Shock-Wave/Boundary-Layer Interactions in Scramjet Intakes with Axisymmetric and Planar Isolators

S. Sharath, Tamal Jana, Mrinal Kaushik
{"title":"Shock-Wave/Boundary-Layer Interactions in Scramjet Intakes with Axisymmetric and Planar Isolators","authors":"S. Sharath,&nbsp;Tamal Jana,&nbsp;Mrinal Kaushik","doi":"10.1007/s42423-023-00146-8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The present study numerically investigates the shock-wave/boundary-layer interactions (SWBLIs) inside a scramjet intake at Mach 4.03. A 2D-planar and an axisymmetric intake are investigated using commercial code ANSYS-Fluent. The density gradient for intakes is computed to investigate and compare the shock cell structure and the separation bubble size. Besides, the velocity and pressure distributions are analyzed for planar and axisymmetric intakes. It is observed from the wall pressure data that the shock strength in the case of axisymmetric intake is lesser than the planar intake. Also, the interaction region in the axisymmetric intake is shifted further downstream with a progressive decrease in shock angle. The recirculation zone or the separation bubble size is minimal for the axisymmetric intake than for planar intake, resulting in higher effective mass flow into the combustion chamber. It can be observed that although the cowl surface experiences the maximum wall static pressure, the recirculation zone formed over the cowl surface is comparatively smaller than that of the ramp surface. The normalized total pressures at the isolator exit indicate that the axisymmetric intake is more efficient in conserving the flow energy than the planar intake. The temperature rise over the ramp surface is higher for planar intake; however, the temperature fluctuations over the ramp surface are more for axisymmetric intake.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":100039,"journal":{"name":"Advances in Astronautics Science and Technology","volume":"6 2-4","pages":"133 - 142"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Advances in Astronautics Science and Technology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s42423-023-00146-8","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The present study numerically investigates the shock-wave/boundary-layer interactions (SWBLIs) inside a scramjet intake at Mach 4.03. A 2D-planar and an axisymmetric intake are investigated using commercial code ANSYS-Fluent. The density gradient for intakes is computed to investigate and compare the shock cell structure and the separation bubble size. Besides, the velocity and pressure distributions are analyzed for planar and axisymmetric intakes. It is observed from the wall pressure data that the shock strength in the case of axisymmetric intake is lesser than the planar intake. Also, the interaction region in the axisymmetric intake is shifted further downstream with a progressive decrease in shock angle. The recirculation zone or the separation bubble size is minimal for the axisymmetric intake than for planar intake, resulting in higher effective mass flow into the combustion chamber. It can be observed that although the cowl surface experiences the maximum wall static pressure, the recirculation zone formed over the cowl surface is comparatively smaller than that of the ramp surface. The normalized total pressures at the isolator exit indicate that the axisymmetric intake is more efficient in conserving the flow energy than the planar intake. The temperature rise over the ramp surface is higher for planar intake; however, the temperature fluctuations over the ramp surface are more for axisymmetric intake.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
带有轴对称和平面隔离器的 Scramjet 入口中的冲击波/边界层相互作用
本研究以数值方法研究了马赫数为 4.03 的争气式喷气发动机进气道内的冲击波/边界层相互作用(SWBLIs)。使用商业代码 ANSYS-Fluent 对二维平面和轴对称进气口进行了研究。计算了进气口的密度梯度,以研究和比较冲击单元结构和分离气泡大小。此外,还分析了平面和轴对称进气口的速度和压力分布。从壁面压力数据可以看出,轴对称进气口的冲击强度小于平面进气口。此外,随着冲击角的逐渐减小,轴对称进气口中的相互作用区域也进一步向下游移动。与平面进气口相比,轴对称进气口的再循环区或分离气泡尺寸最小,因此进入燃烧室的有效质量流量更大。可以看出,虽然整流罩表面承受的壁面静压最大,但整流罩表面形成的再循环区相对小于斜面表面。隔离器出口处的归一化总压力表明,轴对称进气口比平面进气口能更有效地保存流动能量。平面进气口在斜面上的温升较高;然而,轴对称进气口在斜面上的温度波动较大。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Research on Overload Characteristics of Projectile Penetrating Layered Protective Structures with High-Velocity Video Information-Based Liquid Rocket Engine Fault Simulation Test Method under Complex Environment Preface Game Strategies Against High Orbit Surveillance Satellites Orbital Rendezvous Guidance Strategy for Time-Sensitive Missions
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1