THE METAPHOR: A LITERARY TOOL LENT TO THE ARCHITECTURAL DESIGN. THEORETICAL REFERENCES, RESEARCH METHOD AND PRACTICAL EXPERIENCE IN TEACHING ACTIVITY

Marco Lucchini
{"title":"THE METAPHOR: A LITERARY TOOL LENT TO THE ARCHITECTURAL DESIGN. THEORETICAL REFERENCES, RESEARCH METHOD AND PRACTICAL EXPERIENCE IN TEACHING ACTIVITY","authors":"Marco Lucchini","doi":"10.21005/pif.2023.56.b-05","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The design process in Architectural Design Studio’s first classes for students is often based on images that are erroneously used as references by copying some formal choices. In the most general sense, this issue is related to a gap between architectural culture and society, as architecture is considered a virtual and consumable object. Those problems could be faced with an old but still effective tool that is the metaphor. Architecture is mainly known by images, and each image has a visible and an invisible part; the latter concerns the culture that underlies it. The paper assumes the metaphor is a design tool that can be helpful in the initial stages of the design process as it allows anyone to quickly connect images, ideas, and experiences, getting deeper into the invisible part of images. Since the metaphor is mainly a linguistic agent, most of the studies concern the use of the metaphor in the field of theoretical criticism and for reviewing other projects. The paper proposes to integrate this approach by investigating the metaphor to support the transfer of shapes and figures between different architectures. Furthermore, the proposed process foresees a permanent part based on the type of dynamic and more mobile part where metaphorical thinking finds space. Therefore, two types of use of the metaphor are put forward: the first interprets existing buildings by recognising both linguistic metaphors used by the critics and those crystallized in the architectural form; the second instead stimulates students to use visual metaphors in determining the shape and volume of the project.","PeriodicalId":414139,"journal":{"name":"Space&FORM","volume":"158 ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Space&FORM","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21005/pif.2023.56.b-05","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The design process in Architectural Design Studio’s first classes for students is often based on images that are erroneously used as references by copying some formal choices. In the most general sense, this issue is related to a gap between architectural culture and society, as architecture is considered a virtual and consumable object. Those problems could be faced with an old but still effective tool that is the metaphor. Architecture is mainly known by images, and each image has a visible and an invisible part; the latter concerns the culture that underlies it. The paper assumes the metaphor is a design tool that can be helpful in the initial stages of the design process as it allows anyone to quickly connect images, ideas, and experiences, getting deeper into the invisible part of images. Since the metaphor is mainly a linguistic agent, most of the studies concern the use of the metaphor in the field of theoretical criticism and for reviewing other projects. The paper proposes to integrate this approach by investigating the metaphor to support the transfer of shapes and figures between different architectures. Furthermore, the proposed process foresees a permanent part based on the type of dynamic and more mobile part where metaphorical thinking finds space. Therefore, two types of use of the metaphor are put forward: the first interprets existing buildings by recognising both linguistic metaphors used by the critics and those crystallized in the architectural form; the second instead stimulates students to use visual metaphors in determining the shape and volume of the project.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
比喻:借用于建筑设计的文学工具。教学活动中的理论参考、研究方法和实践经验
在建筑设计工作室为学生开设的第一堂课上,设计过程往往以图片为基础,通过复制一些形式上的选择,错误地将图片作为参考。从最普遍的意义上讲,这个问题与建筑文化和社会之间的差距有关,因为建筑被认为是一种虚拟和可消费的物品。这些问题可以通过一种古老但仍然有效的工具来解决,那就是隐喻。建筑主要通过图像为人所知,而每个图像都有一个可见和不可见的部分;后者涉及作为其基础的文化。本文认为,隐喻是一种设计工具,在设计过程的初始阶段很有帮助,因为它可以让任何人快速将图像、想法和经验联系起来,深入图像的不可见部分。由于隐喻主要是一种语言媒介,大多数研究都涉及隐喻在理论批评领域和其他项目审查中的使用。本文建议整合这一方法,通过研究隐喻来支持不同建筑之间形状和数字的转换。此外,所提议的程序还预见了一个以动态类型为基础的永久性部分,以及隐喻思维找到空间的更加机动的部分。因此,提出了两种使用隐喻的方式:第一种方式是通过识别评论家使用的语言隐喻和建筑形式中的隐喻来解释现有建筑;第二种方式则是激发学生使用视觉隐喻来确定项目的形状和体量。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
MODERN PROJECTION TECHNOLOGIES IN HISTORIC THEATRE HALLS OF CRACOW– OPPORTUNITIES AND RISKS CONSEVATION DILEMMAS – LARCHWOOD MANOR IN RZUCÓW – CASE STUDY CREATIVE DESIGN FROM THE PERSPECTIVE OF CORRECT CHANGE VERSUS ASSESSING DESIGN SOLUTION RELEVANCE USE OF WIND ENERGY OF THE GROUND ZONE IN LOW INDIVIDUAL BUILDINGS INVESTMENTS ON THE GREAT MASURIAN LAKES TRAIL. ACTIVELY FOR RELAXATION – BY YACHT OR BIKE?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1