scholars in the field of linguistics agreed upon the utility and the crucial role it has in relation to language teaching, learning, and testing. However, the investigation of the vocabulary knowledge takes into consideration three different aspects. The first aspect deals with vocabulary measurement, with the clarification of the differentiation between language knowledge in terms of its inference and language performance in terms of its observation. The second aspect examins the meaning of “word knowledge” by distinguishing between receptive and productive vocabulary knowledge. The third aspect deals with the qualitative aspect of the learners’ vocabulary knowledge in terms of understanding by identifying “breadth” and “depth”. This article also paves the way for the review of vocabulary size and the counting of family words on the basis of rigorous empirical studies in this field.    
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
语言知识的测量是一个有争议的阐释性语言学框架
本文试图在现有不同模型的基础上,通过描述词汇知识的构成要素和特征来确定词汇知识的意义,从而探索语言知识的测量标准,找出语言知识的充分测量程度。事实上,关于词汇的教与学、词汇量的测试等方面的研究层出不穷。尽管这一语言要素长期以来一直是一个有争议的问题,但语言学领域的许多学者都认同它在语言教学、学习和测试方面的实用性和关键作用。然而,对词汇知识的研究需要考虑三个不同的方面。第一个方面涉及词汇量的测量,明确语言知识的推理和语言表现的观察之间的区别。第二个方面是通过区分接受性词汇知识和生产性词汇知识来研究 "词汇知识 "的含义。第三方面,通过确定 "广度 "和 "深度",从理解的角度探讨学习者词汇知识的质量问题。本文还在这一领域严谨的实证研究基础上,为回顾词汇量的大小和族词的计数铺平了道路。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
74
审稿时长
6 weeks
期刊最新文献
Gender as a ‘Discursive Practice’ in Romance Discourse Conceptual Review: Cultivating Learner Autonomy Through Self-Directed Learning & Self-Regulated Learning: A Socio-Constructivist Exploration Impact and Identities as Revealed in Tourists' Perceptions of the Linguistic Landscape in Tourist Destinations English Language Learners’ Perception and Motivation Towards Exam Format: A Qualitative Study Essay Writing Strategies Employed by English-Majored Sophomores at A University in Vietnam
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1