Using Online Tools to Help Students Elevate Lexical Range in English-as-a-Foreign-Language Writing

IF 3.6 2区 文学 Q1 LINGUISTICS Relc Journal Pub Date : 2023-12-10 DOI:10.1177/00336882231217528
Bao Trang Thi Nguyen
{"title":"Using Online Tools to Help Students Elevate Lexical Range in English-as-a-Foreign-Language Writing","authors":"Bao Trang Thi Nguyen","doi":"10.1177/00336882231217528","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Different automated writing evaluation tools have been applied in English-as-a-foreign-language (EFL)/English-as-a-second-language (ESL) writing instruction to facilitate feedback giving and enhance writing quality. Yet they fail to provide needs-driven focused feedback that takes account of learner differences and that drives learning. In the Vietnamese tertiary context where I taught the EFL writing course for the present innovation, vocabulary was underscored as one of the key dimensions to be assessed in students’ EFL writing performance. However, many students were not certain about what they could practically do to elevate lexical range in their EFL writing. They tended to use overtly easy words or else they repeated words that have been used to a large extent. This classroom innovation responded to these lexical problems and the recent calls for the instructional pedagogies to provide needs-driven feedback that empowers learners to explore and edit their writing by themselves. It guided students to expand their lexical range in EFL writing through use of online dictionaries and Text Analyzer, a free online tool to find the Common European Framework of Reference level of their written text. The innovation afforded the students the autonomy to explore, reflect on their lexical use and make informed changes about it. The pedagogical values of the innovation were reported from students’ perspectives and my experience as their class teacher. In light of these benefits, future pedagogical directions for upgrading lexical use in EFL writing are further discussed.","PeriodicalId":46946,"journal":{"name":"Relc Journal","volume":"665 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Relc Journal","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/00336882231217528","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"LINGUISTICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Different automated writing evaluation tools have been applied in English-as-a-foreign-language (EFL)/English-as-a-second-language (ESL) writing instruction to facilitate feedback giving and enhance writing quality. Yet they fail to provide needs-driven focused feedback that takes account of learner differences and that drives learning. In the Vietnamese tertiary context where I taught the EFL writing course for the present innovation, vocabulary was underscored as one of the key dimensions to be assessed in students’ EFL writing performance. However, many students were not certain about what they could practically do to elevate lexical range in their EFL writing. They tended to use overtly easy words or else they repeated words that have been used to a large extent. This classroom innovation responded to these lexical problems and the recent calls for the instructional pedagogies to provide needs-driven feedback that empowers learners to explore and edit their writing by themselves. It guided students to expand their lexical range in EFL writing through use of online dictionaries and Text Analyzer, a free online tool to find the Common European Framework of Reference level of their written text. The innovation afforded the students the autonomy to explore, reflect on their lexical use and make informed changes about it. The pedagogical values of the innovation were reported from students’ perspectives and my experience as their class teacher. In light of these benefits, future pedagogical directions for upgrading lexical use in EFL writing are further discussed.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
使用在线工具帮助学生提高英语作为外语写作的词汇范围
在英语作为外语(EFL)/英语作为第二语言(ESL)的写作教学中,已经应用了不同的自动写作评价工具,以促进反馈和提高写作质量。然而,它们未能提供以需求为导向的反馈,未能考虑到学习者的差异并推动学习。在越南高等教育环境中,我教授了本次创新的EFL写作课程,词汇被强调为评估学生EFL写作表现的关键维度之一。然而,许多学生并不确定他们在EFL写作中如何才能切实提高词汇量。他们倾向于使用明显容易的单词,或者重复那些已经被大量使用过的单词。这一课堂创新回应了这些词汇问题,也回应了最近对教学法的呼吁,即提供以需求为导向的反馈,使学习者能够自己探索和修改他们的写作。它引导学生通过使用在线词典和文本分析器(一种免费的在线工具,用于查找其书面文本的《欧洲语言共同参考框架》级别)来扩大他们在 EFL 写作中的词汇范围。这一创新为学生提供了自主探索、反思词汇使用并做出明智改变的机会。从学生的角度和我作为班主任的经验出发,报告了创新的教学价值。鉴于这些益处,我们进一步讨论了提高英语写作中词汇使用水平的未来教学方向。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Relc Journal
Relc Journal LINGUISTICS-
CiteScore
8.10
自引率
10.00%
发文量
64
期刊介绍: The RELC Journal is a fully peer-reviewed international journal that publishes original research and review articles on language education. The aim of this Journal is to present information and ideas on theories, research, methods and materials related to language learning and teaching. Within this framework the Journal welcomes contributions in such areas of current enquiry as first and second language learning and teaching, language and culture, discourse analysis, language planning, language testing, multilingual education, stylistics, translation and information technology. The RELC Journal, therefore, is concerned with linguistics applied to education and contributions that have in mind the common professional concerns of both the practitioner and the researcher.
期刊最新文献
Twee: Artificial Intelligence Assistant to Generate Versatile Materials for Language Education Post-elicitation Wait Time in the Japanese University English as a Foreign Language Classroom Emotion–Identity–Agency Triangle in Practicum Experience: A Pre-service Second Language Teachers Development of Critical Emotional Reflexivity Cultivating Teacher Identity in a Graduate Program: A Holistic Approach EFL Learner Perceptions and Engagement of a Customized AI-led Class
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1