Measuring woke culture in universities: a diagnostic approach

A. Rzepka, Jan Fazlagić, Imdiyas Ahamed
{"title":"Measuring woke culture in universities: a diagnostic approach","authors":"A. Rzepka, Jan Fazlagić, Imdiyas Ahamed","doi":"10.13166/jms/176387","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper aims to present a synthetic diagnostic tool for assessing wokeism in universities, offering a comprehensive framework derived from an extensive literature review. The purpose is to measure and evaluate the level and impact of wokeism, identifying strengths and weaknesses within university contexts. The framework development involves defining dimensions and indicators of wokeism, collecting and analyzing data through diverse sources like surveys and interviews, scoring and ranking wokeism levels.This paper presents a synthetic diagnostic tool designed for the assessment of wokeism in universities. It extensively reviews literature on wokeism, offering a framework for the creation of this diagnostic tool. The provided examples demonstrate practical applications for measuring and evaluating the level and impact of wokeism within university settings.The paper highlights several limitations and implications that warrant consideration. First, the broad and general definition of wokeism employed might overlook nuanced variations within the movement. Second, reliance on secondary sources and hypothetical data raises concerns about the representation of the actual situation of wokeism in universities. Third, the subjective scoring and ranking system employed may lack the validity and reliability required for a comprehensive assessment.The paper proposes directions for future research and practice. It recommends refining and operationalizing the definition and measurement of wokeism, testing and validating the tool and framework with primary and empirical data, and applying more objective and rigorous methods for scoring and ranking.","PeriodicalId":16359,"journal":{"name":"Journal of modern science","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of modern science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.13166/jms/176387","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This paper aims to present a synthetic diagnostic tool for assessing wokeism in universities, offering a comprehensive framework derived from an extensive literature review. The purpose is to measure and evaluate the level and impact of wokeism, identifying strengths and weaknesses within university contexts. The framework development involves defining dimensions and indicators of wokeism, collecting and analyzing data through diverse sources like surveys and interviews, scoring and ranking wokeism levels.This paper presents a synthetic diagnostic tool designed for the assessment of wokeism in universities. It extensively reviews literature on wokeism, offering a framework for the creation of this diagnostic tool. The provided examples demonstrate practical applications for measuring and evaluating the level and impact of wokeism within university settings.The paper highlights several limitations and implications that warrant consideration. First, the broad and general definition of wokeism employed might overlook nuanced variations within the movement. Second, reliance on secondary sources and hypothetical data raises concerns about the representation of the actual situation of wokeism in universities. Third, the subjective scoring and ranking system employed may lack the validity and reliability required for a comprehensive assessment.The paper proposes directions for future research and practice. It recommends refining and operationalizing the definition and measurement of wokeism, testing and validating the tool and framework with primary and empirical data, and applying more objective and rigorous methods for scoring and ranking.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
衡量大学清醒文化:一种诊断方法
本文旨在介绍一种综合诊断工具,用于评估大学中的觉醒主义,提供了一个从广泛的文献综述中得出的综合框架。其目的是衡量和评估觉醒主义的程度和影响,找出大学环境中的优势和劣势。该框架的开发包括定义觉醒主义的维度和指标,通过调查和访谈等不同来源收集和分析数据,对觉醒主义水平进行评分和排序。本文广泛综述了有关觉醒主义的文献,为创建这一诊断工具提供了一个框架。所提供的示例展示了在大学环境中衡量和评估觉醒主义的程度和影响的实际应用。首先,对觉醒主义所采用的广泛而笼统的定义可能会忽略该运动内部的细微差别。其次,对二手资料和假设数据的依赖引发了对大学中觉醒主义实际情况代表性的担忧。第三,采用的主观评分和排名系统可能缺乏全面评估所需的有效性和可靠性。论文提出了未来研究和实践的方向,建议完善和操作化清醒主义的定义和测量方法,用原始数据和经验数据测试和验证工具和框架,并采用更加客观和严格的方法进行评分和排名。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
28
审稿时长
5 weeks
期刊最新文献
Evolution of Secret Services in Poland. Legal and Social Dimension Special negotiations team as a temporary participating entity in the Act on companies established as a result of cross-border transformation, merger or division Is this already violence? Defining violence and domestic violence and its impact on awareness of the problem Labour incomes and economic activity in Poland Conceptualising securitisation in the field of cyber security policy
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1