Climate change in Poland – the assessment of the conversation with ChatGPT

IF 0.6 Q3 GEOGRAPHY Miscellanea Geographica Pub Date : 2023-12-16 DOI:10.2478/mgrsd-2023-0017
Agnieszka Krzyżewska
{"title":"Climate change in Poland – the assessment of the conversation with ChatGPT","authors":"Agnieszka Krzyżewska","doi":"10.2478/mgrsd-2023-0017","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract ChatGPT, along with its applications, possibilities, limitations and future development, is currently one of the most often discussed topics worldwide. One of the issues raised in those discussions is its ethically questionable role in science and education. The goal of this paper is to assess the accuracy and correctness of the responses given by ChatGPT, using climate change in Poland as an example. Eight questions related to this topic were posed to ChatGPT, and each answer was subsequently verified and assigned a grade on a scale of 0–10. The overall grade obtained was 3.8, indicating that only 30–40% of the information provided by ChatGPT was accurate. This poor result can be attributed to fake references, inaccurate data, overgeneralizations and simplification. Nevertheless, with proper training and development, ChatGPT has tremendous potential to serve as a valuable tool for ethically sound applications in the field of science.","PeriodicalId":44469,"journal":{"name":"Miscellanea Geographica","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Miscellanea Geographica","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2478/mgrsd-2023-0017","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"GEOGRAPHY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract ChatGPT, along with its applications, possibilities, limitations and future development, is currently one of the most often discussed topics worldwide. One of the issues raised in those discussions is its ethically questionable role in science and education. The goal of this paper is to assess the accuracy and correctness of the responses given by ChatGPT, using climate change in Poland as an example. Eight questions related to this topic were posed to ChatGPT, and each answer was subsequently verified and assigned a grade on a scale of 0–10. The overall grade obtained was 3.8, indicating that only 30–40% of the information provided by ChatGPT was accurate. This poor result can be attributed to fake references, inaccurate data, overgeneralizations and simplification. Nevertheless, with proper training and development, ChatGPT has tremendous potential to serve as a valuable tool for ethically sound applications in the field of science.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
波兰的气候变化--与 ChatGPT 对话的评估
摘要 聊天GPT 及其应用、可能性、局限性和未来发展,是目前全世界讨论最多的话题之一。讨论中提出的问题之一是其在科学和教育中的作用是否符合伦理道德。本文旨在以波兰的气候变化为例,评估 ChatGPT 所作回答的准确性和正确性。我们向 ChatGPT 提出了八个与该主题相关的问题,随后对每个答案进行了核实,并按 0-10 的评分标准给每个答案打分。得到的总分是 3.8,表明 ChatGPT 提供的信息只有 30-40% 是准确的。造成这一糟糕结果的原因包括虚假引用、数据不准确、过度概括和简化。尽管如此,经过适当的培训和开发,ChatGPT 仍有巨大潜力成为科学领域道德应用的宝贵工具。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
21
审稿时长
14 weeks
期刊最新文献
Wartanian glacial sediments: insights into deglaciation of Polish Lowlands and Highlands border for geotourism Using machine learning techniques to reconstruct the signal observed by the GRACE mission based on AMSR-E microwave data Preliminary geological work, based on remote sensing analysis, using artificially enhanced satellite data Climate change in Poland – the assessment of the conversation with ChatGPT Comparison of thunderstorm days in Poland based on SYNOP reports and PERUN lightning detection system
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1