Pregnancy outcomes of 4 endometrial preparation protocols in adenomyosis patients with thin endometrium during frozen embryo transfer: a retrospective cohort study

Yi Yu, Xi Zhang, Xin-xin Xu, Lei Yan, Ya-nan Zhang
{"title":"Pregnancy outcomes of 4 endometrial preparation protocols in adenomyosis patients with thin endometrium during frozen embryo transfer: a retrospective cohort study","authors":"Yi Yu, Xi Zhang, Xin-xin Xu, Lei Yan, Ya-nan Zhang","doi":"10.1097/GRH.0000000000000079","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: This study aimed to compare the pregnancy outcomes of different endometrial preparation protocols in patients with adenomyosis and thin endometrium during frozen embryo transfer. Methods: The study, which was conducted at the Reproductive Hospital Affiliated to Shandong University, included 236 patients with adenomyosis and thin endometrium who underwent frozen embryo transfer between January 1, 2011, and December 12, 2022. The pregnancy outcomes and maternal and infant complications among the 4 groups were further compared. Results: These patients with adenomyosis and thin endometrium were divided into 4 groups based on the endometrial preparation protocols used: natural cycle treatment (n=53), hormone replacement therapy group (n=73), gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonists + hormone replacement therapy group (n=49), and ovarian induction group (n=61). The demographic, cycle, and embryologic characteristics were similar between groups. The livebirth rates (P=0.29), full-term pregnancy rates (P=0.55), preterm pregnancy rates (P=0.33), clinical pregnancy rates (P=0.77), biochemical pregnancy miscarriage rates (P=0.28), early miscarriage rates (P=0.16), and late miscarriage rates (P=0.69) were comparable among 4 groups. In addition, there were no significant differences in maternal and infant complications. Conclusion: The pregnancy outcomes of frozen-embryo transfer among 4 endometrial preparation protocols in patients with adenomyosis and thin endometrium were comparable, indicating no significant disparities. In addition, no noteworthy variations were observed in terms of maternal and infant complications in these patients.","PeriodicalId":92638,"journal":{"name":"Global reproductive health","volume":"297 8","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Global reproductive health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/GRH.0000000000000079","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: This study aimed to compare the pregnancy outcomes of different endometrial preparation protocols in patients with adenomyosis and thin endometrium during frozen embryo transfer. Methods: The study, which was conducted at the Reproductive Hospital Affiliated to Shandong University, included 236 patients with adenomyosis and thin endometrium who underwent frozen embryo transfer between January 1, 2011, and December 12, 2022. The pregnancy outcomes and maternal and infant complications among the 4 groups were further compared. Results: These patients with adenomyosis and thin endometrium were divided into 4 groups based on the endometrial preparation protocols used: natural cycle treatment (n=53), hormone replacement therapy group (n=73), gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonists + hormone replacement therapy group (n=49), and ovarian induction group (n=61). The demographic, cycle, and embryologic characteristics were similar between groups. The livebirth rates (P=0.29), full-term pregnancy rates (P=0.55), preterm pregnancy rates (P=0.33), clinical pregnancy rates (P=0.77), biochemical pregnancy miscarriage rates (P=0.28), early miscarriage rates (P=0.16), and late miscarriage rates (P=0.69) were comparable among 4 groups. In addition, there were no significant differences in maternal and infant complications. Conclusion: The pregnancy outcomes of frozen-embryo transfer among 4 endometrial preparation protocols in patients with adenomyosis and thin endometrium were comparable, indicating no significant disparities. In addition, no noteworthy variations were observed in terms of maternal and infant complications in these patients.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
冷冻胚胎移植期间子宫内膜薄的子宫腺肌症患者采用 4 种子宫内膜准备方案的妊娠结局:一项回顾性队列研究
简介本研究旨在比较子宫腺肌症和子宫内膜薄患者在冷冻胚胎移植过程中不同子宫内膜准备方案的妊娠结局。研究方法该研究在山东大学附属生殖医院进行,纳入了2011年1月1日至2022年12月12日期间接受冷冻胚胎移植的236例子宫腺肌症和子宫内膜薄患者。进一步比较了4组患者的妊娠结局和母婴并发症。结果这些子宫腺肌症和子宫内膜薄的患者根据所使用的子宫内膜准备方案分为 4 组:自然周期治疗组(53 人)、激素替代疗法组(73 人)、促性腺激素释放激素激动剂+激素替代疗法组(49 人)和卵巢诱导组(61 人)。各组的人口统计学、周期和胚胎学特征相似。四组的活产率(P=0.29)、足月妊娠率(P=0.55)、早产率(P=0.33)、临床妊娠率(P=0.77)、生化妊娠流产率(P=0.28)、早期流产率(P=0.16)和晚期流产率(P=0.69)相当。此外,母婴并发症无明显差异。结论在子宫腺肌症和子宫内膜薄的患者中,4种子宫内膜制备方案的冷冻胚胎移植妊娠结局相当,无明显差异。此外,在这些患者的母婴并发症方面也没有观察到值得注意的差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Advantages of cryopreservation for fertility preservation due to age-related fertility loss Male factor infertility and implication of fertility treatment in low resource settings Pregnancy outcomes of 4 endometrial preparation protocols in adenomyosis patients with thin endometrium during frozen embryo transfer: a retrospective cohort study Prognostic value of a serum β-human chorionic gonadotropin cutoff, twelve days after fresh embryo transfer, on predicting live birth among Ugandan women The fertility care gap in the Global South: lessons from The Gambia, West Africa, and ways forward to establish fertility care for all
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1